GRPO-LEAD: A Difficulty-Aware Reinforcement Learning Approach for Concise Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.09696v1
- Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2025 19:07:45 GMT
- Title: GRPO-LEAD: A Difficulty-Aware Reinforcement Learning Approach for Concise Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models
- Authors: Jixiao Zhang, Chunsheng Zuo,
- Abstract summary: GRPO-LEAD is a suite of novel enhancements tailored for mathematical reasoning.<n>It introduces (1) a length-dependent accuracy reward to encourage concise and precise solutions, (2) an explicit penalty mechanism for incorrect answers to sharpen decision boundaries, and (3) a difficulty-aware advantage reweighting strategy that amplifies learning signals for challenging problems.
- Score: 0.17265013728931003
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Recent advances in R1-like reasoning models leveraging Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) have significantly improved the performance of language models on mathematical reasoning tasks. However, current GRPO implementations encounter critical challenges, including reward sparsity due to binary accuracy metrics, limited incentives for conciseness, and insufficient focus on complex reasoning tasks. To address these issues, we propose GRPO-LEAD, a suite of novel enhancements tailored for mathematical reasoning. Specifically, GRPO-LEAD introduces (1) a length-dependent accuracy reward to encourage concise and precise solutions, (2) an explicit penalty mechanism for incorrect answers to sharpen decision boundaries, and (3) a difficulty-aware advantage reweighting strategy that amplifies learning signals for challenging problems. Furthermore, we systematically examine the impact of model scale and supervised fine-tuning (SFT) strategies, demonstrating that larger-scale base models and carefully curated datasets significantly enhance reinforcement learning effectiveness. Extensive empirical evaluations and ablation studies confirm that GRPO-LEAD substantially mitigates previous shortcomings, resulting in language models that produce more concise, accurate, and robust reasoning across diverse mathematical tasks.
Related papers
- LAPO: Internalizing Reasoning Efficiency via Length-Adaptive Policy Optimization [48.91511514636768]
We present Length-Adaptive Policy Optimization (LAPO), a framework that transforms reasoning length control from an external constraint into an intrinsic model capability.<n>LAPO enables models to internalize an understanding of appropriate reasoning depth through a two-stage reinforcement learning process.<n> Experiments on mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that LAPO reduces token usage by up to 40.9% while improving accuracy by 2.3%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-21T16:14:41Z) - Scaling Up RL: Unlocking Diverse Reasoning in LLMs via Prolonged Training [121.5858973157225]
We investigate the effects of prolonged reinforcement learning on a small language model across a diverse set of reasoning domains.<n>We introduce controlled KL regularization, clipping ratio, and periodic reference policy resets as critical components for unlocking long-term performance gains.<n>Our model achieves significant improvements over strong baselines, including +14.7% on math, +13.9% on coding, and +54.8% on logic puzzle tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-16T17:59:24Z) - KunLunBaizeRAG: Reinforcement Learning Driven Inference Performance Leap for Large Language Models [4.637288682081713]
KunLunBaizeRAG is a reinforcement learning-driven reasoning framework designed to enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in complex multi-hop question-answering tasks.<n>Key innovations include the RAG-driven Reasoning Alignment (RDRA) mechanism, the Search-Think Iterative Enhancement (STIE) mechanism, the Network-Local Intelligent Routing (NLR) mechanism, and a progressive hybrid training strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-24T09:48:01Z) - Beyond Accuracy: Dissecting Mathematical Reasoning for LLMs Under Reinforcement Learning [82.43575191712726]
We introduce a fine-grained analytic framework to dissect the impact ofReinforcement learning on reasoning.<n>Our framework specifically investigates key elements that have been hypothesized to benefit from RL training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-05T07:53:59Z) - DisCO: Reinforcing Large Reasoning Models with Discriminative Constrained Optimization [55.06360285372418]
Group Relative Policy Optimization is a reinforcement learning method for large reasoning models (LRMs)<n>In this work, we analyze the GRPO objective under a binary reward setting and reveal an inherent limitation of question-level difficulty bias.<n>We introduce a new Discriminative Constrained Optimization framework for reinforcing LRMs, grounded in the principle of discriminative learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-18T11:08:32Z) - Learning Like Humans: Advancing LLM Reasoning Capabilities via Adaptive Difficulty Curriculum Learning and Expert-Guided Self-Reformulation [5.793561443238794]
We propose two novel strategies to enhance the capability of large language models to solve complex problems.<n>First, Adaptive Difficulty Curriculum Learning (ADCL) is a novel curriculum learning strategy that tackles the Difficulty Shift phenomenon.<n>Second, Expert-Guided Self-Reformulation (EGSR) is a novel reinforcement learning strategy that bridges the gap between imitation learning and pure exploration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-13T09:10:48Z) - Training Large Language Models to Reason via EM Policy Gradient [0.27195102129094995]
We introduce an off-policy reinforcement learning algorithm, EM Policy Gradient, to enhance LLM reasoning.
We evaluate the effectiveness of EM Policy Gradient on the GSM8K and MATH (HARD) datasets.
Models fine-tuned with our method exhibit cognitive behaviors, such as sub-problem decomposition, self-verification, and backtracking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-24T01:31:05Z) - Improving Multilingual Retrieval-Augmented Language Models through Dialectic Reasoning Argumentations [65.11348389219887]
We introduce Dialectic-RAG (DRAG), a modular approach that evaluates retrieved information by comparing, contrasting, and resolving conflicting perspectives.<n>We show the impact of our framework both as an in-context learning strategy and for constructing demonstrations to instruct smaller models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-07T06:55:15Z) - Stop Overthinking: A Survey on Efficient Reasoning for Large Language Models [54.04678363287392]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex tasks.<n>Recent advancements in OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek-R1 have further improved performance in System-2 reasoning domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-20T17:59:38Z) - A Survey on Post-training of Large Language Models [185.51013463503946]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have fundamentally transformed natural language processing, making them indispensable across domains ranging from conversational systems to scientific exploration.<n>These challenges necessitate advanced post-training language models (PoLMs) to address shortcomings, such as restricted reasoning capacities, ethical uncertainties, and suboptimal domain-specific performance.<n>This paper presents the first comprehensive survey of PoLMs, systematically tracing their evolution across five core paradigms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-08T05:41:42Z) - SRA-MCTS: Self-driven Reasoning Augmentation with Monte Carlo Tree Search for Code Generation [14.786100203787194]
Large language models demonstrate exceptional performance in simple code generation tasks but face challenges in tackling complex problems.
We propose a reasoning-augmented data generation process, SRA-MCTS, which guides the model to autonomously generate high-quality intermediate reasoning paths.
Our method operates entirely through the model itself without requiring additional supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-17T12:31:04Z) - Optimal Query Allocation in Extractive QA with LLMs: A Learning-to-Defer Framework with Theoretical Guarantees [3.4289478404209826]
Large Language Models excel in generative tasks but exhibit inefficiencies in structured text selection.<n>We propose a Learning-to-Defer framework that allocates queries to specialized experts, ensuring high-confidence predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-21T08:21:00Z) - Enhancing Multi-Step Reasoning Abilities of Language Models through Direct Q-Function Optimization [49.362750475706235]
Reinforcement Learning (RL) plays a crucial role in aligning large language models with human preferences and improving their ability to perform complex tasks.<n>We introduce Direct Q-function Optimization (DQO), which formulates the response generation process as a Markov Decision Process (MDP) and utilizes the soft actor-critic (SAC) framework to optimize a Q-function directly parameterized by the language model.<n> Experimental results on two math problem-solving datasets, GSM8K and MATH, demonstrate that DQO outperforms previous methods, establishing it as a promising offline reinforcement learning approach for aligning language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-11T23:29:20Z) - The Role of Deductive and Inductive Reasoning in Large Language Models [37.430396755248104]
We propose the Deductive and InDuctive(DID) method to enhance Large Language Models (LLMs) reasoning.
DID implements a dual-metric complexity evaluation system that combines Littlestone dimension and information entropy.
Our results demonstrate significant improvements in reasoning quality and solution accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-03T18:30:47Z) - Can We Further Elicit Reasoning in LLMs? Critic-Guided Planning with Retrieval-Augmentation for Solving Challenging Tasks [68.49251303172674]
State-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive problem-solving capabilities but may struggle with complex reasoning and factual correctness.
Existing methods harness the strengths of chain-of-thought and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to decompose a complex problem into simpler steps and apply retrieval to improve factual correctness.
We introduce Critic-guided planning with Retrieval-augmentation, CR-Planner, a novel framework that leverages fine-tuned critic models to guide both reasoning and retrieval processes through planning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-02T11:26:02Z) - MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs [55.20845457594977]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making.
We present a process-based benchmark MR-Ben that demands a meta-reasoning skill.
Our meta-reasoning paradigm is especially suited for system-2 slow thinking.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T03:50:23Z) - Thinking Aloud: Dynamic Context Generation Improves Zero-Shot Reasoning
Performance of GPT-2 [6.037255578530709]
We show that dynamic problem elaboration significantly improves the zero-shot performance of GPT-2 in a deductive reasoning and natural language inference task.
In particular, elaborations that are most faithful to the original problem description may boost accuracy by up to 24%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-24T07:33:25Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.