Fine-Tuning LLMs for Low-Resource Dialect Translation: The Case of Lebanese

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00114v1
• Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2025 18:33:53 GMT
• Title: Fine-Tuning LLMs for Low-Resource Dialect Translation: The Case of Lebanese
• Abstract summary: This paper examines the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in translating the low-resource Lebanese dialect.<n>We compare three fine-tuning approaches: Basic, contrastive, and grammar-hint tuning, using open-source Aya23 models.<n>Experiments reveal that models fine-tuned on a smaller but culturally aware Lebanese dataset consistently outperform those trained on larger, non-native data.
• Score: 2.8161155726745237
• License: http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper examines the effectiveness of Large Language Models (LLMs) in translating the low-resource Lebanese dialect, focusing on the impact of culturally authentic data versus larger translated datasets. We compare three fine-tuning approaches: Basic, contrastive, and grammar-hint tuning, using open-source Aya23 models. Experiments reveal that models fine-tuned on a smaller but culturally aware Lebanese dataset (LW) consistently outperform those trained on larger, non-native data. The best results were achieved through contrastive fine-tuning paired with contrastive prompting, which indicates the benefits of exposing translation models to bad examples. In addition, to ensure authentic evaluation, we introduce LebEval, a new benchmark derived from native Lebanese content, and compare it to the existing FLoRes benchmark. Our findings challenge the "More Data is Better" paradigm and emphasize the crucial role of cultural authenticity in dialectal translation. We made our datasets and code available on Github.

Related papers

• Ready to Translate, Not to Represent? Bias and Performance Gaps in Multilingual LLMs Across Language Families and Domains [6.357124887141297]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have redefined Machine Translation (MT)<n>LLMs often exhibit uneven performance across language families and specialized domains.<n>We introduce Translation Tangles, a unified framework and dataset for evaluating the translation quality and fairness of open-source LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T07:28:30Z)
• Data Augmentation With Back translation for Low Resource languages: A case of English and Luganda [0.0]
  We explore the application of Back translation as a semi-supervised technique to enhance Neural Machine Translation models for the English-Luganda language pair.<n>Our methodology involves developing custom NMT models using both publicly available and web-crawled data, and applying Iterative and Incremental Back translation techniques.<n>The results of our study show significant improvements, with translation performance for the English-Luganda pair exceeding previous benchmarks by more than 10 BLEU score units across all translation directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-05T08:47:52Z)
• Synthetic Data Generation for Culturally Nuanced Commonsense Reasoning in Low-Resource Languages [5.376127198656944]
  We compare three dataset creation strategies: (1) LLM-assisted dataset generation, (2) machine translation, and (3) human-written data by native speakers, to build a culturally nuanced story comprehension dataset.<n>Our findings indicate that LLM-assisted data creation outperforms machine translation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T15:14:58Z)
• Rephrasing natural text data with different languages and quality levels for Large Language Model pre-training [12.29061850090405]
  We build upon previous work by replicating existing results on C4 and extending them with our optimized rephrasing pipeline. Our pipeline leads to increased performance on standard evaluation benchmarks in both the mono- and multilingual setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T07:30:05Z)
• LLM-based Translation Inference with Iterative Bilingual Understanding [52.46978502902928]
  We propose a novel Iterative Bilingual Understanding Translation method based on the cross-lingual capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>The cross-lingual capability of LLMs enables the generation of contextual understanding for both the source and target languages separately.<n>The proposed IBUT outperforms several strong comparison methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T13:21:46Z)
• Strategies for Improving NL-to-FOL Translation with LLMs: Data Generation, Incremental Fine-Tuning, and Verification [9.36179617282876]
  We create a high-quality FOL-annotated subset of ProofWriter dataset using GPT-4o. Our results show state-of-the-art performance for ProofWriter and ProntoQA datasets using ProofFOL on LLaMA-2 and Mistral models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-24T21:24:07Z)
• How Much Data is Enough Data? Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for In-House Translation: Performance Evaluation Across Multiple Dataset Sizes [2.0109318570325847]
  We investigate the impact of fine-tuning the Llama 3 model using TMs from a specific organisation in the software sector. We fine-tune separate models for each training set and evaluate their performance based on automatic metrics, BLEU, chrF++, TER, and COMET. Our findings reveal improvement in translation performance with larger datasets across all metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-05T12:06:38Z)
• A Preference-driven Paradigm for Enhanced Translation with Large Language Models [33.51585908894444]
  Large language models (LLMs) can achieve remarkable translation performance using only a small amount of parallel data. SFT simply instructs the model to imitate the reference translations at the token level, making it vulnerable to the noise present in the references. We propose a preference-based approach built upon the Plackett-Luce model to overcome this plateau.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T11:52:47Z)
• Extrapolating Large Language Models to Non-English by Aligning Languages [109.09051737966178]
  Existing large language models show disparate capability across different languages. In this paper, we empower pre-trained LLMs on non-English languages by building semantic alignment across languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-09T13:32:06Z)
• Improving Domain-Specific Retrieval by NLI Fine-Tuning [64.79760042717822]
  This article investigates the fine-tuning potential of natural language inference (NLI) data to improve information retrieval and ranking. We employ both monolingual and multilingual sentence encoders fine-tuned by a supervised method utilizing contrastive loss and NLI data. Our results point to the fact that NLI fine-tuning increases the performance of the models in both tasks and both languages, with the potential to improve mono- and multilingual models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-06T12:40:58Z)
• Training Language Models with Language Feedback at Scale [50.70091340506957]
  We introduce learning from Language Feedback (ILF), a new approach that utilizes more informative language feedback. ILF consists of three steps that are applied iteratively: first, conditioning the language model on the input, an initial LM output, and feedback to generate refinements. We show theoretically that ILF can be viewed as Bayesian Inference, similar to Reinforcement Learning from human feedback.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T17:04:15Z)
• Ensemble Transfer Learning for Multilingual Coreference Resolution [60.409789753164944]
  A problem that frequently occurs when working with a non-English language is the scarcity of annotated training data. We design a simple but effective ensemble-based framework that combines various transfer learning techniques. We also propose a low-cost TL method that bootstraps coreference resolution models by utilizing Wikipedia anchor texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-22T18:22:55Z)
• Distributionally Robust Multilingual Machine Translation [94.51866646879337]
  We propose a new learning objective for Multilingual neural machine translation (MNMT) based on distributionally robust optimization. We show how to practically optimize this objective for large translation corpora using an iterated best response scheme. Our method consistently outperforms strong baseline methods in terms of average and per-language performance under both many-to-one and one-to-many translation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-09T03:48:35Z)
• On the Language Coverage Bias for Neural Machine Translation [81.81456880770762]
  Language coverage bias is important for neural machine translation (NMT) because the target-original training data is not well exploited in current practice. By carefully designing experiments, we provide comprehensive analyses of the language coverage bias in the training data. We propose two simple and effective approaches to alleviate the language coverage bias problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T01:55:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.