Can Competition Enhance the Proficiency of Agents Powered by Large Language Models in the Realm of News-driven Time Series Forecasting?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.10210v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 13:25:50 GMT
• Title: Can Competition Enhance the Proficiency of Agents Powered by Large Language Models in the Realm of News-driven Time Series Forecasting?
• Authors: Yuxuan Zhang, Yangyang Feng, Daifeng Li, Kexin Zhang, Junlan Chen, Bowen Deng,
• Abstract summary: Multi-agents-based news-driven time series forecasting is considered as a potential paradigm shift in the era of large language models (LLMs)<n>This study embeds a competition mechanism within the multi-agent discussion to enhance agents' capability of generating innovative thoughts.<n>To bolster the model's proficiency in identifying misleading information, we incorporate a fine-tuned small-scale LLM model within the reflective stage.
• Score: 8.652262434505957
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multi-agents-based news-driven time series forecasting is considered as a potential paradigm shift in the era of large language models (LLMs). The challenge of this task lies in measuring the influences of different news events towards the fluctuations of time series. This requires agents to possess stronger abilities of innovative thinking and the identifying misleading logic. However, the existing multi-agent discussion framework has limited enhancement on time series prediction in terms of optimizing these two capabilities. Inspired by the role of competition in fostering innovation, this study embeds a competition mechanism within the multi-agent discussion to enhance agents' capability of generating innovative thoughts. Furthermore, to bolster the model's proficiency in identifying misleading information, we incorporate a fine-tuned small-scale LLM model within the reflective stage, offering auxiliary decision-making support. Experimental results confirm that the competition can boost agents' capacity for innovative thinking, which can significantly improve the performances of time series prediction. Similar to the findings of social science, the intensity of competition within this framework can influence the performances of agents, providing a new perspective for studying LLMs-based multi-agent systems.

Related papers

• Debate Only When Necessary: Adaptive Multiagent Collaboration for Efficient LLM Reasoning [8.800516398660069]
  Multiagent collaboration has emerged as a promising framework for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>We propose Debate Only When Necessary (DOWN), an adaptive multiagent debate framework that selectively activates the debate process based on the confidence score of the agent's initial response.<n>DOWN significantly improves efficiency while maintaining or even surpassing the performance of existing multiagent debate systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T13:17:52Z)
• Will Pre-Training Ever End? A First Step Toward Next-Generation Foundation MLLMs via Self-Improving Systematic Cognition [86.21199607040147]
  Self-Improving cognition (SIcog) is a self-learning framework for constructing next-generation foundation language models.<n>We introduce Chain-of-Description, a step-by-step visual understanding method, and integrate structured chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning to support in-depth multimodal reasoning.<n>Extensive experiments demonstrate that SIcog produces next-generation foundation MLLMs with substantially improved multimodal cognition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-16T00:25:13Z)
• ReMA: Learning to Meta-think for LLMs with Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [54.787341008881036]
  We introduce Reinforced Meta-thinking Agents (ReMA), a novel framework that leverages Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) to elicit meta-thinking behaviors.<n>ReMA decouples the reasoning process into two hierarchical agents: a high-level meta-thinking agent responsible for generating strategic oversight and plans, and a low-level reasoning agent for detailed executions.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that ReMA outperforms single-agent RL baselines on complex reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T16:05:31Z)
• Improving Retrospective Language Agents via Joint Policy Gradient Optimization [57.35348425288859]
  RetroAct is a framework that jointly optimize both task-planning and self-reflective evolution capabilities in language agents.<n>We develop a two-stage joint optimization process that integrates imitation learning and reinforcement learning.<n>We conduct extensive experiments across various testing environments, demonstrating RetroAct has substantial improvements in task performance and decision-making processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T12:54:54Z)
• Learning to Generate Research Idea with Dynamic Control [21.30777644522451]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in generating hypotheses and research ideas.<n>We introduce a novel framework that employs a two-stage approach combiningSupervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and controllable Reinforcement Learning (RL)<n>Our framework provides a balanced approach to research ideation, achieving high-quality outcomes by dynamically navigating the trade-offs among novelty, feasibility, and effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T08:28:18Z)
• BreakGPT: Leveraging Large Language Models for Predicting Asset Price Surges [55.2480439325792]
  This paper introduces BreakGPT, a novel large language model (LLM) architecture adapted specifically for time series forecasting and the prediction of sharp upward movements in asset prices. We showcase BreakGPT as a promising solution for financial forecasting with minimal training and as a strong competitor for capturing both local and global temporal dependencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T05:40:32Z)
• SMoA: Improving Multi-agent Large Language Models with Sparse Mixture-of-Agents [14.08299391695986]
  We propose a sparse mixture-of-agents (SMoA) framework to improve the efficiency and diversity of multi-agent LLMs. SMoA introduces novel Response Selection and Early Stopping mechanisms to sparsify information flows among individual LLM agents. Experiments on reasoning, alignment, and fairness benchmarks demonstrate that SMoA achieves performance comparable to traditional mixture-of-agents approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T17:33:39Z)
• Hypothetical Minds: Scaffolding Theory of Mind for Multi-Agent Tasks with Large Language Models [4.9108308035618515]
  Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) methods struggle with the non-stationarity of multi-agent systems.<n>Here, we leverage large language models (LLMs) to create an autonomous agent that can handle these challenges.<n>Our agent, Hypothetical Minds, consists of a cognitively-inspired architecture, featuring modular components for perception, memory, and hierarchical planning over two levels of abstraction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T17:57:15Z)
• Large Multimodal Agents: A Survey [78.81459893884737]
  Large language models (LLMs) have achieved superior performance in powering text-based AI agents. There is an emerging research trend focused on extending these LLM-powered AI agents into the multimodal domain. This review aims to provide valuable insights and guidelines for future research in this rapidly evolving field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T06:04:23Z)
• Reinforcement Learning through Active Inference [62.997667081978825]
  We show how ideas from active inference can augment traditional reinforcement learning approaches. We develop and implement a novel objective for decision making, which we term the free energy of the expected future. We demonstrate that the resulting algorithm successfully exploration and exploitation, simultaneously achieving robust performance on several challenging RL benchmarks with sparse, well-shaped, and no rewards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-28T10:28:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.