An Illusion of Progress? Assessing the Current State of Web Agents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.01382v1
• Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 05:51:29 GMT
• Title: An Illusion of Progress? Assessing the Current State of Web Agents
• Authors: Tianci Xue, Weijian Qi, Tianneng Shi, Chan Hee Song, Boyu Gou, Dawn Song, Huan Sun, Yu Su,
• Abstract summary: We conduct a comprehensive and rigorous assessment of the current state of web agents.<n>Results depict a very different picture of the competency of current agents, suggesting over-optimism in previously reported results.<n>We introduce Online-Mind2Web, an online evaluation benchmark consisting of 300 diverse and realistic tasks spanning 136 websites.
• Score: 49.76769323750729
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As digitalization and cloud technologies evolve, the web is becoming increasingly important in the modern society. Autonomous web agents based on large language models (LLMs) hold a great potential in work automation. It is therefore important to accurately measure and monitor the progression of their capabilities. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive and rigorous assessment of the current state of web agents. Our results depict a very different picture of the competency of current agents, suggesting over-optimism in previously reported results. This gap can be attributed to shortcomings in existing benchmarks. We introduce Online-Mind2Web, an online evaluation benchmark consisting of 300 diverse and realistic tasks spanning 136 websites. It enables us to evaluate web agents under a setting that approximates how real users use these agents. To facilitate more scalable evaluation and development, we also develop a novel LLM-as-a-Judge automatic evaluation method and show that it can achieve around 85% agreement with human judgment, substantially higher than existing methods. Finally, we present the first comprehensive comparative analysis of current web agents, highlighting both their strengths and limitations to inspire future research.

Related papers

• REAL: Benchmarking Autonomous Agents on Deterministic Simulations of Real Websites [9.58858258192147]
  We introduce REAL, a benchmark and framework for multi-turn agent evaluations on deterministic simulations of real-world websites. We also release a benchmark consisting of 112 practical tasks that mirror everyday complex user interactions. Our framework supports easy integration of new tasks, reproducible evaluation, and scalable post-training data generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T18:22:55Z)
• The BrowserGym Ecosystem for Web Agent Research [151.90034093362343]
  BrowserGym ecosystem addresses the growing need for efficient evaluation and benchmarking of web agents.<n>We propose an extended BrowserGym-based ecosystem for web agent research, which unifies existing benchmarks from the literature.<n>We conduct the first large-scale, multi-benchmark web agent experiment and compare the performance of 6 state-of-the-art LLMs across 6 popular web agent benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T23:43:59Z)
• AgentOccam: A Simple Yet Strong Baseline for LLM-Based Web Agents [52.13695464678006]
  This study enhances an LLM-based web agent by simply refining its observation and action space. AgentOccam surpasses the previous state-of-the-art and concurrent work by 9.8 (+29.4%) and 5.9 (+15.8%) absolute points respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T17:50:38Z)
• AssistantBench: Can Web Agents Solve Realistic and Time-Consuming Tasks? [50.36826943689364]
  We study whether language agents can perform realistic and time-consuming tasks on the web. We introduce AssistantBench, a new benchmark consisting of 214 realistic tasks that can be automatically evaluated. We find that AssistantBench exposes the limitations of current systems, including language models and retrieval-augmented language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T15:18:45Z)
• Large Language Models Can Self-Improve At Web Agent Tasks [37.17001438055515]
  Large language models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated some capability to navigate novel environments as agents in a zero-shot or few-shot fashion. We explore the extent to which LLMs can self-improve their performance as agents in long-horizon tasks in a complex environment using the WebArena benchmark. We achieve a 31% improvement in task completion rate over the base model on the WebArena benchmark through a self-improvement procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T17:52:36Z)
• Exploring Autonomous Agents through the Lens of Large Language Models: A Review [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are transforming artificial intelligence, enabling autonomous agents to perform diverse tasks across various domains. They face challenges such as multimodality, human value alignment, hallucinations, and evaluation. Evaluation platforms like AgentBench, WebArena, and ToolLLM provide robust methods for assessing these agents in complex scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T22:59:02Z)
• WorkArena: How Capable Are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks? [83.19032025950986]
  We study the use of large language model-based agents for interacting with software via web browsers. WorkArena is a benchmark of 33 tasks based on the widely-used ServiceNow platform. BrowserGym is an environment for the design and evaluation of such agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T14:58:45Z)
• WebVoyager: Building an End-to-End Web Agent with Large Multimodal Models [65.18602126334716]
  Existing web agents typically only handle one input modality and are evaluated only in simplified web simulators or static web snapshots. We introduce WebVoyager, an innovative Large Multimodal Model (LMM) powered web agent that can complete user instructions end-to-end by interacting with real-world websites. We show that WebVoyager achieves a 59.1% task success rate on our benchmark, significantly surpassing the performance of both GPT-4 (All Tools) and the WebVoyager (text-only) setups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T03:33:18Z)
• VisualWebArena: Evaluating Multimodal Agents on Realistic Visual Web Tasks [93.85005277463802]
  VisualWebArena is a benchmark designed to assess the performance of multimodal web agents on realistic tasks. To perform on this benchmark, agents need to accurately process image-text inputs, interpret natural language instructions, and execute actions on websites to accomplish user-defined objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T18:35:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.