Taxonomizing Representational Harms using Speech Act Theory

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.00928v1
• Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 16:00:17 GMT
• Title: Taxonomizing Representational Harms using Speech Act Theory
• Authors: Emily Corvi, Hannah Washington, Stefanie Reed, Chad Atalla, Alexandra Chouldechova, P. Alex Dow, Jean Garcia-Gathright, Nicholas Pangakis, Emily Sheng, Dan Vann, Matthew Vogel, Hanna Wallach,
• Abstract summary: We present a framework that conceptualizes representational harms caused by generative language systems as the perlocutionary effects (i.e., real-world impacts) of particular types of illocutionary acts.<n>We then use our framework to develop a granular taxonomy of illocutionary acts that cause representational harms.
• Score: 38.428057679114424
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Representational harms are widely recognized among fairness-related harms caused by generative language systems. However, their definitions are commonly under-specified. We present a framework, grounded in speech act theory (Austin, 1962), that conceptualizes representational harms caused by generative language systems as the perlocutionary effects (i.e., real-world impacts) of particular types of illocutionary acts (i.e., system behaviors). Building on this argument and drawing on relevant literature from linguistic anthropology and sociolinguistics, we provide new definitions stereotyping, demeaning, and erasure. We then use our framework to develop a granular taxonomy of illocutionary acts that cause representational harms, going beyond the high-level taxonomies presented in previous work. We also discuss the ways that our framework and taxonomy can support the development of valid measurement instruments. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of our framework and taxonomy via a case study that engages with recent conceptual debates about what constitutes a representational harm and how such harms should be measured.

Related papers

• Large Language Models as Quasi-crystals: Coherence Without Repetition in Generative Text [0.0]
  essay proposes an analogy between large language models (LLMs) and quasicrystals, systems that exhibit global coherence without periodic repetition, generated through local constraints. Drawing on the history of quasicrystals, it highlights an alternative mode of coherence in generative language: constraint-based organization without repetition or symbolic intent. This essay aims to reframe the current discussion around large language models, not by rejecting existing methods, but by suggesting an additional axis of interpretation grounded in structure rather than semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-16T11:27:47Z)
• Gumbel Counterfactual Generation From Language Models [64.55296662926919]
  We show that counterfactual reasoning is conceptually distinct from interventions.<n>We propose a framework for generating true string counterfactuals.<n>We show that the approach produces meaningful counterfactuals while at the same time showing that commonly used intervention techniques have considerable undesired side effects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T17:57:30Z)
• Towards a Harms Taxonomy of AI Likeness Generation [0.0]
  Generative artificial intelligence models, when trained on a sufficient number of a person's images, can replicate their identifying features in a photorealistic manner. This paper explores philosophical and policy issues surrounding generated likeness. We present a taxonomy of harms associated with generated likeness, derived from a comprehensive meta-analysis of relevant literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-29T16:00:42Z)
• Beyond Behaviorist Representational Harms: A Plan for Measurement and Mitigation [1.7355698649527407]
  This study focuses on an examination of current definitions of representational harms to discern what is included and what is not. Our work highlights the unique vulnerabilities of large language models to perpetrating representational harms. The overarching aim of this research is to establish a framework for broadening the definition of representational harms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T00:54:10Z)
• Natural Language Decompositions of Implicit Content Enable Better Text Representations [52.992875653864076]
  We introduce a method for the analysis of text that takes implicitly communicated content explicitly into account. We use a large language model to produce sets of propositions that are inferentially related to the text that has been observed. Our results suggest that modeling the meanings behind observed language, rather than the literal text alone, is a valuable direction for NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T23:45:20Z)
• HyperMiner: Topic Taxonomy Mining with Hyperbolic Embedding [54.52651110749165]
  We present a novel framework that introduces hyperbolic embeddings to represent words and topics. With the tree-likeness property of hyperbolic space, the underlying semantic hierarchy can be better exploited to mine more interpretable topics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-16T02:54:17Z)
• A Causal Analysis of Harm [18.7822411439221]
  There is a growing need for a legal and regulatory framework to address when and how autonomous systems harm someone. This paper formally defines a qualitative notion of harm that uses causal models and is based on a well-known definition of actual causality. We show that our definition is able to handle the examples from the literature, and illustrate its importance for reasoning about situations involving autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-11T10:36:24Z)
• Exploring Discourse Structures for Argument Impact Classification [48.909640432326654]
  This paper empirically shows that the discourse relations between two arguments along the context path are essential factors for identifying the persuasive power of an argument. We propose DisCOC to inject and fuse the sentence-level structural information with contextualized features derived from large-scale language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T06:49:19Z)
• Thinking About Causation: A Causal Language with Epistemic Operators [58.720142291102135]
  We extend the notion of a causal model with a representation of the state of an agent. On the side of the object language, we add operators to express knowledge and the act of observing new information. We provide a sound and complete axiomatization of the logic, and discuss the relation of this framework to causal team semantics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-30T12:16:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.