Benchmarking LLM Faithfulness in RAG with Evolving Leaderboards

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.04847v2
• Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2025 15:46:58 GMT
• Title: Benchmarking LLM Faithfulness in RAG with Evolving Leaderboards
• Authors: Manveer Singh Tamber, Forrest Sheng Bao, Chenyu Xu, Ge Luo, Suleman Kazi, Minseok Bae, Miaoran Li, Ofer Mendelevitch, Renyi Qu, Jimmy Lin,
• Abstract summary: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) aims to reduce hallucinations by grounding responses in external context.<n>LLMs still frequently introduce unsupported information or contradictions even when provided with relevant context.<n>This paper presents two complementary efforts at Vectara to measure and benchmark LLM faithfulness in RAG.
• Score: 35.25220876573924
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) aims to reduce hallucinations by grounding responses in external context, yet large language models (LLMs) still frequently introduce unsupported information or contradictions even when provided with relevant context. This paper presents two complementary efforts at Vectara to measure and benchmark LLM faithfulness in RAG. First, we describe our original hallucination leaderboard, which has tracked hallucination rates for LLMs since 2023 using our HHEM hallucination detection model. Motivated by limitations observed in current hallucination detection methods, we introduce FaithJudge, an LLM-as-a-judge framework that leverages a pool of diverse human-annotated hallucination examples to substantially improve the automated hallucination evaluation of LLMs. We introduce an enhanced hallucination leaderboard centered on FaithJudge that benchmarks LLMs on RAG faithfulness in summarization, question-answering, and data-to-text generation tasks. FaithJudge enables a more reliable benchmarking of LLM hallucinations in RAG and supports the development of more trustworthy generative AI systems: https://github.com/vectara/FaithJudge.

Related papers

• HalluLens: LLM Hallucination Benchmark [49.170128733508335]
  Large language models (LLMs) often generate responses that deviate from user input or training data, a phenomenon known as "hallucination"<n>This paper introduces a comprehensive hallucination benchmark, incorporating both new extrinsic and existing intrinsic evaluation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-24T13:40:27Z)
• A Survey of Hallucination in Large Visual Language Models [48.794850395309076]
  The existence of hallucinations has limited the potential and practical effectiveness of LVLM in various fields. The structure of LVLMs and main causes of hallucination generation are introduced. The available hallucination evaluation benchmarks for LVLMs are presented.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T10:58:58Z)
• Hallucination Detection: Robustly Discerning Reliable Answers in Large Language Models [70.19081534515371]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption in various natural language processing tasks. They generate unfaithful or inconsistent content that deviates from the input source, leading to severe consequences. We propose a robust discriminator named RelD to effectively detect hallucination in LLMs' generated answers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T18:47:42Z)
• LLM Internal States Reveal Hallucination Risk Faced With a Query [62.29558761326031]
  Humans have a self-awareness process that allows us to recognize what we don't know when faced with queries. This paper investigates whether Large Language Models can estimate their own hallucination risk before response generation. By a probing estimator, we leverage LLM self-assessment, achieving an average hallucination estimation accuracy of 84.32% at run time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T17:08:52Z)
• Analyzing LLM Behavior in Dialogue Summarization: Unveiling Circumstantial Hallucination Trends [38.86240794422485]
  We evaluate the faithfulness of large language models for dialogue summarization. Our evaluation reveals subtleties as to what constitutes a hallucination. We introduce two prompt-based approaches for fine-grained error detection that outperform existing metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T17:49:47Z)
• HaluEval-Wild: Evaluating Hallucinations of Language Models in the Wild [41.86776426516293]
  Hallucinations pose a significant challenge to the reliability of large language models (LLMs) in critical domains. We introduce HaluEval-Wild, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate LLM hallucinations in the wild.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T08:25:46Z)
• RAGged Edges: The Double-Edged Sword of Retrieval-Augmented Chatbots [6.893551641325889]
  ChatGPT's tendency to hallucinate -- generate plausible but false information -- poses a significant challenge. This paper explores how Retrieval-Augmented Generation can counter hallucinations by integrating external knowledge with prompts. Our results show that RAG increases accuracy in some cases, but can still be misled when prompts directly contradict the model's pre-trained understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-02T12:19:04Z)
• A Survey on Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models [18.540878498840435]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have attracted growing attention within the AI landscape for its practical implementation potential. However, hallucination'', or more specifically, the misalignment between factual visual content and corresponding textual generation, poses a significant challenge of utilizing LVLMs. We dissect LVLM-related hallucinations in an attempt to establish an overview and facilitate future mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T00:33:21Z)
• The Dawn After the Dark: An Empirical Study on Factuality Hallucination in Large Language Models [134.6697160940223]
  hallucination poses great challenge to trustworthy and reliable deployment of large language models. Three key questions should be well studied: how to detect hallucinations (detection), why do LLMs hallucinate (source), and what can be done to mitigate them. This work presents a systematic empirical study on LLM hallucination, focused on the the three aspects of hallucination detection, source and mitigation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-06T12:40:45Z)
• RAGTruth: A Hallucination Corpus for Developing Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Language Models [9.465753274663061]
  Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has become a main technique for alleviating hallucinations in large language models (LLMs) This paper presents RAGTruth, a corpus tailored for analyzing word-level hallucinations in various domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T04:43:45Z)
• Alleviating Hallucinations of Large Language Models through Induced Hallucinations [67.35512483340837]
  Large language models (LLMs) have been observed to generate responses that include inaccurate or fabricated information. We propose a simple textitInduce-then-Contrast Decoding (ICD) strategy to alleviate hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-25T12:32:49Z)
• A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questions [40.79317187623401]
  The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has marked a significant breakthrough in natural language processing (NLP) LLMs are prone to hallucination, generating plausible yet nonfactual content. This phenomenon raises significant concerns over the reliability of LLMs in real-world information retrieval systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T09:25:37Z)
• Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models [116.01843550398183]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a range of downstream tasks. LLMs occasionally generate content that diverges from the user input, contradicts previously generated context, or misaligns with established world knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-03T16:56:48Z)
• Evaluation and Analysis of Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models [49.19829480199372]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have recently achieved remarkable success. LVLMs are still plagued by the hallucination problem. Hallucination refers to the information of LVLMs' responses that does not exist in the visual input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-29T08:51:24Z)
• Evaluating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models [122.40337582958453]
  This work presents the first systematic study on object hallucination of large vision-language models (LVLMs) We find that LVLMs tend to generate objects that are inconsistent with the target images in the descriptions. We propose a polling-based query method called POPE to evaluate the object hallucination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T16:34:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.