Medical large language models are easily distracted

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.01201v1
• Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2025 21:34:01 GMT
• Title: Medical large language models are easily distracted
• Authors: Krithik Vishwanath, Anton Alyakin, Daniel Alexander Alber, Jin Vivian Lee, Douglas Kondziolka, Eric Karl Oermann,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to transform medicine, but real-world clinical scenarios contain extraneous information that can hinder performance.<n>We developed MedDistractQA, a benchmark using USMLE-style questions embedded with simulated real-world distractions.
• Score: 0.8211696054238238
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have the potential to transform medicine, but real-world clinical scenarios contain extraneous information that can hinder performance. The rise of assistive technologies like ambient dictation, which automatically generates draft notes from live patient encounters, has the potential to introduce additional noise making it crucial to assess the ability of LLM's to filter relevant data. To investigate this, we developed MedDistractQA, a benchmark using USMLE-style questions embedded with simulated real-world distractions. Our findings show that distracting statements (polysemous words with clinical meanings used in a non-clinical context or references to unrelated health conditions) can reduce LLM accuracy by up to 17.9%. Commonly proposed solutions to improve model performance such as retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and medical fine-tuning did not change this effect and in some cases introduced their own confounders and further degraded performance. Our findings suggest that LLMs natively lack the logical mechanisms necessary to distinguish relevant from irrelevant clinical information, posing challenges for real-world applications. MedDistractQA and our results highlights the need for robust mitigation strategies to enhance LLM resilience to extraneous information.

Related papers

• Structured Outputs Enable General-Purpose LLMs to be Medical Experts [50.02627258858336]
  Large language models (LLMs) often struggle with open-ended medical questions.<n>We propose a novel approach utilizing structured medical reasoning.<n>Our approach achieves the highest Factuality Score of 85.8, surpassing fine-tuned models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T05:24:55Z)
• Medicine on the Edge: Comparative Performance Analysis of On-Device LLMs for Clinical Reasoning [1.6010529993238123]
  We benchmark publicly available on-device Large Language Models (LLM) using the AMEGA dataset.<n>Our results indicate that compact general-purpose models like Phi-3 Mini achieve a strong balance between speed and accuracy.<n>We emphasize the need for more efficient inference and models tailored to real-world clinical reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T04:35:55Z)
• LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
  This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment.<n>We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews.<n>Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z)
• Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models in Scientific Claim Detection and Classification [0.0]
  This study evaluates the efficacy of Large Language Models (LLMs) as innovative solutions for mitigating misinformation on platforms like Twitter.<n>LLMs offer a pre-trained, adaptable approach that bypasses the extensive training and overfitting issues associated with traditional machine learning models.<n>We present a comparative analysis of LLMs' performance using a specialized dataset and propose a framework for their application in public health communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-21T05:02:26Z)
• Mitigating Hallucinations of Large Language Models in Medical Information Extraction via Contrastive Decoding [92.32881381717594]
  We introduce ALternate Contrastive Decoding (ALCD) to solve hallucination issues in medical information extraction tasks. ALCD demonstrates significant improvements in resolving hallucination issues compared to conventional decoding methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T07:19:19Z)
• Large Language Model Distilling Medication Recommendation Model [58.94186280631342]
  We harness the powerful semantic comprehension and input-agnostic characteristics of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Our research aims to transform existing medication recommendation methodologies using LLMs.<n>To mitigate this, we have developed a feature-level knowledge distillation technique, which transfers the LLM's proficiency to a more compact model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T08:25:22Z)
• Prompting Large Language Models for Zero-Shot Clinical Prediction with Structured Longitudinal Electronic Health Record Data [7.815738943706123]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are traditionally tailored for natural language processing. This research investigates the adaptability of LLMs, like GPT-4, to EHR data. In response to the longitudinal, sparse, and knowledge-infused nature of EHR data, our prompting approach involves taking into account specific characteristics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T20:14:50Z)
• ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attacks [91.55895047448249]
  This paper presents ReEval, an LLM-based framework using prompt chaining to perturb the original evidence for generating new test cases. We implement ReEval using ChatGPT and evaluate the resulting variants of two popular open-domain QA datasets. Our generated data is human-readable and useful to trigger hallucination in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:37:32Z)
• MKRAG: Medical Knowledge Retrieval Augmented Generation for Medical Question Answering [45.84961106102445]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) often perform poorly on domain-specific tasks such as medical question answering (QA) We propose a comprehensive retrieval strategy to extract medical facts from an external knowledge base, and then inject them into the LLM's query prompt. Our retrieval-augmented Vicuna-7B model exhibited an accuracy improvement from 44.46% to 48.54%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T21:26:03Z)
• Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction [73.6905567014859]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to accelerate clinical curation via few-shot in-context learning. They still struggle with issues regarding accuracy and interpretability, especially in mission-critical domains such as health. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using self-verification, which leverages the LLM to provide provenance for its own extraction and check its own outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T22:05:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.