Rubric-based Learner Modelling via Noisy Gates Bayesian Networks for Computational Thinking Skills Assessment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.01221v1
• Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2024 12:21:05 GMT
• Title: Rubric-based Learner Modelling via Noisy Gates Bayesian Networks for Computational Thinking Skills Assessment
• Authors: Giorgia Adorni, Francesca Mangili, Alberto Piatti, Claudio Bonesana, Alessandro Antonucci,
• Abstract summary: We develop a learner model for automatic skill assessment from a task-specific competence rubric. We design a network with two layers of gates, one performing disjunctive operations by noisy-OR gates and the other conjunctive operations through logical ANDs. The CT-cube skills assessment framework and the Cross Array Task (CAT) are used to exemplify it and demonstrate its feasibility.
• Score: 40.06500618820166
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In modern and personalised education, there is a growing interest in developing learners' competencies and accurately assessing them. In a previous work, we proposed a procedure for deriving a learner model for automatic skill assessment from a task-specific competence rubric, thus simplifying the implementation of automated assessment tools. The previous approach, however, suffered two main limitations: (i) the ordering between competencies defined by the assessment rubric was only indirectly modelled; (ii) supplementary skills, not under assessment but necessary for accomplishing the task, were not included in the model. In this work, we address issue (i) by introducing dummy observed nodes, strictly enforcing the skills ordering without changing the network's structure. In contrast, for point (ii), we design a network with two layers of gates, one performing disjunctive operations by noisy-OR gates and the other conjunctive operations through logical ANDs. Such changes improve the model outcomes' coherence and the modelling tool's flexibility without compromising the model's compact parametrisation, interpretability and simple experts' elicitation. We used this approach to develop a learner model for Computational Thinking (CT) skills assessment. The CT-cube skills assessment framework and the Cross Array Task (CAT) are used to exemplify it and demonstrate its feasibility.

Related papers

• Exploring Cross-model Neuronal Correlations in the Context of Predicting Model Performance and Generalizability [2.6708879445664584]
  This paper introduces a novel approach for assessing a newly trained model's performance based on another known model. The proposed method evaluates correlations by determining if, for each neuron in one network, there exists a neuron in the other network that produces similar output.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T22:57:39Z)
• Estimating Knowledge in Large Language Models Without Generating a Single Token [12.913172023910203]
  Current methods to evaluate knowledge in large language models (LLMs) query the model and then evaluate its generated responses. In this work, we ask whether evaluation can be done before the model has generated any text. Experiments with a variety of LLMs show that KEEN, a simple probe trained over internal subject representations, succeeds at both tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T14:45:50Z)
• Multi-Modal Prompt Learning on Blind Image Quality Assessment [65.0676908930946]
  Image Quality Assessment (IQA) models benefit significantly from semantic information, which allows them to treat different types of objects distinctly. Traditional methods, hindered by a lack of sufficiently annotated data, have employed the CLIP image-text pretraining model as their backbone to gain semantic awareness. Recent approaches have attempted to address this mismatch using prompt technology, but these solutions have shortcomings. This paper introduces an innovative multi-modal prompt-based methodology for IQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-23T11:45:32Z)
• QualEval: Qualitative Evaluation for Model Improvement [82.73561470966658]
  We propose QualEval, which augments quantitative scalar metrics with automated qualitative evaluation as a vehicle for model improvement. QualEval uses a powerful LLM reasoner and our novel flexible linear programming solver to generate human-readable insights. We demonstrate that leveraging its insights, for example, improves the absolute performance of the Llama 2 model by up to 15% points relative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T00:21:44Z)
• Ladder-of-Thought: Using Knowledge as Steps to Elevate Stance Detection [73.31406286956535]
  We introduce the Ladder-of-Thought (LoT) for the stance detection task. LoT directs the small LMs to assimilate high-quality external knowledge, refining the intermediate rationales produced. Our empirical evaluations underscore LoT's efficacy, marking a 16% improvement over GPT-3.5 and a 10% enhancement compared to GPT-3.5 with CoT on stance detection task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T14:31:48Z)
• Modelling Assessment Rubrics through Bayesian Networks: a Pragmatic Approach [40.06500618820166]
  This paper presents an approach to deriving a learner model directly from an assessment rubric. We illustrate how the approach can be applied to automatize the human assessment of an activity developed for testing computational thinking skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-07T10:09:12Z)
• Combining Modular Skills in Multitask Learning [149.8001096811708]
  A modular design encourages neural models to disentangle and recombine different facets of knowledge to generalise more systematically to new tasks. In this work, we assume each task is associated with a subset of latent discrete skills from a (potentially small) inventory. We find that the modular design of a network significantly increases sample efficiency in reinforcement learning and few-shot generalisation in supervised learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-28T16:07:19Z)
• Explaining, Evaluating and Enhancing Neural Networks' Learned Representations [2.1485350418225244]
  We show how explainability can be an aid, rather than an obstacle, towards better and more efficient representations. We employ such attributions to define two novel scores for evaluating the informativeness and the disentanglement of latent embeddings. We show that adopting our proposed scores as constraints during the training of a representation learning task improves the downstream performance of the model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-18T19:00:01Z)
• Explain, Edit, and Understand: Rethinking User Study Design for Evaluating Model Explanations [97.91630330328815]
  We conduct a crowdsourcing study, where participants interact with deception detection models that have been trained to distinguish between genuine and fake hotel reviews. We observe that for a linear bag-of-words model, participants with access to the feature coefficients during training are able to cause a larger reduction in model confidence in the testing phase when compared to the no-explanation control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-17T18:29:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.