Quantum pseudoresources imply cryptography

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15025v1
• Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 11:17:30 GMT
• Title: Quantum pseudoresources imply cryptography
• Authors: Alex B. Grilo, Álvaro Yángüez,
• Abstract summary: We study the cryptographic usefulness of quantum pseudoresources.<n>We show that quantum resources may play a similarly crucial role in the quantum setting.<n>We propose a new cryptographic functionality that is intrinsically dependent on entanglement as a resource.
• Score: 0.7366405857677227
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: While one-way functions (OWFs) serve as the minimal assumption for computational cryptography in the classical setting, in quantum cryptography, we have even weaker cryptographic assumptions such as pseudo-random states, and EFI pairs, among others. Moreover, the minimal assumption for computational quantum cryptography remains an open question. Recently, it has been shown that pseudoentanglement is necessary for the existence of quantum cryptography (Goul\~ao and Elkouss 2024), but no cryptographic construction has been built from it. In this work, we study the cryptographic usefulness of quantum pseudoresources -- a pair of families of quantum states that exhibit a gap in their resource content yet remain computationally indistinguishable. We show that quantum pseudoresources imply a variant of EFI pairs, which we call EPFI pairs, and that these are equivalent to quantum commitments and thus EFI pairs. Our results suggest that, just as randomness is fundamental to classical cryptography, quantum resources may play a similarly crucial role in the quantum setting. Finally, we focus on the specific case of entanglement, analyzing different definitions of pseudoentanglement and their implications for constructing EPFI pairs. Moreover, we propose a new cryptographic functionality that is intrinsically dependent on entanglement as a resource.

Related papers

• Pseudorandom quantum authentication [0.8204952610951527]
  We introduce the pseudorandom quantum authentication scheme (PQAS)<n>It is an efficient method for quantum states that relies solely on the existence of pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-01T20:46:37Z)
• Revocable Encryption, Programs, and More: The Case of Multi-Copy Security [48.53070281993869]
  We show the feasibility of revocable primitives, such as revocable encryption and revocable programs.<n>This suggests that the stronger notion of multi-copy security is within reach in unclonable cryptography.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T02:37:40Z)
• Hard Quantum Extrapolations in Quantum Cryptography [9.214658764451348]
  We study the quantum analogues of the universal extrapolation task. We show that it is hard if quantum commitments exist, and it is easy for quantum space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T00:09:42Z)
• Pseudo-Entanglement is Necessary for EFI Pairs [0.0]
  We consider a new quantum resource, pseudo-entanglement, and show that the existence of EFI pairs implies the existence of pseudo-entanglement. Our result has important implications for the field of computational cryptography.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T01:44:16Z)
• Existential Unforgeability in Quantum Authentication From Quantum Physical Unclonable Functions Based on Random von Neumann Measurement [45.386403865847235]
  Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) leverage inherent, non-clonable physical randomness to generate unique input-output pairs.<n>Quantum PUFs (QPUFs) extend this concept by using quantum states as input-output pairs.<n>We show that random unitary QPUFs cannot achieve existential unforgeability against Quantum Polynomial Time adversaries.<n>We introduce a second model where the QPUF functions as a nonunitary quantum channel, which guarantees existential unforgeability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T12:16:41Z)
• Commitments from Quantum One-Wayness [0.0]
  This work studies one-way state generators, a natural quantum relaxation of one-way functions. A fundamental question is whether this type of quantum one-wayness suffices to realize quantum cryptography. We prove that one-way state generators with pure state outputs imply quantum bit commitments and secure multiparty computation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T18:48:22Z)
• Revocable Cryptography from Learning with Errors [61.470151825577034]
  We build on the no-cloning principle of quantum mechanics and design cryptographic schemes with key-revocation capabilities. We consider schemes where secret keys are represented as quantum states with the guarantee that, once the secret key is successfully revoked from a user, they no longer have the ability to perform the same functionality as before.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-28T18:58:11Z)
• One-Wayness in Quantum Cryptography [9.09597656634436]
  We study properties of one-way state generators (OWSGs), which are a quantum analogue of one-way functions. We show that Quantum digital signatures are equivalent to OWSGs. We introduce an variant of OWSGs, which we call secretly-verifiable and statistically-invertible OWSGs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-07T08:21:21Z)
• A Variational Quantum Attack for AES-like Symmetric Cryptography [69.80357450216633]
  We propose a variational quantum attack algorithm (VQAA) for classical AES-like symmetric cryptography. In the VQAA, the known ciphertext is encoded as the ground state of a Hamiltonian that is constructed through a regular graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-07T03:15:15Z)
• Interactive Protocols for Classically-Verifiable Quantum Advantage [46.093185827838035]
  "Interactions" between a prover and a verifier can bridge the gap between verifiability and implementation. We demonstrate the first implementation of an interactive quantum advantage protocol, using an ion trap quantum computer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-09T19:00:00Z)
• Depth-efficient proofs of quantumness [77.34726150561087]
  A proof of quantumness is a type of challenge-response protocol in which a classical verifier can efficiently certify quantum advantage of an untrusted prover. In this paper, we give two proof of quantumness constructions in which the prover need only perform constant-depth quantum circuits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T17:45:41Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.