Mining for Lags in Updating Critical Security Threats: A Case Study of Log4j Library

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09834v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 03:02:16 GMT
• Title: Mining for Lags in Updating Critical Security Threats: A Case Study of Log4j Library
• Authors: Hidetake Tanaka, Kazuma Yamasaki, Momoka Hirose, Takashi Nakano, Youmei Fan, Kazumasa Shimari, Raula Gaikovina Kula, Kenichi Matsumoto,
• Abstract summary: Delays in applying patch updates can leave client systems exposed to exploitation.<n>We identify factors influencing update lags and categorize them based on version classification.<n>Results show that lags exist, but projects with higher release cycle rates tend to address severe security issues more swiftly.
• Score: 2.593806238402966
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The Log4j-Core vulnerability, known as Log4Shell, exposed significant challenges to dependency management in software ecosystems. When a critical vulnerability is disclosed, it is imperative that dependent packages quickly adopt patched versions to mitigate risks. However, delays in applying these updates can leave client systems exposed to exploitation. Previous research has primarily focused on NPM, but there is a need for similar analysis in other ecosystems, such as Maven. Leveraging the 2025 mining challenge dataset of Java dependencies, we identify factors influencing update lags and categorize them based on version classification (major, minor, patch release cycles). Results show that lags exist, but projects with higher release cycle rates tend to address severe security issues more swiftly. In addition, over half of vulnerability fixes are implemented through patch updates, highlighting the critical role of incremental changes in maintaining software security. Our findings confirm that these lags also appear in the Maven ecosystem, even when migrating away from severe threats.

Related papers

• SafeMLRM: Demystifying Safety in Multi-modal Large Reasoning Models [50.34706204154244]
  Acquiring reasoning capabilities catastrophically degrades inherited safety alignment. Certain scenarios suffer 25 times higher attack rates. Despite tight reasoning-answer safety coupling, MLRMs demonstrate nascent self-correction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T06:53:23Z)
• The Ripple Effect of Vulnerabilities in Maven Central: Prevalence, Propagation, and Mitigation Challenges [8.955037553566774]
  We analyze the prevalence and impact of vulnerabilities within the Maven Central ecosystem using Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures data.<n>In our subsample of around 4 million releases, we found that while only about 1% of releases have direct vulnerabilities.<n>We also observed that the time taken to patch vulnerabilities, including those of high or critical severity, often spans several years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T13:45:27Z)
• Faster Releases, Fewer Risks: A Study on Maven Artifact Vulnerabilities and Lifecycle Management [0.14999444543328289]
  We analyze the release histories of 10,000 Maven artifacts, covering over 203,000 releases and 1.7 million dependencies.<n>Our results show an inverse relationship between release speed and dependency outdatedness.<n>These findings emphasize the importance of accelerated release strategies in reducing security risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T17:32:45Z)
• Understanding Software Vulnerabilities in the Maven Ecosystem: Patterns, Timelines, and Risks [1.5499426028105905]
  This paper presents a large-scale analysis of vulnerabilities in the Maven ecosystem using the Goblin framework.<n>We identify 77,393 vulnerable releases with 226 unique CWEs.<n>On average, vulnerabilities take nearly half a decade to be documented and 4.4 years to be resolved.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T12:52:07Z)
• Decoding Dependency Risks: A Quantitative Study of Vulnerabilities in the Maven Ecosystem [1.5499426028105905]
  This study investigates vulnerabilities within the Maven ecosystem by analyzing a comprehensive dataset of 14,459,139 releases.<n>We show risky weaknesses, those unique to Maven, and emphasize those becoming increasingly dangerous over time.<n>Our findings suggest that improper handling of input and mismanagement of resources pose the most risk.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T04:16:46Z)
• Layer-Level Self-Exposure and Patch: Affirmative Token Mitigation for Jailbreak Attack Defense [55.77152277982117]
  We introduce Layer-AdvPatcher, a methodology designed to defend against jailbreak attacks.<n>We use an unlearning strategy to patch specific layers within large language models through self-augmented datasets.<n>Our framework reduces the harmfulness and attack success rate of jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-05T19:06:03Z)
• Discovery of Timeline and Crowd Reaction of Software Vulnerability Disclosures [47.435076500269545]
  Apache Log4J was found to be vulnerable to remote code execution attacks. More than 35,000 packages were forced to update their Log4J libraries with the latest version. It is practically reasonable for software developers to update their third-party libraries whenever the software vendors have released a vulnerable-free version.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T01:55:51Z)
• The Impact of SBOM Generators on Vulnerability Assessment in Python: A Comparison and a Novel Approach [56.4040698609393]
  Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) has been promoted as a tool to increase transparency and verifiability in software composition. Current SBOM generation tools often suffer from inaccuracies in identifying components and dependencies. We propose PIP-sbom, a novel pip-inspired solution that addresses their shortcomings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T10:12:37Z)
• Mitigating Persistence of Open-Source Vulnerabilities in Maven Ecosystem [13.193125763978255]
  Despite patches being released promptly after vulnerabilities are disclosed, the libraries and applications in the community still use the vulnerable versions. We propose a solution for range restoration (Ranger) to automatically restore the compatible and secure version ranges of dependencies for downstream dependents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T09:11:26Z)
• On the Security Blind Spots of Software Composition Analysis [46.1389163921338]
  We present a novel approach to detect vulnerable clones in the Maven repository. We retrieve over 53k potential vulnerable clones from Maven Central. We detect 727 confirmed vulnerable clones and synthesize a testable proof-of-vulnerability project for each of those.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T20:14:46Z)
• Robust and Transferable Anomaly Detection in Log Data using Pre-Trained Language Models [59.04636530383049]
  Anomalies or failures in large computer systems, such as the cloud, have an impact on a large number of users. We propose a framework for anomaly detection in log data, as a major troubleshooting source of system information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-23T09:17:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.