Reasoning Is Not All You Need: Examining LLMs for Multi-Turn Mental Health Conversations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.20201v2
- Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 15:55:49 GMT
- Title: Reasoning Is Not All You Need: Examining LLMs for Multi-Turn Mental Health Conversations
- Authors: Mohit Chandra, Siddharth Sriraman, Harneet Singh Khanuja, Yiqiao Jin, Munmun De Choudhury,
- Abstract summary: We introduce MedAgent, a novel framework for synthetically generating realistic, multi-turn mental health sensemaking conversations.<n>We present MultiSenseEval, a holistic framework to evaluate the multi-turn conversation abilities of LLMs in healthcare settings.
- Score: 13.064927179032756
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Limited access to mental healthcare, extended wait times, and increasing capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led individuals to turn to LLMs for fulfilling their mental health needs. However, examining the multi-turn mental health conversation capabilities of LLMs remains under-explored. Existing evaluation frameworks typically focus on diagnostic accuracy and win-rates and often overlook alignment with patient-specific goals, values, and personalities required for meaningful conversations. To address this, we introduce MedAgent, a novel framework for synthetically generating realistic, multi-turn mental health sensemaking conversations and use it to create the Mental Health Sensemaking Dialogue (MHSD) dataset, comprising over 2,200 patient-LLM conversations. Additionally, we present MultiSenseEval, a holistic framework to evaluate the multi-turn conversation abilities of LLMs in healthcare settings using human-centric criteria. Our findings reveal that frontier reasoning models yield below-par performance for patient-centric communication and struggle at advanced diagnostic capabilities with average score of 31%. Additionally, we observed variation in model performance based on patient's persona and performance drop with increasing turns in the conversation. Our work provides a comprehensive synthetic data generation framework, a dataset and evaluation framework for assessing LLMs in multi-turn mental health conversations.
Related papers
- Reframe Your Life Story: Interactive Narrative Therapist and Innovative Moment Assessment with Large Language Models [92.93521294357058]
Narrative therapy helps individuals transform problematic life stories into empowering alternatives.<n>Current approaches lack realism in specialized psychotherapy and fail to capture therapeutic progression over time.<n>Int (Interactive Narrative Therapist) simulates expert narrative therapists by planning therapeutic stages, guiding reflection levels, and generating contextually appropriate expert-like responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-27T11:52:09Z) - Can Language Models Understand Social Behavior in Clinical Conversations? [13.269701124756978]
Social signals are conveyed through non-verbal cues and shape the quality of the patient-provider relationship.<n>Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated an increasing ability to infer emotional and social behaviors.<n>We present the first system capable of tracking all these 20 coded signals, and uncover patterns in LLM behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-07T06:03:37Z) - Conversation AI Dialog for Medicare powered by Finetuning and Retrieval Augmented Generation [0.0]
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in natural language processing tasks, including dialogue generation.<n>This research aims to conduct a novel comparative analysis of two prominent techniques, fine-tuning with LoRA and the Retrieval-Augmented Generation framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-04T11:50:40Z) - LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment.<n>We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews.<n>Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z) - Quantifying AI Psychology: A Psychometrics Benchmark for Large Language Models [57.518784855080334]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional task-solving capabilities, increasingly adopting roles akin to human-like assistants.
This paper presents a framework for investigating psychology dimension in LLMs, including psychological identification, assessment dataset curation, and assessment with results validation.
We introduce a comprehensive psychometrics benchmark for LLMs that covers six psychological dimensions: personality, values, emotion, theory of mind, motivation, and intelligence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-25T16:09:08Z) - Leveraging Large Language Models for Patient Engagement: The Power of Conversational AI in Digital Health [1.8772687384996551]
Large language models (LLMs) have opened up new opportunities for transforming patient engagement in healthcare through conversational AI.
We showcase the power of LLMs in handling unstructured conversational data through four case studies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-19T16:02:04Z) - LLM Questionnaire Completion for Automatic Psychiatric Assessment [49.1574468325115]
We employ a Large Language Model (LLM) to convert unstructured psychological interviews into structured questionnaires spanning various psychiatric and personality domains.
The obtained answers are coded as features, which are used to predict standardized psychiatric measures of depression (PHQ-8) and PTSD (PCL-C)
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-09T09:03:11Z) - Dr-LLaVA: Visual Instruction Tuning with Symbolic Clinical Grounding [53.629132242389716]
Vision-Language Models (VLM) can support clinicians by analyzing medical images and engaging in natural language interactions.
VLMs often exhibit "hallucinogenic" behavior, generating textual outputs not grounded in contextual multimodal information.
We propose a new alignment algorithm that uses symbolic representations of clinical reasoning to ground VLMs in medical knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-29T23:19:28Z) - A Novel Nuanced Conversation Evaluation Framework for Large Language Models in Mental Health [42.711913023646915]
We propose a novel framework for evaluating the nuanced conversation abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)
Within it, we develop a series of quantitative metrics developed from literature on using psychotherapy conversation analysis literature.
We use our framework to evaluate several popular frontier LLMs, including some GPT and Llama models, through a verified mental health dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-08T23:46:37Z) - AI Hospital: Benchmarking Large Language Models in a Multi-agent Medical Interaction Simulator [69.51568871044454]
We introduce textbfAI Hospital, a framework simulating dynamic medical interactions between emphDoctor as player and NPCs.
This setup allows for realistic assessments of LLMs in clinical scenarios.
We develop the Multi-View Medical Evaluation benchmark, utilizing high-quality Chinese medical records and NPCs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T06:46:48Z) - Conversational Health Agents: A Personalized LLM-Powered Agent Framework [1.4597673707346281]
Conversational Health Agents (CHAs) are interactive systems that provide healthcare services, such as assistance and diagnosis.
We propose openCHA, an open-source framework to empower conversational agents to generate a personalized response for users' healthcare queries.
openCHA includes an orchestrator to plan and execute actions for gathering information from external sources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-03T18:54:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.