The Author Is Sovereign: A Manifesto for Ethical Copyright in the Age of AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02239v1
• Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2025 03:12:42 GMT
• Title: The Author Is Sovereign: A Manifesto for Ethical Copyright in the Age of AI
• Authors: Ricardo Fitas,
• Abstract summary: In the age of AI, authorship is being quietly eroded by algorithmic content scraping, legal gray zones like "fair use," and platforms that profit from creative labor without consent or compensation.<n>This short manifesto proposes a radical alternative: a system in which the author is sovereign of their intellectual domain.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In the age of AI, authorship is being quietly eroded by algorithmic content scraping, legal gray zones like "fair use," and platforms that profit from creative labor without consent or compensation. This short manifesto proposes a radical alternative: a system in which the author is sovereign of their intellectual domain. It presents seven ethical principles that challenge prevailing assumptions about open access, copyright ownership, and the public domain - arguing that voluntary, negotiated consent must replace coercive norms. The text exposes how weakened authorship fuels structural exploitation. In place of reactive solutions, it calls for a new ethic of authorship rooted in consent, dignity, and contractual fairness.

Related papers

• Resource Rational Contractualism Should Guide AI Alignment [69.07915246220985]
  Contractualist alignment proposes grounding decisions in agreements that diverse stakeholders would endorse.<n>We propose Resource-Rationalism: a framework where AI systems approximate the agreements rational parties would form.<n>An RRC-aligned agent would not only operate efficiently, but also be equipped to dynamically adapt to and interpret the ever-changing human social world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T18:57:13Z)
• Unfair Learning: GenAI Exceptionalism and Copyright Law [0.5076419064097734]
  It argues that every legal and substantive argument favoring fair use for GenAI applies equally, if not more so, to humans.<n>It would mean no human would need to pay for virtually any copyright work again.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T16:49:39Z)
• Copyright in AI-generated works: Lessons from recent developments in patent law [0.0]
  In Thaler v The Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, Smith J. held that an AI owner can claim patent ownership over an AI-generated invention based on their ownership and control of the AI system. This paper examines whether the AI-owner approach is a better option for determining copyright ownership of AI-generated works.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T04:16:44Z)
• Technology as uncharted territory: Contextual integrity and the notion of AI as new ethical ground [55.2480439325792]
  I argue that efforts to promote responsible and ethical AI can inadvertently contribute to and seemingly legitimize this disregard for established contextual norms.<n>I question the current narrow prioritization in AI ethics of moral innovation over moral preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T15:36:13Z)
• ©Plug-in Authorization for Human Content Copyright Protection in Text-to-Image Model [71.47762442337948]
  State-of-the-art models create high-quality content without crediting original creators.<n>We propose the copyright Plug-in Authorization framework, introducing three operations: addition, extraction, and combination.<n>Experiments in artist-style replication and cartoon IP recreation demonstrate copyright plug-ins' effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T07:48:00Z)
• Uncertain Boundaries: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Copyright Issues in Generative AI [2.2780130786778665]
  Generative AI models generating near-replicas of copyrighted material highlight the need to adapt current legal frameworks.<n>Most existing research on copyright in AI takes a purely computer science or law-based approach.<n>This survey adopts a comprehensive approach synthesizing insights from law, policy, economics, and computer science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-31T22:10:01Z)
• Between Copyright and Computer Science: The Law and Ethics of Generative AI [1.534667887016089]
  Copyright and computer science continue to intersect and clash, but they can coexist. This Article shows that, contrary to some scholars' views, fair use law does not bless all ways that someone can gain access to copyrighted material. The copyright industry claims, however, that almost all uses of copyrighted material must be compensated, even for non-expressive uses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-24T16:20:44Z)
• Copyright Protection in Generative AI: A Technical Perspective [58.84343394349887]
  Generative AI has witnessed rapid advancement in recent years, expanding their capabilities to create synthesized content such as text, images, audio, and code. The high fidelity and authenticity of contents generated by these Deep Generative Models (DGMs) have sparked significant copyright concerns. This work delves into this issue by providing a comprehensive overview of copyright protection from a technical perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T04:00:33Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• A Dataset and Benchmark for Copyright Infringement Unlearning from Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [52.49582606341111]
  Copyright law confers creators the exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and monetize their creative works. Recent progress in text-to-image generation has introduced formidable challenges to copyright enforcement. We introduce a novel pipeline that harmonizes CLIP, ChatGPT, and diffusion models to curate a dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T11:14:01Z)
• Training Is Everything: Artificial Intelligence, Copyright, and Fair Training [9.653656920225858]
  Authors: Companies that use such content to train their AI engine often believe such usage should be considered "fair use" Authors: Copyright owners, as well as their supporters, consider the incorporation of copyrighted works into training sets for AI to constitute misappropriation of owners' intellectual property. We identify both strong and spurious arguments on both sides of this debate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T04:01:00Z)
• Foundation Models and Fair Use [96.04664748698103]
  In the U.S. and other countries, copyrighted content may be used to build foundation models without incurring liability due to the fair use doctrine. In this work, we survey the potential risks of developing and deploying foundation models based on copyrighted content. We discuss technical mitigations that can help foundation models stay in line with fair use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:58:40Z)
• Hacia los Comit\'es de \'Etica en Inteligencia Artificial [68.8204255655161]
  It is priority to create the rules and specialized organizations that can oversight the following of such rules. This work proposes the creation, at the universities, of Ethical Committees or Commissions specialized on Artificial Intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-11T23:48:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.