Towards Evidence-Based Tech Hiring Pipelines

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06387v1
• Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2025 19:13:32 GMT
• Title: Towards Evidence-Based Tech Hiring Pipelines
• Authors: Chris Brown, Swanand Vaishampayan,
• Abstract summary: This paper outlines challenges in current hiring practices and present future directions to promote fair and evidence-based evaluations in tech hiring pipelines.<n>Our vision aims to enhance outcomes for candidates and assessments for employers to enhance the workforce in the tech industry.
• Score: 4.991581599091051
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Software engineers are responsible for developing, maintaining, and innovating software. To hire software engineers, organizations employ a tech hiring pipeline. This process typically consists of a series of steps to evaluate the extent to which applicants meet job requirements and can effectively contribute to a development team -- such as resume screenings and technical interviews. However, research highlights substantial flaws with current tech hiring practices -- such as bias from stress-inducing assessments. As the landscape of software engineering (SE) is dramatically changing, assessing the technical proficiency and abilities of software engineers is an increasingly crucial task to meet technological needs and demands. In this paper, we outline challenges in current hiring practices and present future directions to promote fair and evidence-based evaluations in tech hiring pipelines. Our vision aims to enhance outcomes for candidates and assessments for employers to enhance the workforce in the tech industry.

Related papers

• Challenges and Paths Towards AI for Software Engineering [55.95365538122656]
  We discuss progress in AI for software engineering in threefold manner.<n>First, we provide a structured taxonomy of concrete tasks in AI for software engineering.<n>Second, we outline several key bottlenecks that limit current approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T17:17:57Z)
• Deep Learning-based Software Engineering: Progress, Challenges, and Opportunities [29.934835831037347]
  We present the first task-oriented survey on deep learning-based software engineering. It covers twelve major software engineering subareas significantly impacted by deep learning techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T00:46:00Z)
• Please do not go: understanding turnover of software engineers from different perspectives [5.959478613390186]
  We identify 19 different reasons for software engineers' turnover and 18 more efficient strategies used in the software development industry to reduce it. Our findings provide several implications for industry and academia, which can drive future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-29T01:31:06Z)
• Making Software Development More Diverse and Inclusive: Key Themes, Challenges, and Future Directions [50.545824691484796]
  We identify six themes around the theme challenges and opportunities to improve Software Developer Diversity and Inclusion (SDDI)<n>We identify benefits, harms, and future research directions for the four main themes.<n>We discuss the remaining two themes, Artificial Intelligence & SDDI and AI & Computer Science education, which have a cross-cutting effect on the other themes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T16:18:11Z)
• Charting a Path to Efficient Onboarding: The Role of Software Visualization [49.1574468325115]
  The present study aims to explore the familiarity of managers, leaders, and developers with software visualization tools. This approach incorporated quantitative and qualitative analyses of data collected from practitioners using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T21:30:45Z)
• Toward Optimal Psychological Functioning in AI-driven Software Engineering Tasks: The SEWELL-CARE Assessment Framework [0.9208007322096533]
  SEWELL-CARE is a conceptual framework designed to assess AI-driven software engineering tasks from multiple perspectives. By emphasizing both technical and human dimensions, our framework provides a nuanced evaluation that goes beyond traditional technical metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T15:44:07Z)
• Reusability Challenges of Scientific Workflows: A Case Study for Galaxy [56.78572674167333]
  This study examined the reusability of existing and exposed several challenges. The challenges preventing reusability include tool upgrading, tool support, design flaws, incomplete, failure to load a workflow, etc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T20:17:43Z)
• Artificial Intelligence Impact On The Labour Force -- Searching For The Analytical Skills Of The Future Software Engineers [0.0]
  This systematic literature review aims to investigate the impact of artificial intelligence on the labour force in software engineering. It focuses on the skills needed for future software engineers, the impact of AI on the demand for software engineering skills, and the future of work for software engineers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-26T03:49:53Z)
• Empowered and Embedded: Ethics and Agile Processes [60.63670249088117]
  We argue that ethical considerations need to be embedded into the (agile) software development process. We put emphasis on the possibility to implement ethical deliberations in already existing and well established agile software development processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-15T11:14:03Z)
• Data-Driven Aerospace Engineering: Reframing the Industry with Machine Learning [49.367020832638794]
  The aerospace industry is poised to capitalize on big data and machine learning. Recent trends will be explored in context of critical challenges in design, manufacturing, verification and services.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-24T22:40:26Z)
• Machine Learning for Software Engineering: A Systematic Mapping [73.30245214374027]
  The software development industry is rapidly adopting machine learning for transitioning modern day software systems towards highly intelligent and self-learning systems. No comprehensive study exists that explores the current state-of-the-art on the adoption of machine learning across software engineering life cycle stages. This study introduces a machine learning for software engineering (MLSE) taxonomy classifying the state-of-the-art machine learning techniques according to their applicability to various software engineering life cycle stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-27T11:56:56Z)
• Understanding What Software Engineers Are Working on -- The Work-Item Prediction Challenge [0.0]
  Understanding what a software engineer (a developer, an incident responder, a production engineer, etc.) is working on is a challenging problem. In this paper, we explain the corresponding 'work-item prediction challenge' on the grounds of representative scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-13T19:59:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.