Emergence of psychopathological computations in large language models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.08016v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 15:36:30 GMT
• Title: Emergence of psychopathological computations in large language models
• Authors: Soo Yong Lee, Hyunjin Hwang, Taekwan Kim, Yuyeong Kim, Kyuri Park, Jaemin Yoo, Denny Borsboom, Kijung Shin,
• Abstract summary: We propose a computational-theoretical framework to provide an account of psychopathology applicable to large language models.<n>Our work alludes to the possibility of AI systems with psychopathological behaviors in the near future.
• Score: 22.78614613457714
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Can large language models (LLMs) implement computations of psychopathology? An effective approach to the question hinges on addressing two factors. First, for conceptual validity, we require a general and computational account of psychopathology that is applicable to computational entities without biological embodiment or subjective experience. Second, mechanisms underlying LLM behaviors need to be studied for better methodological validity. Thus, we establish a computational-theoretical framework to provide an account of psychopathology applicable to LLMs. To ground the theory for empirical analysis, we also propose a novel mechanistic interpretability method alongside a tailored empirical analytic framework. Based on the frameworks, we conduct experiments demonstrating three key claims: first, that distinct dysfunctional and problematic representational states are implemented in LLMs; second, that their activations can spread and self-sustain to trap LLMs; and third, that dynamic, cyclic structural causal models encoded in the LLMs underpin these patterns. In concert, the empirical results corroborate our hypothesis that network-theoretic computations of psychopathology have already emerged in LLMs. This suggests that certain LLM behaviors mirroring psychopathology may not be a superficial mimicry but a feature of their internal processing. Thus, our work alludes to the possibility of AI systems with psychopathological behaviors in the near future.

Related papers

• Comprehension Without Competence: Architectural Limits of LLMs in Symbolic Computation and Reasoning [7.996731257791417]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) display striking surface fluency yet systematically fail at tasks requiring symbolic reasoning, arithmetic accuracy, and logical consistency.<n>This paper offers a structural diagnosis of such failures, revealing a persistent gap between textitcomprehension and textitcompetence<n>We term this phenomenon the computational textitsplit-brain syndrome, where instruction and action pathways are geometrically and functionally dissociated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T04:01:45Z)
• LLMs model how humans induce logically structured rules [18.202446211409548]
  A long-standing debate concerns the adequacy of artificial neural networks as computational models.<n>Recent advances in neural networks -- specifically, the advent of large language models (LLMs) -- represent an important shift in this debate.<n>We argue that LLMs may instantiate a novel theoretical account of the primitive representations and computations necessary to explain human logical concepts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-05T03:24:18Z)
• Large Language Models as Psychological Simulators: A Methodological Guide [0.0]
  This article provides a framework for using large language models as psychological simulators across two primary applications.<n>For simulation, we present methods for developing psychologically grounded personas that move beyond demographic categories.<n>We address overarching challenges including prompt sensitivity, temporal limitations from training data cutoffs, and ethical considerations that extend beyond traditional human subjects review.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T02:45:23Z)
• Computational Thinking Reasoning in Large Language Models [69.28428524878885]
  Computational Thinking Model (CTM) is a novel framework that incorporates computational thinking paradigms into large language models (LLMs)<n>Live code execution is seamlessly integrated into the reasoning process, allowing CTM to think by computing.<n>CTM outperforms conventional reasoning models and tool-augmented baselines in terms of accuracy, interpretability, and generalizability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T09:11:15Z)
• Hypothesis-Driven Theory-of-Mind Reasoning for Large Language Models [76.6028674686018]
  We introduce thought-tracing, an inference-time reasoning algorithm to trace the mental states of agents.<n>Our algorithm is modeled after the Bayesian theory-of-mind framework.<n>We evaluate thought-tracing on diverse theory-of-mind benchmarks, demonstrating significant performance improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T15:08:50Z)
• LogiDynamics: Unraveling the Dynamics of Logical Inference in Large Language Model Reasoning [49.58786377307728]
  This paper adopts an exploratory approach by introducing a controlled evaluation environment for analogical reasoning.<n>We analyze the comparative dynamics of inductive, abductive, and deductive inference pipelines.<n>We investigate advanced paradigms such as hypothesis selection, verification, and refinement, revealing their potential to scale up logical inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T15:54:53Z)
• Logical forms complement probability in understanding language model (and human) performance [14.694876851134273]
  This work conducts a systematic investigation of large language models' ability to perform logical reasoning in natural language.<n>We introduce a controlled dataset of hypothetical and disjunctive syllogisms in propositional and modal logic.<n>We show similarities and discrepancies between the logical reasoning performances of humans and LLMs by collecting and comparing behavioral data from both.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T18:46:44Z)
• Neural DNF-MT: A Neuro-symbolic Approach for Learning Interpretable and Editable Policies [51.03989561425833]
  We propose a neuro-symbolic approach called neural DNF-MT for end-to-end policy learning. The differentiable nature of the neural DNF-MT model enables the use of deep actor-critic algorithms for training. We show how the bivalent representations of deterministic policies can be edited and incorporated back into a neural model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T15:51:49Z)
• Large Language Models as Neurolinguistic Subjects: Discrepancy in Performance and Competence for Form and Meaning [49.60849499134362]
  This study investigates the linguistic understanding of Large Language Models (LLMs) regarding signifier (form) and signified (meaning)<n>We introduce a neurolinguistic approach, utilizing a novel method that combines minimal pair and diagnostic probing to analyze activation patterns across model layers.<n>We found: (1) Psycholinguistic and neurolinguistic methods reveal that language performance and competence are distinct; (2) Direct probability measurement may not accurately assess linguistic competence; and (3) Instruction tuning won't change much competence but improve performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T04:16:44Z)
• Failure Modes of LLMs for Causal Reasoning on Narratives [51.19592551510628]
  We investigate the interaction between world knowledge and logical reasoning.<n>We find that state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) often rely on superficial generalizations.<n>We show that simple reformulations of the task can elicit more robust reasoning behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T12:48:58Z)
• Mind Scramble: Unveiling Large Language Model Psychology Via Typoglycemia [27.650551131885152]
  Research into large language models (LLMs) has shown promise in addressing complex tasks in the physical world. Studies suggest that powerful LLMs, like GPT-4, are beginning to exhibit human-like cognitive abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T15:47:25Z)
• Cognitive LLMs: Towards Integrating Cognitive Architectures and Large Language Models for Manufacturing Decision-making [51.737762570776006]
  LLM-ACTR is a novel neuro-symbolic architecture that provides human-aligned and versatile decision-making. Our framework extracts and embeds knowledge of ACT-R's internal decision-making process as latent neural representations. Our experiments on novel Design for Manufacturing tasks show both improved task performance as well as improved grounded decision-making capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T11:49:53Z)
• Does Reasoning Emerge? Examining the Probabilities of Causation in Large Language Models [6.922021128239465]
  Recent advances in AI have been driven by the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) This paper introduces a framework that is both theoretical and practical, aimed at assessing how effectively LLMs are able to replicate real-world reasoning mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T15:19:11Z)
• Categorical Syllogisms Revisited: A Review of the Logical Reasoning Abilities of LLMs for Analyzing Categorical Syllogism [62.571419297164645]
  This paper provides a systematic overview of prior works on the logical reasoning ability of large language models for analyzing categorical syllogisms.<n>We first investigate all the possible variations for the categorical syllogisms from a purely logical perspective.<n>We then examine the underlying configurations (i.e., mood and figure) tested by the existing datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-26T21:17:20Z)
• CausalGym: Benchmarking causal interpretability methods on linguistic tasks [52.61917615039112]
  We use CausalGym to benchmark the ability of interpretability methods to causally affect model behaviour. We study the pythia models (14M--6.9B) and assess the causal efficacy of a wide range of interpretability methods. We find that DAS outperforms the other methods, and so we use it to study the learning trajectory of two difficult linguistic phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T21:35:56Z)
• LLM-driven Imitation of Subrational Behavior : Illusion or Reality? [3.2365468114603937]
  Existing work highlights the ability of Large Language Models to address complex reasoning tasks and mimic human communication. We propose to investigate the use of LLMs to generate synthetic human demonstrations, which are then used to learn subrational agent policies. We experimentally evaluate the ability of our framework to model sub-rationality through four simple scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T19:46:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.