Code Red! On the Harmfulness of Applying Off-the-shelf Large Language Models to Programming Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.01850v1
• Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 16:00:14 GMT
• Title: Code Red! On the Harmfulness of Applying Off-the-shelf Large Language Models to Programming Tasks
• Authors: Ali Al-Kaswan, Sebastian Deatc, Begüm Koç, Arie van Deursen, Maliheh Izadi,
• Abstract summary: We develop a taxonomy of potentially harmful software engineering scenarios.<n>We then create a dataset of prompts based on this taxonomy.<n>We investigate the impact of models size, architecture family, and alignment strategies on their tendency to generate harmful content.
• Score: 12.242406234298443
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Nowadays, developers increasingly rely on solutions powered by Large Language Models (LLM) to assist them with their coding tasks. This makes it crucial to align these tools with human values to prevent malicious misuse. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive framework for assessing the potential harmfulness of LLMs within the software engineering domain. We begin by developing a taxonomy of potentially harmful software engineering scenarios and subsequently, create a dataset of prompts based on this taxonomy. To systematically assess the responses, we design and validate an automatic evaluator that classifies the outputs of a variety of LLMs both open-source and closed-source models, as well as general-purpose and code-specific LLMs. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of models size, architecture family, and alignment strategies on their tendency to generate harmful content. The results show significant disparities in the alignment of various LLMs for harmlessness. We find that some models and model families, such as Openhermes, are more harmful than others and that code-specific models do not perform better than their general-purpose counterparts. Notably, some fine-tuned models perform significantly worse than their base-models due to their design choices. On the other side, we find that larger models tend to be more helpful and are less likely to respond with harmful information. These results highlight the importance of targeted alignment strategies tailored to the unique challenges of software engineering tasks and provide a foundation for future work in this critical area.

Related papers

• Forewarned is Forearmed: Leveraging LLMs for Data Synthesis through Failure-Inducing Exploration [90.41908331897639]
  Large language models (LLMs) have significantly benefited from training on diverse, high-quality task-specific data. We present a novel approach, ReverseGen, designed to automatically generate effective training samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T06:43:28Z)
• SIaM: Self-Improving Code-Assisted Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models [54.78329741186446]
  We propose a novel paradigm that uses a code-based critic model to guide steps including question-code data construction, quality control, and complementary evaluation. Experiments across both in-domain and out-of-domain benchmarks in English and Chinese demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed paradigm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-28T06:33:03Z)
• Multi-Agent Planning Using Visual Language Models [2.2369578015657954]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) and Visual Language Models (VLMs) are attracting increasing interest due to their improving performance and applications across various domains and tasks.<n>LLMs andVLMs can produce erroneous results, especially when a deep understanding of the problem domain is required.<n>We propose a multi-agent architecture for embodied task planning that operates without the need for specific data structures as input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-10T08:10:17Z)
• What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study [80.18342600996601]
  Large language models (LLMs) produce code that is shorter yet more complicated as compared to canonical solutions. We develop a taxonomy of bugs for incorrect codes that includes three categories and 12 sub-categories, and analyze the root cause for common bug types. We propose a novel training-free iterative method that introduces self-critique, enabling LLMs to critique and correct their generated code based on bug types and compiler feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T17:27:17Z)
• ORLM: A Customizable Framework in Training Large Models for Automated Optimization Modeling [15.67321902882617]
  We introduce OR-Instruct, a semi-automated data synthesis framework for optimization modeling.<n>We also introduce IndustryOR, the first industrial benchmark for evaluating LLMs in solving practical OR problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T01:55:35Z)
• Enhancing Code Generation Performance of Smaller Models by Distilling the Reasoning Ability of LLMs [36.409470894115074]
  We propose the CodePLAN framework, which aims to transfer LLMs' code generation reasoning capabilities to smaller models. Our approach improves the smaller model's code generation performance by over 130% on the challenging APPS benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T03:09:54Z)
• CogBench: a large language model walks into a psychology lab [12.981407327149679]
  This paper introduces CogBench, a benchmark that includes ten behavioral metrics derived from seven cognitive psychology experiments. We apply CogBench to 35 large language models (LLMs) and analyze this data using statistical multilevel modeling techniques. We find that open-source models are less risk-prone than proprietary models and that fine-tuning on code does not necessarily enhance LLMs' behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T10:43:54Z)
• Adapting Large Language Models for Content Moderation: Pitfalls in Data Engineering and Supervised Fine-tuning [79.53130089003986]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become a feasible solution for handling tasks in various domains. In this paper, we introduce how to fine-tune a LLM model that can be privately deployed for content moderation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T09:09:44Z)
• Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategies [104.32199881187607]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide array of NLP tasks. A promising approach to rectify these flaws is self-correction, where the LLM itself is prompted or guided to fix problems in its own output. This paper presents a comprehensive review of this emerging class of techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-06T18:38:52Z)
• CodeLMSec Benchmark: Systematically Evaluating and Finding Security Vulnerabilities in Black-Box Code Language Models [58.27254444280376]
  Large language models (LLMs) for automatic code generation have achieved breakthroughs in several programming tasks. Training data for these models is usually collected from the Internet (e.g., from open-source repositories) and is likely to contain faults and security vulnerabilities. This unsanitized training data can cause the language models to learn these vulnerabilities and propagate them during the code generation procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T11:54:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.