UK Finfluencers: Exploring Content, Reach, and Responsibility

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.01941v2
• Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 08:34:17 GMT
• Title: UK Finfluencers: Exploring Content, Reach, and Responsibility
• Authors: Essam Ghadafi, Panagiotis Andriotis,
• Abstract summary: This study investigates the patterns and behaviours of finfluencers in the UK on TikTok.<n>The aim is to identify common engagement patterns and propose guidelines that can help protect the public from potential financial harm.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The rise of social media financial influencers (finfluencers) has significantly transformed the personal finance landscape, making financial advice and insights more accessible to a broader and younger audience. By leveraging digital platforms, these influencers have contributed to the democratization of financial literacy. However, the line between education and promotion is often blurred, as many finfluencers lack formal financial qualifications, raising concerns about the accuracy and reliability of the information they share. This study investigates the patterns and behaviours of finfluencers in the UK on TikTok, focusing not on individual actions but on broader trends and the interactions between influencers and their followers. The aim is to identify common engagement patterns and propose guidelines that can help protect the public from potential financial harm. Specifically, the paper contributes a detailed analysis of finfluencer content categorization, sentiment trends, and the prevalence and role of disclaimers, offering empirical insights that inform recommendations for safer and more transparent financial communication on social media.

Related papers

• The Actual Usage Of Cryptocurrency By Individuals [0.0]
  Social media platforms, influencers, and financial analysts play a central role in driving public interest and investment behavior.<n>This study investigates how media influence and educational resources shape individual engagement with cryptocurrencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T05:52:20Z)
• Community Moderation and the New Epistemology of Fact Checking on Social Media [124.26693978503339]
  Social media platforms have traditionally relied on independent fact-checking organizations to identify and flag misleading content.<n>X (formerly Twitter) and Meta have shifted towards community-driven content moderation by launching their own versions of crowd-sourced fact-checking.<n>We examine the current approaches to misinformation detection across major platforms, explore the emerging role of community-driven moderation, and critically evaluate both the promises and challenges of crowd-checking at scale.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T14:50:18Z)
• Synthetic Social Media Influence Experimentation via an Agentic Reinforcement Learning Large Language Model Bot [7.242974711907219]
  This study provides a novel simulated environment that combines agentic intelligence with Large Language Models (LLMs) to test topic-specific influence mechanisms.<n>Our framework contains agents that generate posts, form opinions on specific topics, and socially follow/unfollow each other based on the outcome of discussions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T11:37:12Z)
• MisinfoEval: Generative AI in the Era of "Alternative Facts" [50.069577397751175]
  We introduce a framework for generating and evaluating large language model (LLM) based misinformation interventions. We present (1) an experiment with a simulated social media environment to measure effectiveness of misinformation interventions, and (2) a second experiment with personalized explanations tailored to the demographics and beliefs of users. Our findings confirm that LLM-based interventions are highly effective at correcting user behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T18:16:50Z)
• Influencer Cartels [0.0]
  Group of influencers collude to increase their advertising revenue by inflating their engagement. Our theoretical model shows that influencer cartels can improve consumer welfare if they expand social media engagement to the target audience. We empirically examine influencer cartels using novel datasets and machine learning tools, and derive policy implications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T16:29:49Z)
• Understanding Divergent Framing of the Supreme Court Controversies: Social Media vs. News Outlets [56.67097829383139]
  We focus on the nuanced distinctions in framing of social media and traditional media outlets concerning a series of U.S. Supreme Court rulings. We observe significant polarization in the news media's treatment of affirmative action and abortion rights, whereas the topic of student loans tends to exhibit a greater degree of consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T06:40:21Z)
• Investigating Online Financial Misinformation and Its Consequences: A Computational Perspective [31.24530091590395]
  This research paper aims to provide a comprehensive survey of online financial misinformation, including its types, sources, and impacts. Early detection and mitigation strategies can help protect investors, enhance market transparency, and preserve financial stability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-06T02:50:16Z)
• InfluencerRank: Discovering Effective Influencers via Graph Convolutional Attentive Recurrent Neural Networks [15.461845673443804]
  We propose InfluencerRank that ranks influencers by their effectiveness based on their posting behaviors and social relations over time. Experiments have been conducted on an Instagram dataset that consists of 18,397 influencers with their 2,952,075 posts published within 12 months.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T15:48:08Z)
• Investigating Participation Mechanisms in EU Code Week [68.8204255655161]
  Digital competence (DC) is a broad set of skills, attitudes, and knowledge for confident, critical and use of digital technologies. The aim of the manuscript is to offer a detailed and comprehensive statistical description of Code Week's participation in the EU Member States.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-29T19:16:03Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• An Agenda for Disinformation Research [3.083055913556838]
  Disinformation erodes trust in the socio-political institutions that are the fundamental fabric of democracy. The distribution of false, misleading, or inaccurate information with the intent to deceive is an existential threat to the United States. New tools and approaches must be developed to leverage these affordances to understand and address this growing challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-15T19:32:36Z)
• Causal Understanding of Fake News Dissemination on Social Media [50.4854427067898]
  We argue that it is critical to understand what user attributes potentially cause users to share fake news. In fake news dissemination, confounders can be characterized by fake news sharing behavior that inherently relates to user attributes and online activities. We propose a principled approach to alleviating selection bias in fake news dissemination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T19:37:04Z)
• Quantifying the Vulnerabilities of the Online Public Square to Adversarial Manipulation Tactics [43.98568073610101]
  We use a social media model to quantify the impacts of several adversarial manipulation tactics on the quality of content. We find that the presence of influential accounts, a hallmark of social media, exacerbates the vulnerabilities of online communities to manipulation. These insights suggest countermeasures that platforms could employ to increase the resilience of social media users to manipulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-13T21:12:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.