NeedleInATable: Exploring Long-Context Capability of Large Language Models towards Long-Structured Tables

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06560v2
• Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 03:31:02 GMT
• Title: NeedleInATable: Exploring Long-Context Capability of Large Language Models towards Long-Structured Tables
• Authors: Lanrui Wang, Mingyu Zheng, Hongyin Tang, Zheng Lin, Yanan Cao, Jingang Wang, Xunliang Cai, Weiping Wang,
• Abstract summary: textscNeedleInATable (NIAT) treats each table cell as a needle'' and requires models to extract the target cell based on cell locations or lookup questions.<n>Our data, code and models will be released to facilitate future research.
• Score: 32.9031799179503
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Processing structured tabular data, particularly large and lengthy tables, constitutes a fundamental yet challenging task for large language models (LLMs). However, existing long-context benchmarks like Needle-in-a-Haystack primarily focus on unstructured text, neglecting the challenge of diverse structured tables. Meanwhile, previous tabular benchmarks mainly consider downstream tasks that require high-level reasoning abilities, and overlook models' underlying fine-grained perception of individual table cells, which is crucial for practical and robust LLM-based table applications. To address this gap, we introduce \textsc{NeedleInATable} (NIAT), a new long-context tabular benchmark that treats each table cell as a ``needle'' and requires models to extract the target cell based on cell locations or lookup questions. Our comprehensive evaluation of various LLMs and multimodal LLMs reveals a substantial performance gap between popular downstream tabular tasks and the simpler NIAT task, suggesting that they may rely on dataset-specific correlations or shortcuts to obtain better benchmark results but lack truly robust long-context understanding towards structured tables. Furthermore, we demonstrate that using synthesized NIAT training data can effectively improve performance on both NIAT task and downstream tabular tasks, which validates the importance of NIAT capability for LLMs' genuine table understanding ability. Our data, code and models will be released to facilitate future research.

Related papers

• TReB: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Table Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models [30.26407735827857]
  Reasoning with table-structured data poses significant challenges for large language models (LLMs)<n>We present a comprehensive table reasoning evolution benchmark, TReB, which measures both shallow table understanding abilities and deep table reasoning abilities.<n>We create an evaluation framework to robustly measure table reasoning capabilities with three distinct inference modes, TCoT, PoT and ICoT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T09:02:04Z)
• LLM-Symbolic Integration for Robust Temporal Tabular Reasoning [69.27153114778748]
  We introduce TempTabQA-C, a synthetic dataset designed for systematic and controlled evaluations.<n>This structured approach allows Large Language Models (LLMs) to generate and executesql queries, enhancing generalization and mitigating biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T05:14:04Z)
• Multimodal Tabular Reasoning with Privileged Structured Information [67.40011423365712]
  We introduce TabUlar Reasoning with Bridged infOrmation (sc Turbo)<n>sc Turbo benefits from a structure-aware reasoning trace generator based on DeepSeek-R1.<n>sc Turbo achieves state-of-the-art performance ($+7.2%$ vs. previous SOTA) across multiple datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T15:46:30Z)
• WildLong: Synthesizing Realistic Long-Context Instruction Data at Scale [86.25450054683172]
  WildLong extracts meta-information from real user queries to produce scalable data.<n>It supports multi-document reasoning, such as cross-document comparison and aggregation.<n>It surpasses existing open-source long-context-optimized models across benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-23T18:59:09Z)
• Benchmarking Table Comprehension In The Wild [9.224698222634789]
  TableQuest is a new benchmark designed to evaluate the holistic table comprehension capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>We experiment with 7 state-of-the-art models, and find that despite reasonable accuracy in locating facts, they often falter when required to execute more sophisticated reasoning or multi-step calculations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-13T05:52:37Z)
• MAmmoTH-VL: Eliciting Multimodal Reasoning with Instruction Tuning at Scale [66.73529246309033]
  multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown significant potential in a broad range of multimodal tasks.<n>Existing instruction-tuning datasets only provide phrase-level answers without any intermediate rationales.<n>We introduce a scalable and cost-effective method to construct a large-scale multimodal instruction-tuning dataset with rich intermediate rationales.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T18:14:24Z)
• FltLM: An Intergrated Long-Context Large Language Model for Effective Context Filtering and Understanding [32.197113821638936]
  We propose a novel integrated Long-Context Large Language Model (FltLM) FltLM incorporates a context filter with a soft mask mechanism, identifying and dynamically excluding irrelevant content to concentrate on pertinent information. Experimental results demonstrate that FltLM significantly outperforms supervised fine-tuning and retrieval-based methods in complex QA scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T13:47:50Z)
• TableRAG: Million-Token Table Understanding with Language Models [53.039560091592215]
  TableRAG is a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework specifically designed for LM-based table understanding.<n>TableRAG leverages query expansion combined with schema and cell retrieval to pinpoint crucial information before providing it to the LMs.<n>Our results demonstrate that TableRAG achieves the highest retrieval quality, leading to the new state-of-the-art performance on large-scale table understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T04:15:02Z)
• Enhancing Temporal Understanding in LLMs for Semi-structured Tables [50.59009084277447]
  We conduct a comprehensive analysis of temporal datasets to pinpoint the specific limitations of large language models (LLMs) Our investigation leads to enhancements in TempTabQA, a dataset specifically designed for temporal temporal question answering. We introduce a novel approach, C.L.E.A.R. to strengthen LLM capabilities in this domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T20:13:10Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• ALTER: Augmentation for Large-Table-Based Reasoning [5.164923314261229]
  ALTER(Augmentation for Large-Table-Based Reasoning) is a framework designed to harness the latent augmentation potential in both free-form natural language (NL) questions. By utilizing only a small subset of relevant data from the table, ALTER achieves outstanding performance on table-based reasoning benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T12:34:45Z)
• Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More? [54.667202878390526]
  Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases. We introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning. Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T00:28:58Z)
• On the Robustness of Language Models for Tabular Question Answering [7.486549276995143]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been shown to tackle table comprehension tasks without specific training.<n>We evaluate the robustness of LLMs on Wikipedia-based textbfWTQ, financial report-based textbfTAT-QA, and scientific claims-based textbfSCITAB, TQA datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T15:41:15Z)
• Long Context Alignment with Short Instructions and Synthesized Positions [56.1267385315404]
  This paper introduces Step-Skipping Alignment (SkipAlign) It is a new technique designed to enhance the long-context capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) With a careful selection of the base model and alignment datasets, SkipAlign with only 6B parameters achieves it's best performance and comparable with strong baselines like GPT-3.5-Turbo-16K on LongBench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T01:56:22Z)
• TAP4LLM: Table Provider on Sampling, Augmenting, and Packing Semi-structured Data for Large Language Model Reasoning [55.33939289989238]
  We propose TAP4LLM as a versatile pre-processor suite for leveraging large language models (LLMs) in table-based tasks effectively. It covers several distinct components: (1) table sampling to decompose large tables into manageable sub-tables based on query semantics, (2) table augmentation to enhance tables with additional knowledge from external sources or models, and (3) table packing & serialization to convert tables into various formats suitable for LLMs' understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-14T15:37:04Z)
• LooGLE: Can Long-Context Language Models Understand Long Contexts? [46.143956498529796]
  LooGLE is a benchmark for large language models' long context understanding. It features relatively new documents post-2022, with over 24,000 tokens per document and 6,000 newly generated questions spanning diverse domains. The evaluation of eight state-of-the-art LLMs on LooGLE revealed key findings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-08T01:45:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.