Understanding Software Vulnerabilities in the Maven Ecosystem: Patterns, Timelines, and Risks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22391v1
• Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 12:52:07 GMT
• Title: Understanding Software Vulnerabilities in the Maven Ecosystem: Patterns, Timelines, and Risks
• Authors: Md Fazle Rabbi, Rajshakhar Paul, Arifa Islam Champa, Minhaz F. Zibran,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents a large-scale analysis of vulnerabilities in the Maven ecosystem using the Goblin framework.<n>We identify 77,393 vulnerable releases with 226 unique CWEs.<n>On average, vulnerabilities take nearly half a decade to be documented and 4.4 years to be resolved.
• Score: 1.5499426028105905
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Vulnerabilities in software libraries and reusable components cause major security challenges, particularly in dependency-heavy ecosystems such as Maven. This paper presents a large-scale analysis of vulnerabilities in the Maven ecosystem using the Goblin framework. Our analysis focuses on the aspects and implications of vulnerability types, documentation delays, and resolution timelines. We identify 77,393 vulnerable releases with 226 unique CWEs. On average, vulnerabilities take nearly half a decade to be documented and 4.4 years to be resolved, with some remaining unresolved for even over a decade. The delays in documenting and fixing vulnerabilities incur security risks for the library users emphasizing the need for more careful and efficient vulnerability management in the Maven ecosystem.

Related papers

• Mining for Lags in Updating Critical Security Threats: A Case Study of Log4j Library [2.593806238402966]
  Delays in applying patch updates can leave client systems exposed to exploitation. We identify factors influencing update lags and categorize them based on version classification. Results show that lags exist, but projects with higher release cycle rates tend to address severe security issues more swiftly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T03:02:16Z)
• The Ripple Effect of Vulnerabilities in Maven Central: Prevalence, Propagation, and Mitigation Challenges [8.955037553566774]
  We analyze the prevalence and impact of vulnerabilities within the Maven Central ecosystem using Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures data. In our subsample of around 4 million releases, we found that while only about 1% of releases have direct vulnerabilities. We also observed that the time taken to patch vulnerabilities, including those of high or critical severity, often spans several years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T13:45:27Z)
• Decoding Dependency Risks: A Quantitative Study of Vulnerabilities in the Maven Ecosystem [1.5499426028105905]
  This study investigates vulnerabilities within the Maven ecosystem by analyzing a comprehensive dataset of 14,459,139 releases.<n>We show risky weaknesses, those unique to Maven, and emphasize those becoming increasingly dangerous over time.<n>Our findings suggest that improper handling of input and mismanagement of resources pose the most risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T04:16:46Z)
• Tracing Vulnerabilities in Maven: A Study of CVE lifecycles and Dependency Networks [0.46040036610482665]
  This study analyzes the lifecycle of 3,362 CVEs in Maven to uncover patterns in vulnerability mitigation and identify factors influencing at-risk packages.<n>A key finding reveals a trend in "Publish-Before-Patch" scenarios: maintainers prioritize patching severe vulnerabilities more quickly after public disclosure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T02:43:35Z)
• Discovery of Timeline and Crowd Reaction of Software Vulnerability Disclosures [47.435076500269545]
  Apache Log4J was found to be vulnerable to remote code execution attacks. More than 35,000 packages were forced to update their Log4J libraries with the latest version. It is practically reasonable for software developers to update their third-party libraries whenever the software vendors have released a vulnerable-free version.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T01:55:51Z)
• The Impact of SBOM Generators on Vulnerability Assessment in Python: A Comparison and a Novel Approach [56.4040698609393]
  Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) has been promoted as a tool to increase transparency and verifiability in software composition. Current SBOM generation tools often suffer from inaccuracies in identifying components and dependencies. We propose PIP-sbom, a novel pip-inspired solution that addresses their shortcomings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T10:12:37Z)
• Empirical Analysis of Vulnerabilities Life Cycle in Golang Ecosystem [0.773844059806915]
  A comprehensive investigation was undertaken to examine the life cycle of vulnerability in Golang. It turned out that 66.10% of modules in the Golang ecosystem were affected by vulnerabilities. By analyzing reasons behind non-lagged and lagged vulnerabilities, timely releasing and indexing patch versions could significantly enhance ecosystem security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T14:53:51Z)
• REEF: A Framework for Collecting Real-World Vulnerabilities and Fixes [40.401211102969356]
  We propose an automated collecting framework REEF to collect REal-world vulnErabilities and Fixes from open-source repositories. We develop a multi-language crawler to collect vulnerabilities and their fixes, and design metrics to filter for high-quality vulnerability-fix pairs. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our approach can collect high-quality vulnerability-fix pairs and generate strong explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-15T02:50:08Z)
• Mitigating Persistence of Open-Source Vulnerabilities in Maven Ecosystem [13.193125763978255]
  Despite patches being released promptly after vulnerabilities are disclosed, the libraries and applications in the community still use the vulnerable versions. We propose a solution for range restoration (Ranger) to automatically restore the compatible and secure version ranges of dependencies for downstream dependents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T09:11:26Z)
• On the Security Blind Spots of Software Composition Analysis [46.1389163921338]
  We present a novel approach to detect vulnerable clones in the Maven repository. We retrieve over 53k potential vulnerable clones from Maven Central. We detect 727 confirmed vulnerable clones and synthesize a testable proof-of-vulnerability project for each of those.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T20:14:46Z)
• Dos and Don'ts of Machine Learning in Computer Security [74.1816306998445]
  Despite great potential, machine learning in security is prone to subtle pitfalls that undermine its performance. We identify common pitfalls in the design, implementation, and evaluation of learning-based security systems. We propose actionable recommendations to support researchers in avoiding or mitigating the pitfalls where possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T13:09:31Z)
• Autosploit: A Fully Automated Framework for Evaluating the Exploitability of Security Vulnerabilities [47.748732208602355]
  Autosploit is an automated framework for evaluating the exploitability of vulnerabilities. It automatically tests the exploits on different configurations of the environment. It is able to identify the system properties that affect the ability to exploit a vulnerability in both noiseless and noisy environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-30T18:49:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.