Enhancing Treatment Effect Estimation via Active Learning: A Counterfactual Covering Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05242v1
• Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 13:42:00 GMT
• Title: Enhancing Treatment Effect Estimation via Active Learning: A Counterfactual Covering Perspective
• Authors: Hechuan Wen, Tong Chen, Mingming Gong, Li Kheng Chai, Shazia Sadiq, Hongzhi Yin,
• Abstract summary: Complex algorithms for treatment effect estimation are ineffective when handling insufficiently labeled training sets.<n>We propose FCCM, which transforms the optimization objective into the textitFactual and textitCounterfactual Coverage Maximization to ensure effective radius reduction during data acquisition.<n> benchmarking FCCM against other baselines demonstrates its superiority across both fully synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets.
• Score: 61.284843894545475
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Although numerous complex algorithms for treatment effect estimation have been developed in recent years, their effectiveness remains limited when handling insufficiently labeled training sets due to the high cost of labeling the effect after treatment, e.g., expensive tumor imaging or biopsy procedures needed to evaluate treatment effects. Therefore, it becomes essential to actively incorporate more high-quality labeled data, all while adhering to a constrained labeling budget. To enable data-efficient treatment effect estimation, we formalize the problem through rigorous theoretical analysis within the active learning context, where the derived key measures -- \textit{factual} and \textit{counterfactual covering radius} determine the risk upper bound. To reduce the bound, we propose a greedy radius reduction algorithm, which excels under an idealized, balanced data distribution. To generalize to more realistic data distributions, we further propose FCCM, which transforms the optimization objective into the \textit{Factual} and \textit{Counterfactual Coverage Maximization} to ensure effective radius reduction during data acquisition. Furthermore, benchmarking FCCM against other baselines demonstrates its superiority across both fully synthetic and semi-synthetic datasets.

Related papers

• Progressive Generalization Risk Reduction for Data-Efficient Causal Effect Estimation [30.49865329385806]
  Causal effect estimation (CEE) provides a crucial tool for predicting the unobserved counterfactual outcome for an entity. In this paper, we study a more realistic CEE setting where the labelled data samples are scarce at the beginning. We propose the Model Agnostic Causal Active Learning (MACAL) algorithm for batch-wise label acquisition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T03:17:40Z)
• Adaptive-TMLE for the Average Treatment Effect based on Randomized Controlled Trial Augmented with Real-World Data [0.0]
  We consider the problem of estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) when both randomized control trial (RCT) data and external real-world data (RWD) are available.<n>We introduce an adaptive targeted maximum likelihood estimation framework to estimate them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-12T07:10:26Z)
• Efficient adjustment for complex covariates: Gaining efficiency with DOPE [56.537164957672715]
  We propose a framework that accommodates adjustment for any subset of information expressed by the covariates. Based on our theoretical results, we propose the Debiased Outcome-adapted Propensity Estorimator (DOPE) for efficient estimation of the average treatment effect (ATE) Our results show that the DOPE provides an efficient and robust methodology for ATE estimation in various observational settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T13:02:51Z)
• Flexible Nonparametric Inference for Causal Effects under the Front-Door Model [2.6900047294457683]
  We develop novel one-step and targeted minimum loss-based estimators for both the average treatment effect and the average treatment effect on the treated under front-door assumptions.<n>Our estimators are built on multiple parameterizations of the observed data distribution, including approaches that avoid mediator density entirely.<n>We show how these constraints can be leveraged to improve the efficiency of causal effect estimators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T22:04:53Z)
• B-Learner: Quasi-Oracle Bounds on Heterogeneous Causal Effects Under Hidden Confounding [51.74479522965712]
  We propose a meta-learner called the B-Learner, which can efficiently learn sharp bounds on the CATE function under limits on hidden confounding. We prove its estimates are valid, sharp, efficient, and have a quasi-oracle property with respect to the constituent estimators under more general conditions than existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-20T18:07:19Z)
• Gaining Outlier Resistance with Progressive Quantiles: Fast Algorithms and Theoretical Studies [1.6457778420360534]
  A framework of outlier-resistant estimation is introduced to robustify arbitrarily loss function. A new technique is proposed to alleviate the requirement on starting point such that on regular datasets the number of data reestimations can be substantially reduced. The obtained estimators, though not necessarily globally or even globally, enjoymax optimality in both low dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-15T20:35:21Z)
• Assessment of Treatment Effect Estimators for Heavy-Tailed Data [70.72363097550483]
  A central obstacle in the objective assessment of treatment effect (TE) estimators in randomized control trials (RCTs) is the lack of ground truth (or validation set) to test their performance. We provide a novel cross-validation-like methodology to address this challenge. We evaluate our methodology across 709 RCTs implemented in the Amazon supply chain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-14T17:53:01Z)
• Causal-BALD: Deep Bayesian Active Learning of Outcomes to Infer Treatment-Effects from Observational Data [37.15330590319357]
  Existing approaches rely on fitting deep models on outcomes observed for treated and control populations. Deep Bayesian active learning provides a framework for efficient data acquisition by selecting points with high uncertainty. We introduce causal, Bayesian acquisition functions grounded in information theory that bias data acquisition towards regions with overlapping support.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T15:11:39Z)
• Statistical control for spatio-temporal MEG/EEG source imaging with desparsified multi-task Lasso [102.84915019938413]
  Non-invasive techniques like magnetoencephalography (MEG) or electroencephalography (EEG) offer promise of non-invasive techniques. The problem of source localization, or source imaging, poses however a high-dimensional statistical inference challenge. We propose an ensemble of desparsified multi-task Lasso (ecd-MTLasso) to deal with this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-29T21:17:16Z)
• Causal Inference of General Treatment Effects using Neural Networks with A Diverging Number of Confounders [12.105996764226227]
  Under the unconfoundedness condition, adjustment for confounders requires estimating the nuisance functions relating outcome or treatment to confounders nonparametrically. This paper considers a generalized optimization framework for efficient estimation of general treatment effects using artificial neural networks (ANNs) to approximate the unknown nuisance function of growing-dimensional confounders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-15T13:07:24Z)
• Provably Efficient Causal Reinforcement Learning with Confounded Observational Data [135.64775986546505]
  We study how to incorporate the dataset (observational data) collected offline, which is often abundantly available in practice, to improve the sample efficiency in the online setting. We propose the deconfounded optimistic value iteration (DOVI) algorithm, which incorporates the confounded observational data in a provably efficient manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T14:49:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.