Quantifying quantum-state texture
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.18166v1
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 08:29:16 GMT
- Title: Quantifying quantum-state texture
- Authors: Yiding Wang, Hui Liu, Tinggui Zhang,
- Abstract summary: We introduce several potential quantum-state texture measure schemes.<n>We check whether they satisfy the three fundamental conditions required for a valid quantum-state texture measure.
- Score: 3.5732883784191865
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Quantum-state texture is a newly recognized quantum resource that has garnered attention with the advancement of quantum theory. In this work, we introduce several potential quantum-state texture measure schemes and check whether they satisfy the three fundamental conditions required for a valid quantum-state texture measure. Specifically, the measure induced by the l_1-norm serves as a vital tool for quantifying coherence, but we prove that it cannot be used to quantify quantum state texture. Furthermore, we show that while relative entropy and robustness meet three fundamental conditions, they are not optimal for quantifying quantum-state texture. Fortunately, we still find that there are several measures that can be used as the measure standard of quantum-state texture. Among them, the trace distance measure and the geometric measure are two good measurement schemes. In addition, the two measures based on Uhlmann's fidelity are experimentally friendly and can serve as an ideal definition of quantum-state texture measures in non-equilibrium situations. All these researches on quantum-state texture measure theory can enrich the resource theory framework of quantum-state texture.
Related papers
- Characterizing quantum state-space with a single quantum measurement [0.0]
We show that quantum theory can be derived from studying the behavior of a single "reference" measuring device.<n>In this privileged case, each quantum state correspond to a probability-distribution over the outcomes of a single measurement.<n>We show how 3-designs allow the structure-coefficients of the Jordan algebra of observables to be extracted from the probabilities which characterize the reference measurement.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-18T05:00:45Z) - Entanglement measurement based on convex hull properties [0.0]
We will propose a scheme for measuring quantum entanglement, which starts with treating the set of quantum separable states as a convex hull of quantum separable pure states.
Although a large amount of data is required in the measurement process, this method is not only applicable to 2-qubit quantum states, but also a entanglement measurement method that can be applied to any dimension and any fragment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-08T08:03:35Z) - A universal scheme to self-test any quantum state and extremal measurement [41.94295877935867]
quantum network considered in this work is the simple star network, which is implementable using current technologies.
For our purposes, we also construct a scheme that can be used to self-test the two-dimensional tomographically complete set of measurements with an arbitrary number of parties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-07T16:20:28Z) - How quantum mechanics requires non-additive measures [0.0]
Measure theory is used in physics, not just to capture classical probability, but also to quantify the number of states.
We construct the quantum equivalent of the Liouville measure, which is non-additive and has a unitary lower bound.
We show these preliminary results and outline a new line of inquiry that may provide a different insight into the foundations of quantum theory.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-03T14:46:55Z) - Enhanced Entanglement in the Measurement-Altered Quantum Ising Chain [43.80709028066351]
Local quantum measurements do not simply disentangle degrees of freedom, but may actually strengthen the entanglement in the system.<n>This paper explores how a finite density of local measurement modifies a given state's entanglement structure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-04T09:51:00Z) - Quantification of Entanglement and Coherence with Purity Detection [16.01598003770752]
Entanglement and coherence are fundamental properties of quantum systems, promising to power near future quantum technologies.
Here, we demonstrate quantitative bounds to operationally useful entanglement and coherence.
Our research offers an efficient means of verifying large-scale quantum information processing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-14T11:03:40Z) - Quantum data learning for quantum simulations in high-energy physics [55.41644538483948]
We explore the applicability of quantum-data learning to practical problems in high-energy physics.
We make use of ansatz based on quantum convolutional neural networks and numerically show that it is capable of recognizing quantum phases of ground states.
The observation of non-trivial learning properties demonstrated in these benchmarks will motivate further exploration of the quantum-data learning architecture in high-energy physics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-29T18:00:01Z) - Quantum State Tomography for Matrix Product Density Operators [28.799576051288888]
Reconstruction of quantum states from experimental measurements is crucial for the verification and benchmarking of quantum devices.
Many physical quantum states, such as states generated by noisy, intermediate-scale quantum computers, are usually structured.
We establish theoretical guarantees for the stable recovery of MPOs using tools from compressive sensing and the theory of empirical processes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-15T18:23:55Z) - Improved Quantum Algorithms for Fidelity Estimation [77.34726150561087]
We develop new and efficient quantum algorithms for fidelity estimation with provable performance guarantees.
Our algorithms use advanced quantum linear algebra techniques, such as the quantum singular value transformation.
We prove that fidelity estimation to any non-trivial constant additive accuracy is hard in general.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-30T02:02:16Z) - Experimental investigation of quantum uncertainty relations with
classical shadows [7.675613458661457]
We experimentally investigate quantum uncertainty relations construed with relative entropy of coherence.
We prepare a family of quantum states whose purity can be fully controlled.
Our results indicate the tightness of quantum coherence lower bounds dependents on the reference bases as well as the purity of quantum state.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-14T00:26:31Z) - Efficient criteria of quantumness for a large system of qubits [58.720142291102135]
We discuss the dimensionless combinations of basic parameters of large, partially quantum coherent systems.
Based on analytical and numerical calculations, we suggest one such number for a system of qubits undergoing adiabatic evolution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-30T23:50:05Z) - On exploring the potential of quantum auto-encoder for learning quantum systems [60.909817434753315]
We devise three effective QAE-based learning protocols to address three classically computational hard learning problems.
Our work sheds new light on developing advanced quantum learning algorithms to accomplish hard quantum physics and quantum information processing tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-29T14:01:40Z) - Characterizing quantum ensemble using geometric measure of quantum
coherence [1.5630592429258865]
We propose a quantumness quantifier for the quantum ensemble.
It satisfies the necessary axioms of a bonafide measure of quantumness.
We compute the quantumness of a few well-known ensembles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-19T07:37:27Z) - Direct estimation of quantum coherence by collective measurements [54.97898890263183]
We introduce a collective measurement scheme for estimating the amount of coherence in quantum states.
Our scheme outperforms other estimation methods based on tomography or adaptive measurements.
We show that our method is accessible with today's technology by implementing it experimentally with photons.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-06T03:50:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.