Explaining Low Perception Model Competency with High-Competency Counterfactuals

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05254v1
• Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2025 16:46:52 GMT
• Title: Explaining Low Perception Model Competency with High-Competency Counterfactuals
• Authors: Sara Pohland, Claire Tomlin,
• Abstract summary: We develop five novel methods to generate high-competency counterfactual images.<n>We evaluate Reco, LGD, and LNN to be the most promising methods for counterfactual generation.<n>We find that the inclusion of a counterfactual image in the language model query greatly increases the ability of the model to generate an accurate explanation.
• Score: 0.10923877073891446
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: There exist many methods to explain how an image classification model generates its decision, but very little work has explored methods to explain why a classifier might lack confidence in its prediction. As there are various reasons the classifier might lose confidence, it would be valuable for this model to not only indicate its level of uncertainty but also explain why it is uncertain. Counterfactual images have been used to visualize changes that could be made to an image to generate a different classification decision. In this work, we explore the use of counterfactuals to offer an explanation for low model competency--a generalized form of predictive uncertainty that measures confidence. Toward this end, we develop five novel methods to generate high-competency counterfactual images, namely Image Gradient Descent (IGD), Feature Gradient Descent (FGD), Autoencoder Reconstruction (Reco), Latent Gradient Descent (LGD), and Latent Nearest Neighbors (LNN). We evaluate these methods across two unique datasets containing images with six known causes for low model competency and find Reco, LGD, and LNN to be the most promising methods for counterfactual generation. We further evaluate how these three methods can be utilized by pre-trained Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) to generate language explanations for low model competency. We find that the inclusion of a counterfactual image in the language model query greatly increases the ability of the model to generate an accurate explanation for the cause of low model competency, thus demonstrating the utility of counterfactual images in explaining low perception model competency.

Related papers

• Understanding the Dependence of Perception Model Competency on Regions in an Image [0.10923877073891446]
  We show five methods for identifying regions in the input image contributing to low model competency. We find that the competency gradients and reconstruction loss methods show great promise in identifying regions associated with low model competency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T08:50:13Z)
• Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations [53.15438489398938]
  Large language models (LLMs) can reach and even surpass human-level accuracy on a variety of benchmarks, but their overconfidence in incorrect responses is still a well-documented failure mode. We propose a framework for measuring an LLM's uncertainty with respect to the distribution of generated explanations for an answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T16:35:30Z)
• DEEM: Diffusion Models Serve as the Eyes of Large Language Models for Image Perception [66.88792390480343]
  We propose DEEM, a simple but effective approach that utilizes the generative feedback of diffusion models to align the semantic distributions of the image encoder.<n>DEEM exhibits enhanced robustness and a superior capacity to alleviate model hallucinations while utilizing fewer trainable parameters, less pre-training data, and a smaller base model size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T05:46:04Z)
• DiG-IN: Diffusion Guidance for Investigating Networks -- Uncovering Classifier Differences Neuron Visualisations and Visual Counterfactual Explanations [35.458709912618176]
  Deep learning has led to huge progress in complex image classification tasks like ImageNet, unexpected failure modes, e.g. via spurious features. For safety-critical tasks the black-box nature of their decisions is problematic, and explanations or at least methods which make decisions plausible are needed urgently. We address these problems by generating images that optimize a classifier-derived objective using a framework for guided image generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T17:35:29Z)
• Traditional Classification Neural Networks are Good Generators: They are Competitive with DDPMs and GANs [104.72108627191041]
  We show that conventional neural network classifiers can generate high-quality images comparable to state-of-the-art generative models. We propose a mask-based reconstruction module to make semantic gradients-aware to synthesize plausible images. We show that our method is also applicable to text-to-image generation by regarding image-text foundation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-27T11:25:35Z)
• Explain, Edit, and Understand: Rethinking User Study Design for Evaluating Model Explanations [97.91630330328815]
  We conduct a crowdsourcing study, where participants interact with deception detection models that have been trained to distinguish between genuine and fake hotel reviews. We observe that for a linear bag-of-words model, participants with access to the feature coefficients during training are able to cause a larger reduction in model confidence in the testing phase when compared to the no-explanation control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-17T18:29:56Z)
• Who Explains the Explanation? Quantitatively Assessing Feature Attribution Methods [0.0]
  We propose a novel evaluation metric -- the Focus -- designed to quantify the faithfulness of explanations. We show the robustness of the metric through randomization experiments, and then use Focus to evaluate and compare three popular explainability techniques. Our results find LRP and GradCAM to be consistent and reliable, while the latter remains most competitive even when applied to poorly performing models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-28T07:10:24Z)
• Beyond Trivial Counterfactual Explanations with Diverse Valuable Explanations [64.85696493596821]
  In computer vision applications, generative counterfactual methods indicate how to perturb a model's input to change its prediction. We propose a counterfactual method that learns a perturbation in a disentangled latent space that is constrained using a diversity-enforcing loss. Our model improves the success rate of producing high-quality valuable explanations when compared to previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T12:57:34Z)
• Counterfactual Generative Networks [59.080843365828756]
  We propose to decompose the image generation process into independent causal mechanisms that we train without direct supervision. By exploiting appropriate inductive biases, these mechanisms disentangle object shape, object texture, and background. We show that the counterfactual images can improve out-of-distribution with a marginal drop in performance on the original classification task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T10:23:12Z)
• Explainable Image Classification with Evidence Counterfactual [0.0]
  We introduce SEDC as a model-agnostic instance-level explanation method for image classification. For a given image, SEDC searches a small set of segments that, in case of removal, alters the classification. We compare SEDC(-T) with popular feature importance methods such as LRP, LIME and SHAP, and we describe how the mentioned importance ranking issues are addressed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-16T08:02:48Z)
• Plausible Counterfactuals: Auditing Deep Learning Classifiers with Realistic Adversarial Examples [84.8370546614042]
  Black-box nature of Deep Learning models has posed unanswered questions about what they learn from data. Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) and multi-objectives are used to furnish a plausible attack to the audited model. Its utility is showcased within a human face classification task, unveiling the enormous potential of the proposed framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-25T11:08:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.