ResearchCodeAgent: An LLM Multi-Agent System for Automated Codification of Research Methodologies
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.20117v1
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 07:18:45 GMT
- Title: ResearchCodeAgent: An LLM Multi-Agent System for Automated Codification of Research Methodologies
- Authors: Shubham Gandhi, Dhruv Shah, Manasi Patwardhan, Lovekesh Vig, Gautam Shroff,
- Abstract summary: We introduce ResearchCodeAgent, a novel multi-agent system to automate the codification of research methodologies.<n>The system bridges the gap between high-level research concepts and their practical implementation.<n>ResearchCodeAgent represents a significant step towards the research implementation process, potentially accelerating the pace of machine learning research.
- Score: 16.90884865239373
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: In this paper we introduce ResearchCodeAgent, a novel multi-agent system leveraging large language models (LLMs) agents to automate the codification of research methodologies described in machine learning literature. The system bridges the gap between high-level research concepts and their practical implementation, allowing researchers auto-generating code of existing research papers for benchmarking or building on top-of existing methods specified in the literature with availability of partial or complete starter code. ResearchCodeAgent employs a flexible agent architecture with a comprehensive action suite, enabling context-aware interactions with the research environment. The system incorporates a dynamic planning mechanism, utilizing both short and long-term memory to adapt its approach iteratively. We evaluate ResearchCodeAgent on three distinct machine learning tasks with distinct task complexity and representing different parts of the ML pipeline: data augmentation, optimization, and data batching. Our results demonstrate the system's effectiveness and generalizability, with 46.9% of generated code being high-quality and error-free, and 25% showing performance improvements over baseline implementations. Empirical analysis shows an average reduction of 57.9% in coding time compared to manual implementation. We observe higher gains for more complex tasks. ResearchCodeAgent represents a significant step towards automating the research implementation process, potentially accelerating the pace of machine learning research.
Related papers
- A Vision for Auto Research with LLM Agents [47.310516109726656]
This paper introduces Agent-Based Auto Research, a structured multi-agent framework designed to automate, coordinate, and optimize the full lifecycle of scientific research.
The system spans all major research phases, including literature review, ideation, methodology, experimentation, paper writing, peer review response, and dissemination.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-26T02:06:10Z) - Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges [88.3032929492409]
Large Language Model (LLM) agents, with goal-driven behaviors and dynamic adaptation capabilities, potentially represent a critical pathway toward artificial general intelligence.<n>This survey systematically deconstructs LLM agent systems through a methodology-centered taxonomy.<n>Our work provides a unified architectural perspective, examining how agents are constructed, how they collaborate, and how they evolve over time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-27T12:50:17Z) - MLGym: A New Framework and Benchmark for Advancing AI Research Agents [51.9387884953294]
We introduce Meta MLGym and MLGym-Bench, a new framework and benchmark for evaluating and developing large language models on AI research tasks.<n>This is the first Gym environment for machine learning (ML) tasks, enabling research on reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms for training such agents.<n>We evaluate a number of frontier large language models (LLMs) on our benchmarks such as Claude-3.5-Sonnet, Llama-3.1 405B, GPT-4o, o1-preview, and Gemini-1.5 Pro.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-20T12:28:23Z) - Multi-Agent Sampling: Scaling Inference Compute for Data Synthesis with Tree Search-Based Agentic Collaboration [81.45763823762682]
This work aims to bridge the gap by investigating the problem of data synthesis through multi-agent sampling.
We introduce Tree Search-based Orchestrated Agents(TOA), where the workflow evolves iteratively during the sequential sampling process.
Our experiments on alignment, machine translation, and mathematical reasoning demonstrate that multi-agent sampling significantly outperforms single-agent sampling as inference compute scales.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-22T15:16:44Z) - Exploring Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Unrelated Parallel Machine Scheduling [2.3034630097498883]
The study introduces the Reinforcement Learning environment and conducts empirical analyses.
The experiments employ various deep neural network policies for single- and Multi-Agent approaches.
While Single-Agent algorithms perform adequately in reduced scenarios, Multi-Agent approaches reveal challenges in cooperative learning but a scalable capacity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-12T08:27:27Z) - Learning to Rank for Multiple Retrieval-Augmented Models through Iterative Utility Maximization [21.115495457454365]
This paper investigates the design of a unified search engine to serve multiple retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) agents.
We introduce an iterative approach where the search engine generates retrieval results for these RAG agents and gathers feedback on the quality of the retrieved documents during an offline phase.
We adapt this approach to an online setting, allowing the search engine to refine its behavior based on real-time individual agents feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-13T17:53:50Z) - AutoML-Agent: A Multi-Agent LLM Framework for Full-Pipeline AutoML [56.565200973244146]
Automated machine learning (AutoML) accelerates AI development by automating tasks in the development pipeline.
Recent works have started exploiting large language models (LLM) to lessen such burden.
This paper proposes AutoML-Agent, a novel multi-agent framework tailored for full-pipeline AutoML.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-03T20:01:09Z) - ComfyBench: Benchmarking LLM-based Agents in ComfyUI for Autonomously Designing Collaborative AI Systems [80.69865295743149]
This work attempts to study using LLM-based agents to design collaborative AI systems autonomously.<n>Based on ComfyBench, we develop ComfyAgent, a framework that empowers agents to autonomously design collaborative AI systems by generating.<n>While ComfyAgent achieves a comparable resolve rate to o1-preview and significantly surpasses other agents on ComfyBench, ComfyAgent has resolved only 15% of creative tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-02T17:44:10Z) - Optimizing Collaboration of LLM based Agents for Finite Element Analysis [1.5039745292757671]
This paper investigates the interactions between multiple agents within Large Language Models (LLMs) in the context of programming and coding tasks.
We utilize the AutoGen framework to facilitate communication among agents, evaluating different configurations based on the success rates from 40 random runs for each setup.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-23T23:11:08Z) - System for systematic literature review using multiple AI agents:
Concept and an empirical evaluation [5.194208843843004]
We introduce a novel multi-AI agent model designed to fully automate the process of conducting Systematic Literature Reviews.
The model operates through a user-friendly interface where researchers input their topic.
It generates a search string used to retrieve relevant academic papers.
The model then autonomously summarizes the abstracts of these papers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-13T10:27:52Z) - MatPlotAgent: Method and Evaluation for LLM-Based Agentic Scientific Data Visualization [86.61052121715689]
MatPlotAgent is a model-agnostic framework designed to automate scientific data visualization tasks.
MatPlotBench is a high-quality benchmark consisting of 100 human-verified test cases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-18T04:28:28Z) - MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentation [96.71370747681078]
We introduce MLAgentBench, a suite of 13 tasks ranging from improving model performance on CIFAR-10 to recent research problems like BabyLM.
For each task, an agent can perform actions like reading/writing files, executing code, and inspecting outputs.
We benchmark agents based on Claude v1.0, Claude v2.1, Claude v3 Opus, GPT-4, GPT-4-turbo, Gemini-Pro, and Mixtral and find that a Claude v3 Opus agent is the best in terms of success rate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-05T04:06:12Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.