Can Language Models Understand Social Behavior in Clinical Conversations?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.04152v1
• Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 06:03:37 GMT
• Title: Can Language Models Understand Social Behavior in Clinical Conversations?
• Authors: Manas Satish Bedmutha, Feng Chen, Andrea Hartzler, Trevor Cohen, Nadir Weibel,
• Abstract summary: Social signals are conveyed through non-verbal cues and shape the quality of the patient-provider relationship.<n>Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated an increasing ability to infer emotional and social behaviors.<n>We present the first system capable of tracking all these 20 coded signals, and uncover patterns in LLM behavior.
• Score: 13.269701124756978
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Effective communication between providers and their patients influences health and care outcomes. The effectiveness of such conversations has been linked not only to the exchange of clinical information, but also to a range of interpersonal behaviors; commonly referred to as social signals, which are often conveyed through non-verbal cues and shape the quality of the patient-provider relationship. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated an increasing ability to infer emotional and social behaviors even when analyzing only textual information. As automation increases also in clinical settings, such as for transcription of patient-provider conversations, there is growing potential for LLMs to automatically analyze and extract social behaviors from these interactions. To explore the foundational capabilities of LLMs in tracking social signals in clinical dialogue, we designed task-specific prompts and evaluated model performance across multiple architectures and prompting styles using a highly imbalanced, annotated dataset spanning 20 distinct social signals such as provider dominance, patient warmth, etc. We present the first system capable of tracking all these 20 coded signals, and uncover patterns in LLM behavior. Further analysis of model configurations and clinical context provides insights for enhancing LLM performance on social signal processing tasks in healthcare settings.

Related papers

• Reasoning Is Not All You Need: Examining LLMs for Multi-Turn Mental Health Conversations [13.064927179032756]
  We introduce MedAgent, a novel framework for synthetically generating realistic, multi-turn mental health sensemaking conversations.<n>We present MultiSenseEval, a holistic framework to evaluate the multi-turn conversation abilities of LLMs in healthcare settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T16:42:02Z)
• LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
  This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment.<n>We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews.<n>Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z)
• PALLM: Evaluating and Enhancing PALLiative Care Conversations with Large Language Models [10.258261180305439]
  Large language models (LLMs) offer a new approach to assessing complex communication metrics. LLMs offer the potential to advance the field through integration into passive sensing and just-in-time intervention systems. This study explores LLMs as evaluators of palliative care communication quality, leveraging their linguistic, in-context learning, and reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T16:39:12Z)
• Multimodal Fusion with LLMs for Engagement Prediction in Natural Conversation [70.52558242336988]
  We focus on predicting engagement in dyadic interactions by scrutinizing verbal and non-verbal cues, aiming to detect signs of disinterest or confusion. In this work, we collect a dataset featuring 34 participants engaged in casual dyadic conversations, each providing self-reported engagement ratings at the end of each conversation. We introduce a novel fusion strategy using Large Language Models (LLMs) to integrate multiple behavior modalities into a multimodal transcript''
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T18:28:12Z)
• PersLLM: A Personified Training Approach for Large Language Models [66.16513246245401]
  We propose PersLLM, integrating psychology-grounded principles of personality: social practice, consistency, and dynamic development. We incorporate personality traits directly into the model parameters, enhancing the model's resistance to induction, promoting consistency, and supporting the dynamic evolution of personality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T08:13:22Z)
• Toward Automated Detection of Biased Social Signals from the Content of Clinical Conversations [17.62785999112639]
  Implicit bias can impede patient-provider interactions and lead to inequities in care. We used automated speech recognition (ASR) and natural language processing (NLP) to identify social signals in patient-provider interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T17:20:37Z)
• Quantifying AI Psychology: A Psychometrics Benchmark for Large Language Models [57.518784855080334]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional task-solving capabilities, increasingly adopting roles akin to human-like assistants. This paper presents a framework for investigating psychology dimension in LLMs, including psychological identification, assessment dataset curation, and assessment with results validation. We introduce a comprehensive psychometrics benchmark for LLMs that covers six psychological dimensions: personality, values, emotion, theory of mind, motivation, and intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T16:09:08Z)
• Dr-LLaVA: Visual Instruction Tuning with Symbolic Clinical Grounding [53.629132242389716]
  Vision-Language Models (VLM) can support clinicians by analyzing medical images and engaging in natural language interactions. VLMs often exhibit "hallucinogenic" behavior, generating textual outputs not grounded in contextual multimodal information. We propose a new alignment algorithm that uses symbolic representations of clinical reasoning to ground VLMs in medical knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T23:19:28Z)
• Chain-of-Interaction: Enhancing Large Language Models for Psychiatric Behavior Understanding by Dyadic Contexts [4.403408362362806]
  We introduce the Chain-of-Interaction prompting method to contextualize large language models for psychiatric decision support by the dyadic interactions. This approach enables large language models to leverage the coding scheme, patient state, and domain knowledge for patient behavioral coding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T17:47:49Z)
• AntEval: Evaluation of Social Interaction Competencies in LLM-Driven Agents [65.16893197330589]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their ability to replicate human behaviors across a wide range of scenarios. However, their capability in handling complex, multi-character social interactions has yet to be fully explored. We introduce the Multi-Agent Interaction Evaluation Framework (AntEval), encompassing a novel interaction framework and evaluation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T11:18:00Z)
• MedNgage: A Dataset for Understanding Engagement in Patient-Nurse Conversations [4.847266237348932]
  Patients who effectively manage their symptoms often demonstrate higher levels of engagement in conversations and interventions with healthcare practitioners. It is crucial for AI systems to understand the engagement in natural conversations between patients and practitioners to better contribute toward patient care. We present a novel dataset (MedNgage) which consists of patient-nurse conversations about cancer symptom management.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T16:06:07Z)
• Co-Located Human-Human Interaction Analysis using Nonverbal Cues: A Survey [71.43956423427397]
  We aim to identify the nonverbal cues and computational methodologies resulting in effective performance. This survey differs from its counterparts by involving the widest spectrum of social phenomena and interaction settings. Some major observations are: the most often used nonverbal cue, computational method, interaction environment, and sensing approach are speaking activity, support vector machines, and meetings composed of 3-4 persons equipped with microphones and cameras, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T13:37:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.