Towards an intelligent assessment system for evaluating the development of algorithmic thinking skills: An exploratory study in Swiss compulsory schools
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22756v1
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 13:34:36 GMT
- Title: Towards an intelligent assessment system for evaluating the development of algorithmic thinking skills: An exploratory study in Swiss compulsory schools
- Authors: Giorgia Adorni,
- Abstract summary: This study aims to develop a comprehensive framework for large-scale assessment of CT skills, particularly focusing on AT, the ability to design algorithms.<n>We first developed a competence model capturing the situated and developmental nature of CT, guiding the design of activities tailored to cognitive abilities, age, and context.<n>We developed an activity for large-scale assessment of AT skills, offered in two variants: one based on non-digital artefacts (unplugged) and manual expert assessment, and the other based on digital artefacts (virtual) and automatic assessment.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The rapid digitalisation of contemporary society has profoundly impacted various facets of our lives, including healthcare, communication, business, and education. The ability to engage with new technologies and solve problems has become crucial, making CT skills, such as pattern recognition, decomposition, and algorithm design, essential competencies. In response, Switzerland is conducting research and initiatives to integrate CT into its educational system. This study aims to develop a comprehensive framework for large-scale assessment of CT skills, particularly focusing on AT, the ability to design algorithms. To achieve this, we first developed a competence model capturing the situated and developmental nature of CT, guiding the design of activities tailored to cognitive abilities, age, and context. This framework clarifies how activity characteristics influence CT development and how to assess these competencies. Additionally, we developed an activity for large-scale assessment of AT skills, offered in two variants: one based on non-digital artefacts (unplugged) and manual expert assessment, and the other based on digital artefacts (virtual) and automatic assessment. To provide a more comprehensive evaluation of students' competencies, we developed an IAS based on BNs with noisy gates, which offers real-time probabilistic assessment for each skill rather than a single overall score. The results indicate that the proposed instrument can measure AT competencies across different age groups and educational contexts in Switzerland, demonstrating its applicability for large-scale use. AT competencies exhibit a progressive development, with no overall gender differences, though variations are observed at the school level, significantly influenced by the artefact-based environment and its context, underscoring the importance of creating accessible and adaptable assessment tools.
Related papers
- Closing the Evaluation Gap: Developing a Behavior-Oriented Framework for Assessing Virtual Teamwork Competency [6.169364905804677]
This study develops a behavior-oriented framework for assessing virtual teamwork competencies among engineering students.
Using focus group interviews combined with the Critical Incident Technique, the study identified three key dimensions.
The resulting framework provides a foundation for more effective assessment practices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-20T08:12:27Z) - Latent-Predictive Empowerment: Measuring Empowerment without a Simulator [56.53777237504011]
We present Latent-Predictive Empowerment (LPE), an algorithm that can compute empowerment in a more practical manner.
LPE learns large skillsets by maximizing an objective that is a principled replacement for the mutual information between skills and states.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-15T00:41:18Z) - Designing the virtual CAT: A digital tool for algorithmic thinking assessment in compulsory education [0.0]
Algorithmic thinking (AT) is a critical skill in today's digital society.
We present the design and development process of the virtual Cross Array Task (CAT)
It is a digital adaptation of an unplugged assessment activity aimed at evaluating algorithmic skills in Swiss compulsory education.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-02T13:36:17Z) - Rubric-based Learner Modelling via Noisy Gates Bayesian Networks for Computational Thinking Skills Assessment [40.06500618820166]
We develop a learner model for automatic skill assessment from a task-specific competence rubric.
We design a network with two layers of gates, one performing disjunctive operations by noisy-OR gates and the other conjunctive operations through logical ANDs.
The CT-cube skills assessment framework and the Cross Array Task (CAT) are used to exemplify it and demonstrate its feasibility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-02T12:21:05Z) - Evaluating Human-AI Collaboration: A Review and Methodological Framework [4.41358655687435]
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in working environments with individuals, known as Human-AI Collaboration (HAIC), has become essential.<n> evaluating HAIC's effectiveness remains challenging due to the complex interaction of components involved.<n>This paper provides a detailed analysis of existing HAIC evaluation approaches and develops a fresh paradigm for more effectively evaluating these systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-09T12:52:22Z) - Are we making progress in unlearning? Findings from the first NeurIPS unlearning competition [70.60872754129832]
First NeurIPS competition on unlearning sought to stimulate the development of novel algorithms.
Nearly 1,200 teams from across the world participated.
We analyze top solutions and delve into discussions on benchmarking unlearning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-13T12:58:00Z) - A Comprehensive Survey on Underwater Image Enhancement Based on Deep Learning [51.7818820745221]
Underwater image enhancement (UIE) presents a significant challenge within computer vision research.
Despite the development of numerous UIE algorithms, a thorough and systematic review is still absent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-30T04:46:40Z) - ConSiDERS-The-Human Evaluation Framework: Rethinking Human Evaluation for Generative Large Language Models [53.00812898384698]
We argue that human evaluation of generative large language models (LLMs) should be a multidisciplinary undertaking.
We highlight how cognitive biases can conflate fluent information and truthfulness, and how cognitive uncertainty affects the reliability of rating scores such as Likert.
We propose the ConSiDERS-The-Human evaluation framework consisting of 6 pillars -- Consistency, Scoring Criteria, Differentiating, User Experience, Responsible, and Scalability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-28T22:45:28Z) - A Domain-Agnostic Approach for Characterization of Lifelong Learning
Systems [128.63953314853327]
"Lifelong Learning" systems are capable of 1) Continuous Learning, 2) Transfer and Adaptation, and 3) Scalability.
We show that this suite of metrics can inform the development of varied and complex Lifelong Learning systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-18T21:58:54Z) - Modelling Assessment Rubrics through Bayesian Networks: a Pragmatic Approach [40.06500618820166]
This paper presents an approach to deriving a learner model directly from an assessment rubric.
We illustrate how the approach can be applied to automatize the human assessment of an activity developed for testing computational thinking skills.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-07T10:09:12Z) - A Competence-aware Curriculum for Visual Concepts Learning via Question
Answering [95.35905804211698]
We propose a competence-aware curriculum for visual concept learning in a question-answering manner.
We design a neural-symbolic concept learner for learning the visual concepts and a multi-dimensional Item Response Theory (mIRT) model for guiding the learning process.
Experimental results on CLEVR show that with a competence-aware curriculum, the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-03T05:08:09Z) - Zur Modellierung und Klassifizierung von Kompetenzen in der
grundlegenden Programmierausbildung anhand der Anderson Krathwohl Taxonomie [0.0]
This research paper focusses on the competences expected from computer science novices in the domain of basic programming.
By means of a qualitative content analysis of current learning objectives at German universities and the perspective of university teachers, basic programming competencies are identified.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-24T17:07:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.