Elite Political Discourse has Become More Toxic in Western Countries
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22411v1
- Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 13:21:49 GMT
- Title: Elite Political Discourse has Become More Toxic in Western Countries
- Authors: Petter Törnberg, Juliana Chueri,
- Abstract summary: Toxic and uncivil politics is seen as a growing threat to democratic values and governance.<n>This paper systematically investigates whether politics internationally is becoming more uncivil, and what are the determinants of political incivility.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Toxic and uncivil politics is widely seen as a growing threat to democratic values and governance, yet our understanding of the drivers and evolution of political incivility remains limited. Leveraging a novel dataset of nearly 18 million Twitter messages from parliamentarians in 17 countries over five years, this paper systematically investigates whether politics internationally is becoming more uncivil, and what are the determinants of political incivility. Our analysis reveals a marked increase in toxic discourse among political elites, and that it is associated to radical-right parties and parties in opposition. Toxicity diminished markedly during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic and, surprisingly, during election campaigns. Furthermore, our results indicate that posts relating to ``culture war'' topics, such as migration and LGBTQ+ rights, are substantially more toxic than debates focused on welfare or economic issues. These findings underscore a troubling shift in international democracies toward an erosion of constructive democratic dialogue.
Related papers
- On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes.
Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z) - When Neutral Summaries are not that Neutral: Quantifying Political Neutrality in LLM-Generated News Summaries [0.0]
This study presents a fresh perspective on quantifying the political neutrality of LLMs.
We consider five pressing issues in current US politics: abortion, gun control/rights, healthcare, immigration, and LGBTQ+ rights.
Our study reveals a consistent trend towards pro-Democratic biases in several well-known LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-13T19:44:39Z) - Representation Bias in Political Sample Simulations with Large Language Models [54.48283690603358]
This study seeks to identify and quantify biases in simulating political samples with Large Language Models.
Using the GPT-3.5-Turbo model, we leverage data from the American National Election Studies, German Longitudinal Election Study, Zuobiao dataset, and China Family Panel Studies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-16T05:52:26Z) - Whose Side Are You On? Investigating the Political Stance of Large Language Models [56.883423489203786]
We investigate the political orientation of Large Language Models (LLMs) across a spectrum of eight polarizing topics.
Our investigation delves into the political alignment of LLMs across a spectrum of eight polarizing topics, spanning from abortion to LGBTQ issues.
The findings suggest that users should be mindful when crafting queries, and exercise caution in selecting neutral prompt language.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-15T04:02:24Z) - Social media polarization reflects shifting political alliances in
Pakistan [44.99833362998488]
Spanning from 2018 to 2022, our analysis of Twitter data allows us to capture pivotal shifts and developments in Pakistan's political arena.
By examining interactions and content generated by politicians affiliated with major political parties, we reveal a consistent and active presence of politicians on Twitter.
Our analysis also uncovers significant shifts in political affiliations, including the transition of politicians to the opposition alliance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-15T00:07:48Z) - Changes in Policy Preferences in German Tweets during the COVID Pandemic [4.663960015139793]
We present a novel data set of tweets with fine grained political preference annotations.
A text classification model trained on this data is used to extract political opinions.
Results indicate that in response to the COVID pandemic, expression of political opinions increased.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-31T16:07:28Z) - Detecting Multidimensional Political Incivility on Social Media [2.3704813250344436]
We present state-of-the-art incivility detection results using a large dataset of 13K political tweets.
We observe that political incivility demonstrates a highly skewed distribution over users, and examine social factors that correlate with incivility at subpopulation and user-level.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T09:57:12Z) - The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [50.24983453990065]
We use a deep-learning approach to process a sample of 220 YouTube videos of political leaders from 15 different countries.
We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z) - Millions of Co-purchases and Reviews Reveal the Spread of Polarization
and Lifestyle Politics across Online Markets [68.8204255655161]
We study the pervasiveness of polarization and lifestyle politics over different product segments in a diverse market.
We sample 234.6 million relations among 21.8 million market entities to find product categories that are politically relevant, aligned, and polarized.
Cultural products are 4 times more polarized than any other segment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-17T18:16:37Z) - Demographic Confounding Causes Extreme Instances of Lifestyle Politics
on Facebook [73.37786708074361]
We find that the most extreme instances of lifestyle politics are those which are highly confounded by demographics such as race/ethnicity.
The most liberal interests included electric cars, Planned Parenthood, and liberal satire while the most conservative interests included the Republican Party and conservative commentators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-17T16:48:00Z) - Low Government Performance and Uncivil Political Posts on Social Media:
Evidence from the COVID-19 Crisis in the US [0.0]
It is less clear how a government's performance is linked with people's uncivil political expression on social media.
The present study collected over 8 million posts on X/Twitter directed at US state governors and classified them as uncivil or not.
The results of the statistical analyses showed that increases in state-level COVID-19 cases led to a significantly higher number of uncivil posts against state governors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-21T12:19:14Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.