DeepGreen: Effective LLM-Driven Green-washing Monitoring System Designed for Empirical Testing -- Evidence from China
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.07733v1
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:29:07 GMT
- Title: DeepGreen: Effective LLM-Driven Green-washing Monitoring System Designed for Empirical Testing -- Evidence from China
- Abstract summary: DeepGreen preliminarily identifies potential green keywords in financial statements and then assesses their implementation degree.<n>We extract 204 financial statements of 68 companies from A-share market over three years, comprising 89,893 words, and analyse them through DeepGreen.<n>Our analysis, supported by violin plots and K-means clustering, reveals insights and validates the variable against the Huazheng ESG rating.
- Score: 0.9999629695552195
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: This paper proposes DeepGreen, an Large Language Model Driven (LLM-Driven) system for detecting corporate green-washing behaviour. Utilizing dual-layer LLM analysis, DeepGreen preliminarily identifies potential green keywords in financial statements and then assesses their implementation degree via iterative semantic analysis of LLM. A core variable GreenImplement is derived from the ratio from the two layers' output. We extract 204 financial statements of 68 companies from A-share market over three years, comprising 89,893 words, and analyse them through DeepGreen. Our analysis, supported by violin plots and K-means clustering, reveals insights and validates the variable against the Huazheng ESG rating. It offers a novel perspective for regulatory agencies and investors, serving as a proactive monitoring tool that complements traditional methods.Empirical tests show that green implementation can significantly boost the asset return rate of companies, but there is heterogeneity in scale. Small and medium-sized companies have limited contribution to asset return via green implementation, so there is a stronger motivation for green-washing.
Related papers
- Beyond the Syntax: Do Security Experts Trust LLMs for NIDS Rule Engineering? [70.17374586573033]
This paper presents a human-centered investigation into Large Language Models (LLMs)-based NIDS rule engineering.<n>Our evaluation reveals a syntax-semantics paradox: although LLMs generate syntactically correct rules, experts find them only partially deployable.<n>While large-scale models consistently produce syntactically valid rules, small models are largely ineffective for IDS rule generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-07T07:09:56Z) - ComplexMCP: Evaluation of LLM Agents in Dynamic, Interdependent, and Large-Scale Tool Sandbox [61.862814740220806]
$textbfComplexMCP$ is a benchmark designed to evaluate agents in rigorous conditions.<n>Built on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), $textbfComplexMCP$ provides over 300 meticulously tested tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-11T16:20:51Z) - Green Architectural Tactics in ML-enabled Systems: An LLM-based Repository Mining Study [11.880262511710642]
Green AI has emerged to address these issues by promoting efficiency without sacrificing accuracy.<n>We conduct a mining software repository study on 205 open-source ML projects on GitHub.<n>Our findings confirm that green tactics reported in the literature are used in practice, although adoption rates vary.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-19T10:34:53Z) - The Spillover Effects of Peer AI Rinsing on Corporate Green Innovation [0.0]
This paper employs large language models to conduct semantic analysis on the text of annual reports from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2006 to 2024.<n>The research reveals that corporate AI washing exerts a significant crowding-out effect on green innovation.<n>This paper proposes that the government should design targeted support tools to 'enhance market returns and alleviate financing constraints'
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-19T02:22:08Z) - iGRPO: Self-Feedback-Driven LLM Reasoning [88.83313431248473]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in solving complex mathematical problems, yet they still fall short of producing accurate and consistent solutions.<n>We introduce Iterative Group Relative Policy Optimization (iGRPO), a two-stage extension of GRPO that adds dynamic self-conditioning through model-generated drafts.<n>Under matched rollout budgets, iGRPO consistently outperforms GRPO across base models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-09T18:45:11Z) - EmeraldMind: A Knowledge Graph-Augmented Framework for Greenwashing Detection [3.5657565086740757]
We introduce EmeraldMind, a fact-centric framework integrating a domain-specific knowledge graph with retrieval-augmented generation to automate greenwashing detection.<n>The framework delivers justification-centric classifications, presenting transparent, evidence-backed verdicts and abstaining responsibly when claims cannot be verified.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-12T12:06:36Z) - Repurposing Synthetic Data for Fine-grained Search Agent Supervision [81.95597592711688]
LLM-based search agents are increasingly trained on entity-centric synthetic data.<n> prevailing training methods discard this rich entity information, relying instead on sparse, outcome-based rewards.<n>We introduce Entity-aware Group Relative Policy Optimization (E-GRPO), a novel framework that formulates a dense entity-aware reward function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-28T17:50:40Z) - FinLFQA: Evaluating Attributed Text Generation of LLMs in Financial Long-Form Question Answering [57.43420753842626]
FinLFQA is a benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of Large Language Models to generate long-form answers to complex financial questions.<n>We provide an automatic evaluation framework covering both answer quality and attribution quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-07T20:06:15Z) - Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) in Financial NLP: A Comparative Study on Financial Report Analysis [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide variety of Financial Natural Language Processing (FinNLP) tasks.<n>This study conducts a thorough comparative evaluation of five leading LLMs, GPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini and DeepSeek, using 10-K filings from the 'Magnificent Seven' technology companies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-24T20:10:27Z) - The Other Side of the Coin: Exploring Fairness in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [73.16564415490113]
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) by retrieving relevant document from external knowledge sources.
We propose two approaches, FairFT and FairFilter, to mitigate the fairness issues introduced by RAG for small-scale LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-11T10:17:10Z) - Judging It, Washing It: Scoring and Greenwashing Corporate Climate Disclosures using Large Language Models [2.7898966850590625]
We investigate the use of the LLM-as-a-Judge (LLMJ) methodology for scoring company-submitted reports on emissions reduction targets and progress.<n>We probe the behavior of an LLM when it is prompted to greenwash a response subject to accuracy and length constraints.<n>We find that two LLMJ scoring systems, numerical rating and pairwise comparison, are effective in distinguishing high-performing companies from others.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-20T23:23:45Z) - Towards Robust ESG Analysis Against Greenwashing Risks: Aspect-Action Analysis with Cross-Category Generalization [27.060978828050352]
A3CG is a novel dataset to improve robustness of ESG analysis amid the prevalence of greenwashing.
By explicitly linking sustainability aspects with their associated actions, A3CG facilitates a more fine-grained and transparent evaluation of sustainability claims.
This ensures robust model performance in aspect-action analysis even when companies change their reports to selectively favor certain sustainability areas.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-20T03:01:08Z) - The Dual-use Dilemma in LLMs: Do Empowering Ethical Capacities Make a Degraded Utility? [54.18519360412294]
Large Language Models (LLMs) must balance between rejecting harmful requests for safety and accommodating legitimate ones for utility.<n>This paper presents a Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) based alignment framework that achieves better overall performance.<n>We analyze experimental results obtained from testing DeepSeek-R1 on our benchmark and reveal the critical ethical concerns raised by this highly acclaimed model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-20T06:35:01Z) - Do Developers Adopt Green Architectural Tactics for ML-Enabled Systems? A Mining Software Repository Study [10.997873336451498]
Green AI advocates for reducing computational demands while still maintaining accuracy.<n>This paper addresses this gap by studying 168 open-source ML projects on GitHub.<n>It employs a novel large language model (LLM)-based mining mechanism to identify and analyze green strategies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-09T09:27:07Z) - Caution for the Environment: Multimodal Agents are Susceptible to Environmental Distractions [68.92637077909693]
This paper investigates the faithfulness of multimodal large language model (MLLM) agents in the graphical user interface (GUI) environment.
A general setting is proposed where both the user and the agent are benign, and the environment, while not malicious, contains unrelated content.
Experimental results reveal that even the most powerful models, whether generalist agents or specialist GUI agents, are susceptible to distractions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-05T15:16:22Z) - FinBen: A Holistic Financial Benchmark for Large Language Models [75.09474986283394]
FinBen is the first extensive open-source evaluation benchmark, including 36 datasets spanning 24 financial tasks.
FinBen offers several key innovations: a broader range of tasks and datasets, the first evaluation of stock trading, novel agent and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) evaluation, and three novel open-source evaluation datasets for text summarization, question answering, and stock trading.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-20T02:16:16Z) - GSVA: Generalized Segmentation via Multimodal Large Language Models [72.57095903188922]
Generalized Referring Expression (GRES) extends the scope of classic RES to refer to multiple objects in one expression or identify the empty targets absent in the image.
Current solutions to GRES remain unsatisfactory since segmentation MLLMs cannot correctly handle the cases where users might reference multiple subjects in a singular prompt.
We propose Generalized Vision Assistant (GSVA) to address this gap.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-15T02:54:31Z) - Leveraging Language Models to Detect Greenwashing [39.58317527488534]
We introduce a novel preliminary methodology to train a language model on generated labels for greenwashing risk.
Our best model achieved an average accuracy score of 86.34% and F1 score of 0.67, demonstrating that our proof-of-concept methodology shows a promising direction of exploration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T21:41:49Z) - Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Check [69.97942065617664]
This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in performing various sentiment analysis tasks.
We evaluate performance across 13 tasks on 26 datasets and compare the results against small language models (SLMs) trained on domain-specific datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T10:45:25Z) - Position: Tensor Networks are a Valuable Asset for Green AI [7.066223472133622]
This position paper introduces a fundamental link between tensor networks (TNs) and Green AI.
We argue that TNs are valuable for Green AI due to their strong mathematical backbone and inherent logarithmic compression potential.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-25T14:02:49Z) - Towards Green Automated Machine Learning: Status Quo and Future
Directions [71.86820260846369]
AutoML is being criticised for its high resource consumption.
This paper proposes Green AutoML, a paradigm to make the whole AutoML process more environmentally friendly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-10T18:57:27Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.