Open Problems and a Hypothetical Path Forward in LLM Knowledge Paradigms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.06823v1
• Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 12:31:25 GMT
• Title: Open Problems and a Hypothetical Path Forward in LLM Knowledge Paradigms
• Authors: Xiaotian Ye, Mengqi Zhang, Shu Wu,
• Abstract summary: This blog post highlights three critical open problems limiting model capabilities.<n>We propose a hypothetical paradigm based on Contextual Knowledge Scaling.<n>Evidence suggests this approach holds potential to address current shortcomings, serving as our vision for future model paradigms.
• Score: 14.222205207889543
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Knowledge is fundamental to the overall capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). The knowledge paradigm of a model, which dictates how it encodes and utilizes knowledge, significantly affects its performance. Despite the continuous development of LLMs under existing knowledge paradigms, issues within these frameworks continue to constrain model potential. This blog post highlight three critical open problems limiting model capabilities: (1) challenges in knowledge updating for LLMs, (2) the failure of reverse knowledge generalization (the reversal curse), and (3) conflicts in internal knowledge. We review recent progress made in addressing these issues and discuss potential general solutions. Based on observations in these areas, we propose a hypothetical paradigm based on Contextual Knowledge Scaling, and further outline implementation pathways that remain feasible within contemporary techniques. Evidence suggests this approach holds potential to address current shortcomings, serving as our vision for future model paradigms. This blog post aims to provide researchers with a brief overview of progress in LLM knowledge systems, while provide inspiration for the development of next-generation model architectures.

Related papers

• A Call for New Recipes to Enhance Spatial Reasoning in MLLMs [85.67171333213301]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance in general vision-language tasks. Recent studies have exposed critical limitations in their spatial reasoning capabilities. This deficiency in spatial reasoning significantly constrains MLLMs' ability to interact effectively with the physical world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T11:48:39Z)
• Towards Understanding How Knowledge Evolves in Large Vision-Language Models [55.82918299608732]
  We investigate how multimodal knowledge evolves and eventually induces natural languages in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) We identify two key nodes in knowledge evolution: the critical layers and the mutation layers, dividing the evolution process into three stages: rapid evolution, stabilization, and mutation. Our research is the first to reveal the trajectory of knowledge evolution in LVLMs, providing a fresh perspective for understanding their underlying mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T17:35:37Z)
• When Continue Learning Meets Multimodal Large Language Model: A Survey [7.250878248686215]
  Fine-tuning MLLMs for specific tasks often causes performance degradation in the model's prior knowledge domain. This review paper presents an overview and analysis of 440 research papers in this area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T03:39:10Z)
• How Do LLMs Acquire New Knowledge? A Knowledge Circuits Perspective on Continual Pre-Training [92.88889953768455]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) face a critical gap in understanding how they internalize new knowledge. We identify computational subgraphs that facilitate knowledge storage and processing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T16:55:43Z)
• Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models: A Survey [75.67848187449418]
  Large language models (LLMs) store vast amount of knowledge in their parameters, but they still have limitations in the memorization and utilization of certain knowledge.<n>This highlights the critical need to understand the knowledge boundary of LLMs, a concept that remains inadequately defined in existing research.<n>We propose a comprehensive definition of the LLM knowledge boundary and introduce a formalized taxonomy categorizing knowledge into four distinct types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T02:14:02Z)
• Coding for Intelligence from the Perspective of Category [66.14012258680992]
  Coding targets compressing and reconstructing data, and intelligence. Recent trends demonstrate the potential homogeneity of these two fields. We propose a novel problem of Coding for Intelligence from the category theory view.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T07:05:44Z)
• A Comprehensive Study of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models [82.65729336401027]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown extraordinary capabilities in understanding and generating text that closely mirrors human communication. This paper defines the knowledge editing problem and provides a comprehensive review of cutting-edge approaches. We introduce a new benchmark, KnowEdit, for a comprehensive empirical evaluation of representative knowledge editing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T16:54:58Z)
• Knowledge Unlearning for LLMs: Tasks, Methods, and Challenges [11.228131492745842]
  Large language models (LLMs) have spurred a new research paradigm in natural language processing. Despite their excellent capability in knowledge-based question answering and reasoning, their potential to retain faulty or even harmful knowledge poses risks of malicious application. Knowledge unlearning, derived from analogous studies on machine unlearning, presents a promising avenue to address this concern.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-27T12:37:51Z)
• Challenges and Contributing Factors in the Utilization of Large Language Models (LLMs) [10.039589841455136]
  This review explores the issue of domain specificity, where large language models (LLMs) may struggle to provide precise answers to specialized questions within niche fields. It's suggested to diversify training data, fine-tune models, enhance transparency and interpretability, and incorporate ethics and fairness training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T08:13:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.