"Ohhh, He's the Boss!": Unpacking Power Dynamics Among Developers, Designers, and End-Users in FLOSS Usability

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15494v1
• Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 23:52:03 GMT
• Title: "Ohhh, He's the Boss!": Unpacking Power Dynamics Among Developers, Designers, and End-Users in FLOSS Usability
• Authors: Jazlyn Hellman, Itai Epstein, Jinghui Cheng, Jin L. C. Guo,
• Abstract summary: We explore how power of different FLOSS stakeholders manifests and can be mediated during collaboration.<n>We conducted eight design workshops with different combinations of key FLOSS stakeholders.<n>Our results contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the power dynamics among FLOSS stakeholders.
• Score: 15.427821536893108
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Addressing usability in free, libre, and open-source software (FLOSS) is a challenging issue, particularly due to a long-existing "by developer, for developer" mentality. Engaging designers and end-users to work with developers can help improve its usability, but unequal power dynamics among those stakeholder roles must be mitigated. To explore how the power of different FLOSS stakeholders manifests and can be mediated during collaboration, we conducted eight design workshops with different combinations of key FLOSS stakeholders (i.e., developers, designers, and end-users). Leveraging existing theories on Dimensions of Power, we revealed how participants navigate existing role-based power structures through resource utilization, knowledge gap management, and experience referencing. We also observed that participants exhibited diverse behaviors confirming and challenging the status quo of FLOSS usability. Overall, our results contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the power dynamics among FLOSS stakeholders, providing valuable insights into ways to balance their power to improve FLOSS usability. Our work also serves as an exemplar of using design workshops as a research method to study power dynamics during collaboration that are usually hidden in the field.

Related papers

• Intent Tagging: Exploring Micro-Prompting Interactions for Supporting Granular Human-GenAI Co-Creation Workflows [28.404085240725717]
  Core challenges include misalignment of AI-generated content with user intentions (intent elicitation and alignment), user uncertainty around how to best communicate their intents to an AI system, and insufficient flexibility of AI systems to support diverse creative (workflow flexibility) Motivated by these challenges, we created IntentTagger: a system for slide creation based on the notion of Intent Tags. Our user study with 12 participants provides insights into the value of flexibly expressing intent across varying levels of ambiguity, meta-intent elicitation, and the benefits and challenges of intent tag-driven intent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T01:13:47Z)
• Untold Stories: Unveiling the Scarce Contributions of UX Professionals to Usability Issue Discussions of Open Source Software Projects [11.767394881100223]
  This study identifies UX professionals' distinct approaches to raising and following up on usability issues.<n>Compared to other contributors, UX professionals addressed a broader range of usability issues, well-supported their stances, and were more factual than emotional.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T15:45:13Z)
• OSSDoorway: A Gamified Environment to Scaffold Student Contributions to Open Source Software [15.46529088040852]
  This paper proposes and evaluates OSSDoorway, a tool designed to guide students contributing to open source software (OSS) projects.<n>We recruited 29 students and administered a self-efficacy questionnaire before and after their use of OSSDoorway.<n>Results show that OSSDoorway boosts students' self-efficacy and provides a structured, gamified learning experience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T22:07:27Z)
• Green My LLM: Studying the key factors affecting the energy consumption of code assistants [1.747820331822631]
  This paper investigates the energy consumption of large language models-based code assistants such as GitHub Copilot. Our findings reveal that the energy consumption and performance of code assistants are influenced by various factors, such as the number of concurrent developers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T16:00:29Z)
• TeamLoRA: Boosting Low-Rank Adaptation with Expert Collaboration and Competition [61.91764883512776]
  We introduce an innovative PEFT method, TeamLoRA, consisting of a collaboration and competition module for experts. By doing so, TeamLoRA connects the experts as a "Team" with internal collaboration and competition, enabling a faster and more accurate PEFT paradigm for multi-task learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T09:58:53Z)
• FactorLLM: Factorizing Knowledge via Mixture of Experts for Large Language Models [50.331708897857574]
  We introduce FactorLLM, a novel approach that decomposes well-trained dense FFNs into sparse sub-networks without requiring any further modifications. FactorLLM achieves comparable performance to the source model securing up to 85% model performance while obtaining over a 30% increase in inference speed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T16:45:16Z)
• Learning Iterative Reasoning through Energy Diffusion [90.24765095498392]
  We introduce iterative reasoning through energy diffusion (IRED), a novel framework for learning to reason for a variety of tasks. IRED learns energy functions to represent the constraints between input conditions and desired outputs. We show IRED outperforms existing methods in continuous-space reasoning, discrete-space reasoning, and planning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T03:36:47Z)
• WorkArena: How Capable Are Web Agents at Solving Common Knowledge Work Tasks? [83.19032025950986]
  We study the use of large language model-based agents for interacting with software via web browsers. WorkArena is a benchmark of 33 tasks based on the widely-used ServiceNow platform. BrowserGym is an environment for the design and evaluation of such agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T14:58:45Z)
• Harder Tasks Need More Experts: Dynamic Routing in MoE Models [58.18526590138739]
  We introduce a novel dynamic expert selection framework for Mixture of Experts (MoE) models. Our method dynamically selects experts based on the confidence level in expert selection for each input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T13:41:15Z)
• LoRAMoE: Alleviate World Knowledge Forgetting in Large Language Models via MoE-Style Plugin [85.16356890023582]
  We propose LoRAMoE, a novelty framework that introduces several low-rank adapters (LoRA) and integrates them by using a router network. It freezes the backbone model and forces a portion of LoRAs to focus on leveraging world knowledge to solve downstream tasks. Experimental results show that, as the instruction data increases, LoRAMoE can significantly improve the ability to process downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T17:45:06Z)
• Characterizing Usability Issue Discussions in Open Source Software Projects [13.901618206448049]
  Usability is one of the most neglected concerns in open source software (OSS) There is little knowledge about the extent to which OSS community members engage in usability issue discussions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-19T01:47:08Z)
• Unleashing the Emergent Cognitive Synergy in Large Language Models: A Task-Solving Agent through Multi-Persona Self-Collaboration [116.09561564489799]
  Solo Performance Prompting transforms a single LLM into a cognitive synergist by engaging in multi-turn self-collaboration with multiple personas. A cognitive synergist is an intelligent agent that collaboratively combines multiple minds' strengths and knowledge to enhance problem-solving in complex tasks. Our in-depth analysis shows that assigning multiple fine-grained personas in LLMs improves problem-solving abilities compared to using a single or fixed number of personas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T14:45:19Z)
• Factorizing Knowledge in Neural Networks [65.57381498391202]
  We propose a novel knowledge-transfer task, Knowledge Factorization(KF) KF aims to decompose it into several factor networks, each of which handles only a dedicated task and maintains task-specific knowledge factorized from the source network. We introduce an information-theoretic objective, InfoMax-Bottleneck(IMB), to carry out KF by optimizing the mutual information between the learned representations and input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T09:56:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.