From Prompts to Templates: A Systematic Prompt Template Analysis for Real-world LLMapps

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02052v2
• Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 08:25:21 GMT
• Title: From Prompts to Templates: A Systematic Prompt Template Analysis for Real-world LLMapps
• Authors: Yuetian Mao, Junjie He, Chunyang Chen,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized human-AI interaction by enabling intuitive task execution through natural language prompts.<n>Small variations in structure or wording can result in substantial differences in output.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of prompt templates in practical LLMapps.
• Score: 20.549178260624043
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized human-AI interaction by enabling intuitive task execution through natural language prompts. Despite their potential, designing effective prompts remains a significant challenge, as small variations in structure or wording can result in substantial differences in output. To address these challenges, LLM-powered applications (LLMapps) rely on prompt templates to simplify interactions, enhance usability, and support specialized tasks such as document analysis, creative content generation, and code synthesis. However, current practices heavily depend on individual expertise and iterative trial-and-error processes, underscoring the need for systematic methods to optimize prompt template design in LLMapps. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of prompt templates in practical LLMapps. We construct a dataset of real-world templates from open-source LLMapps, including those from leading companies like Uber and Microsoft. Through a combination of LLM-driven analysis and human review, we categorize template components and placeholders, analyze their distributions, and identify frequent co-occurrence patterns. Additionally, we evaluate the impact of identified patterns on LLMs' instruction-following performance through sample testing. Our findings provide practical insights on prompt template design for developers, supporting the broader adoption and optimization of LLMapps in industrial settings.

Related papers

• Meeseeks: An Iterative Benchmark Evaluating LLMs Multi-Turn Instruction-Following Ability [3.4354830835082195]
  Meeseeks simulates realistic human-LLM interactions through an iterative feedback process. This design enables models to self-correct based on specific requirement failures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T13:28:19Z)
• From Human Annotation to LLMs: SILICON Annotation Workflow for Management Research [13.818244562506138]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) provide a cost-effective and efficient alternative to human annotation.<n>This paper introduces the SILICON" (Systematic Inference with LLMs for Information Classification and Notation) workflow.<n>The workflow integrates established principles of human annotation with systematic prompt optimization and model selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T02:21:41Z)
• Fine-tuning Multimodal Large Language Models for Product Bundling [53.01642741096356]
  We introduce Bundle-MLLM, a novel framework that fine-tunes large language models (LLMs) through a hybrid item tokenization approach. Specifically, we integrate textual, media, and relational data into a unified tokenization, introducing a soft separation token to distinguish between textual and non-textual tokens. We propose a progressive optimization strategy that fine-tunes LLMs for disentangled objectives: 1) learning bundle patterns and 2) enhancing multimodal semantic understanding specific to product bundling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T13:30:14Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• DOLLmC: DevOps for Large Language model Customization [0.0]
  This research aims to establish a scalable and efficient framework for LLM customization. We propose a robust framework that enhances continuous learning, seamless deployment, and rigorous version control of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-19T15:20:27Z)
• Thinking Fair and Slow: On the Efficacy of Structured Prompts for Debiasing Language Models [14.405446719317291]
  Existing debiasing techniques are typically training-based or require access to the model's internals and output distributions. We evaluate a comprehensive end-user-focused iterative framework of debiasing that applies System 2 thinking processes for prompts to induce logical, reflective, and critical text generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T20:27:58Z)
• Sample Design Engineering: An Empirical Study of What Makes Good Downstream Fine-Tuning Samples for LLMs [23.766782325052418]
  This paper introduces Sample Design Engineering (SDE), a methodical approach to enhancing Large Language Models' post-tuning performance. We conduct a series of in-domain (ID) and out-of-domain (OOD) experiments to assess the impact of various design options on LLMs' downstream performance. We propose an integrated SDE strategy, combining the most effective options, and validate its consistent superiority over sample designs in complex downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-19T17:47:02Z)
• PPTC-R benchmark: Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Large Language Models for PowerPoint Task Completion [96.47420221442397]
  We construct adversarial user instructions by attacking user instructions at sentence, semantic, and multi-language levels. We test 3 closed-source and 4 open-source LLMs using a benchmark that incorporates robustness settings. We find that GPT-4 exhibits the highest performance and strong robustness in our benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-06T15:33:32Z)
• If LLM Is the Wizard, Then Code Is the Wand: A Survey on How Code Empowers Large Language Models to Serve as Intelligent Agents [81.60906807941188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are trained on a combination of natural language and formal language (code) Code translates high-level goals into executable steps, featuring standard syntax, logical consistency, abstraction, and modularity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-01T16:51:20Z)
• Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better In-context Learners [94.89301696512776]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit emerging in-context learning abilities through prompt engineering. The challenge of improving the generalizability and factuality of LLMs in natural language understanding and question answering remains under-explored. We propose a framework that enhances the reliability of LLMs as it: 1) generalizes out-of-distribution data, 2) elucidates how LLMs benefit from discriminative models, and 3) minimizes hallucinations in generative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T07:24:46Z)
• Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedback [127.75419038610455]
  Large language models (LLMs) are able to generate human-like, fluent responses for many downstream tasks. This paper proposes a LLM-Augmenter system, which augments a black-box LLM with a set of plug-and-play modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T18:48:43Z)
• Guiding Large Language Models via Directional Stimulus Prompting [114.84930073977672]
  We introduce Directional Stimulus Prompting, a novel framework for guiding black-box large language models (LLMs) toward specific desired outputs. Instead of directly adjusting LLMs, our method employs a small tunable policy model to generate an auxiliary directional stimulus prompt for each input instance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-22T17:44:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.