Chasing the Clock: How Fast Are Vulnerabilities Fixed in the Maven Ecosystem?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22894v1
• Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 21:48:22 GMT
• Title: Chasing the Clock: How Fast Are Vulnerabilities Fixed in the Maven Ecosystem?
• Authors: Md Fazle Rabbi, Arifa Islam Champa, Rajshakhar Paul, Minhaz F. Zibran,
• Abstract summary: The study focuses on the influence of CVE severity, library popularity as measured by the number of dependents, and version release frequency.<n>The results suggest that critical vulnerabilities are addressed slightly faster compared to lower-severity ones.
• Score: 1.5499426028105905
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study investigates the software vulnerability resolution time in the Maven ecosystem, focusing on the influence of CVE severity, library popularity as measured by the number of dependents, and version release frequency. The results suggest that critical vulnerabilities are addressed slightly faster compared to lower-severity ones. Library popularity shows a positive impact on resolution times, while frequent version updates are associated with faster vulnerability fixes. These statistically significant findings are based on a thorough evaluation of over 14 million versions from 658,078 libraries using the dependency graph database of Goblin framework. These results emphasize the need for proactive maintenance strategies to improve vulnerability management in open-source ecosystems.

Related papers

• Mining for Lags in Updating Critical Security Threats: A Case Study of Log4j Library [2.593806238402966]
  Delays in applying patch updates can leave client systems exposed to exploitation. We identify factors influencing update lags and categorize them based on version classification. Results show that lags exist, but projects with higher release cycle rates tend to address severe security issues more swiftly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T03:02:16Z)
• The Ripple Effect of Vulnerabilities in Maven Central: Prevalence, Propagation, and Mitigation Challenges [8.955037553566774]
  We analyze the prevalence and impact of vulnerabilities within the Maven Central ecosystem using Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures data. In our subsample of around 4 million releases, we found that while only about 1% of releases have direct vulnerabilities. We also observed that the time taken to patch vulnerabilities, including those of high or critical severity, often spans several years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T13:45:27Z)
• Faster Releases, Fewer Risks: A Study on Maven Artifact Vulnerabilities and Lifecycle Management [0.14999444543328289]
  We analyze the release histories of 10,000 Maven artifacts, covering over 203,000 releases and 1.7 million dependencies.<n>Our results show an inverse relationship between release speed and dependency outdatedness.<n>These findings emphasize the importance of accelerated release strategies in reducing security risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T17:32:45Z)
• Tracing Vulnerabilities in Maven: A Study of CVE lifecycles and Dependency Networks [0.46040036610482665]
  This study analyzes the lifecycle of 3,362 CVEs in Maven to uncover patterns in vulnerability mitigation and identify factors influencing at-risk packages.<n>A key finding reveals a trend in "Publish-Before-Patch" scenarios: maintainers prioritize patching severe vulnerabilities more quickly after public disclosure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T02:43:35Z)
• Discovery of Timeline and Crowd Reaction of Software Vulnerability Disclosures [47.435076500269545]
  Apache Log4J was found to be vulnerable to remote code execution attacks. More than 35,000 packages were forced to update their Log4J libraries with the latest version. It is practically reasonable for software developers to update their third-party libraries whenever the software vendors have released a vulnerable-free version.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T01:55:51Z)
• The Impact of SBOM Generators on Vulnerability Assessment in Python: A Comparison and a Novel Approach [56.4040698609393]
  Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) has been promoted as a tool to increase transparency and verifiability in software composition. Current SBOM generation tools often suffer from inaccuracies in identifying components and dependencies. We propose PIP-sbom, a novel pip-inspired solution that addresses their shortcomings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T10:12:37Z)
• A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreaks [72.8807309802266]
  StrongREJECT is a high-quality benchmark for evaluating jailbreak performance. It scores the harmfulness of a victim model's responses to forbidden prompts. It achieves state-of-the-art agreement with human judgments of jailbreak effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T18:58:09Z)
• Empirical Analysis of Vulnerabilities Life Cycle in Golang Ecosystem [0.773844059806915]
  A comprehensive investigation was undertaken to examine the life cycle of vulnerability in Golang. It turned out that 66.10% of modules in the Golang ecosystem were affected by vulnerabilities. By analyzing reasons behind non-lagged and lagged vulnerabilities, timely releasing and indexing patch versions could significantly enhance ecosystem security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T14:53:51Z)
• Mitigating Persistence of Open-Source Vulnerabilities in Maven Ecosystem [13.193125763978255]
  Despite patches being released promptly after vulnerabilities are disclosed, the libraries and applications in the community still use the vulnerable versions. We propose a solution for range restoration (Ranger) to automatically restore the compatible and secure version ranges of dependencies for downstream dependents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T09:11:26Z)
• On the Security Blind Spots of Software Composition Analysis [46.1389163921338]
  We present a novel approach to detect vulnerable clones in the Maven repository. We retrieve over 53k potential vulnerable clones from Maven Central. We detect 727 confirmed vulnerable clones and synthesize a testable proof-of-vulnerability project for each of those.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T20:14:46Z)
• VELVET: a noVel Ensemble Learning approach to automatically locate VulnErable sTatements [62.93814803258067]
  This paper presents VELVET, a novel ensemble learning approach to locate vulnerable statements in source code. Our model combines graph-based and sequence-based neural networks to successfully capture the local and global context of a program graph. VELVET achieves 99.6% and 43.6% top-1 accuracy over synthetic data and real-world data, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-20T22:45:27Z)
• RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmark [84.50044645539305]
  Key challenge in benchmarking robustness is that its evaluation is often error-prone leading to robustness overestimation. We evaluate adversarial robustness with AutoAttack, an ensemble of white- and black-box attacks. We analyze the impact of robustness on the performance on distribution shifts, calibration, out-of-distribution detection, fairness, privacy leakage, smoothness, and transferability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T17:06:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.