Using Generative AI Personas Increases Collective Diversity in Human Ideation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.13868v1
• Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 12:43:29 GMT
• Title: Using Generative AI Personas Increases Collective Diversity in Human Ideation
• Authors: Yun Wan, Yoram M Kalman,
• Abstract summary: This study challenges the widely-reported tradeoff between generative AI's (GenAI) contribution to creative outcomes and decreased diversity of these outcomes.<n>We modified the design of such a study, by Doshi and Hauser (2024), in which participants wrote short stories either aided or unaided by GenAI plot ideas.<n>Our findings demonstrate that introducing diversity at the AI input stage through distinct personas can preserve and potentially enhance the collective diversity of human creative outputs when collaborating with GenAI.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This study challenges the widely-reported tradeoff between generative AI's (GenAI) contribution to creative outcomes and decreased diversity of these outcomes. We modified the design of such a study, by Doshi and Hauser (2024), in which participants wrote short stories either aided or unaided by GenAI plot ideas[1]. In the modified study, plot ideas were generated through ten unique GenAI "personas" with diverse traits (e.g. cultural backgrounds, thinking styles, genre preferences), creating a pool of 300 story plots. While plot ideas from any individual persona showed high similarity (average cosine similarity of 0.92), ideas across different personas exhibited substantial variation (average similarity of 0.20). When human participants wrote stories based on these diverse plot ideas, their collective outputs maintained the same level of diversity as stories written without GenAI assistance, effectively eliminating the diversity reduction observed in [1]. Traditional text analytics further revealed that GenAI-assisted stories featured greater diversity in descriptive and emotional language compared to purely human-generated stories without GenAI assistance. Our findings demonstrate that introducing diversity at the AI input stage through distinct personas can preserve and potentially enhance the collective diversity of human creative outputs when collaborating with GenAI.

Related papers

• Creativity in the Age of AI: Evaluating the Impact of Generative AI on Design Outputs and Designers' Creative Thinking [19.713133349166778]
  We asked participants to design advertisements both with and without GenAI support. Expert evaluators rated GenAI-supported designs as more creative and unconventional "weird" Native English speakers experienced reduced relaxation when using AI, whereas designers new to GenAI exhibited gains in divergent thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T19:23:34Z)
• Hey GPT, Can You be More Racist? Analysis from Crowdsourced Attempts to Elicit Biased Content from Generative AI [41.96102438774773]
  This work presents the findings from a university-level competition, which challenged participants to design prompts for eliciting biased outputs from GenAI tools. We quantitatively and qualitatively analyze the competition submissions and identify a diverse set of biases in GenAI and strategies employed by participants to induce bias in GenAI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T18:44:45Z)
• Human Bias in the Face of AI: The Role of Human Judgement in AI Generated Text Evaluation [48.70176791365903]
  This study explores how bias shapes the perception of AI versus human generated content. We investigated how human raters respond to labeled and unlabeled content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T04:31:45Z)
• Measuring Human Contribution in AI-Assisted Content Generation [66.06040950325969]
  This study raises the research question of measuring human contribution in AI-assisted content generation.<n>By calculating mutual information between human input and AI-assisted output relative to self-information of AI-assisted output, we quantify the proportional information contribution of humans in content generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T05:56:04Z)
• The Factuality Tax of Diversity-Intervened Text-to-Image Generation: Benchmark and Fact-Augmented Intervention [61.80236015147771]
  We quantify the trade-off between using diversity interventions and preserving demographic factuality in T2I models. Experiments on DoFaiR reveal that diversity-oriented instructions increase the number of different gender and racial groups. We propose Fact-Augmented Intervention (FAI) to reflect on verbalized or retrieved factual information about gender and racial compositions of generation subjects in history.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-29T09:09:42Z)
• Generative AI for Visualization: State of the Art and Future Directions [7.273704442256712]
  This paper looks back on previous visualization studies leveraging GenAI. By summarizing different generation algorithms, their current applications and limitations, this paper endeavors to provide useful insights for future GenAI4VIS research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-28T11:27:30Z)
• Prompt Smells: An Omen for Undesirable Generative AI Outputs [4.105236597768038]
  We propose two new concepts that will aid the research community in addressing limitations associated with the application of GenAI models. First, we propose a definition for the "desirability" of GenAI outputs and three factors which are observed to influence it. Second, drawing inspiration from Martin Fowler's code smells, we propose the concept of "prompt smells" and the adverse effects they are observed to have on the desirability of GenAI outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T10:10:01Z)
• Generative artificial intelligence enhances creativity but reduces the diversity of novel content [0.0]
  Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) holds promise for humans to be more creative by offering new ideas, or less creative by anchoring on GenAI ideas. Access to GenAI ideas causes an increase in the writer's creativity with stories being evaluated as better written and more enjoyable. However, GenAI-enabled stories are more similar to each other than stories by humans alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T11:20:36Z)
• Affective and Dynamic Beam Search for Story Generation [50.3130767805383]
  We propose Affective Story Generator (AffGen) for generating interesting narratives. AffGen employs two novel techniques-Dynamic Beam Sizing and Affective Reranking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T16:37:14Z)
• How well can Text-to-Image Generative Models understand Ethical Natural Language Interventions? [67.97752431429865]
  We study the effect on the diversity of the generated images when adding ethical intervention. Preliminary studies indicate that a large change in the model predictions is triggered by certain phrases such as 'irrespective of gender'
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-27T07:32:39Z)
• MGD-GAN: Text-to-Pedestrian generation through Multi-Grained Discrimination [96.91091607251526]
  We propose the Multi-Grained Discrimination enhanced Generative Adversarial Network, that capitalizes a human-part-based Discriminator and a self-cross-attended Discriminator. A fine-grained word-level attention mechanism is employed in the HPD module to enforce diversified appearance and vivid details. The substantial improvement over the various metrics demonstrates the efficacy of MGD-GAN on the text-to-pedestrian synthesis scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-02T12:24:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.