An Automated LLM-based Pipeline for Asset-Level Database Creation to Assess Deforestation Impact

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05494v1
• Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 15:17:27 GMT
• Title: An Automated LLM-based Pipeline for Asset-Level Database Creation to Assess Deforestation Impact
• Abstract summary: The European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) requires companies to prove their products do not contribute to deforestation.<n>Current databases lack the necessary detail, relying heavily on broad financial metrics and manual data collection.<n>This study presents an automated, end-to-end data extraction pipeline that uses LLMs to create, clean, and validate structured databases.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) requires companies to prove their products do not contribute to deforestation, creating a critical demand for precise, asset-level environmental impact data. Current databases lack the necessary detail, relying heavily on broad financial metrics and manual data collection, which limits regulatory compliance and accurate environmental modeling. This study presents an automated, end-to-end data extraction pipeline that uses LLMs to create, clean, and validate structured databases, specifically targeting sectors with a high risk of deforestation. The pipeline introduces Instructional, Role-Based, Zero-Shot Chain-of-Thought (IRZ-CoT) prompting to enhance data extraction accuracy and a Retrieval-Augmented Validation (RAV) process that integrates real-time web searches for improved data reliability. Applied to SEC EDGAR filings in the Mining, Oil & Gas, and Utilities sectors, the pipeline demonstrates significant improvements over traditional zero-shot prompting approaches, particularly in extraction accuracy and validation coverage. This work advances NLP-driven automation for regulatory compliance, CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility), and ESG, with broad sectoral applicability.

Related papers

• From Regulation to Implementation: A Critical Evaluation of LLM-Assisted Regulatory Compliance in Industry [0.0]
  This study investigates how data extraction instructions and vagueness impact the quality and consistency of compliance artifacts.<n>The resulting artifacts are evaluated by benchmarking different models against manually created ground-to-ground schemas.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-21T17:27:13Z)
• Controllable and Verifiable Tool-Use Data Synthesis for Agentic Reinforcement Learning [82.89535601592739]
  We propose a two-stage pipeline that generates reliable base tool-use trajectories through self-evolving synthesis with multi-level validation.<n>These augmentations introduce distractor tools, indirect or ambiguous user queries, and noisy, multi-format, or erroneous tool outputs.<n>This design enables automatic reward computation via reference matching for standard cases and lightweight judge-assisted verification for special behaviors such as error detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-10T18:38:52Z)
• Generate, Filter, Control, Replay: A Comprehensive Survey of Rollout Strategies for LLM Reinforcement Learning [79.88942231770629]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a central post-training tool for improving the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>We formalize rollout pipelines with unified notation and introduce Generate-Filter-Control-Replay (GFCR)<n>We synthesize methods spanning RL with verifiable rewards, process supervision, judge-based gating, guided and tree/segment rollouts, adaptive compute allocation, early-exit and partial rollouts, throughput optimization, and replay/recomposition for self-improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-08T00:53:29Z)
• kRAIG: A Natural Language-Driven Agent for Automated DataOps Pipeline Generation [0.5833117322405447]
  We introduce kRAIG, an AI agent that translates natural language specifications into production-ready KubeReason Pipelines (KFP)<n>To resolve ambiguity in user intent, we propose ReQuesAct, an interaction framework that explicitly clarifies intent prior to pipeline synthesis.<n>Our framework achieves a 3x improvement in extraction and loading success and a 25 percent increase in transformation accuracy compared to state-of-the-art agentic baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T17:53:00Z)
• Is Conformal Factuality for RAG-based LLMs Robust? Novel Metrics and Systematic Insights [7.594584500009769]
  Large language models (LLMs) frequently hallucinate, limiting their reliability in knowledge-intensive applications.<n>Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and conformal factuality have emerged as potential ways to address this limitation.<n>We analyze the reliability and usefulness of conformal factuality for RAG-based LLMs across generation, scoring, calibration, robustness, and efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-17T17:20:08Z)
• GUI-Libra: Training Native GUI Agents to Reason and Act with Action-aware Supervision and Partially Verifiable RL [64.8155693023222]
  Open-source native GUI agents still lag behind closed-source systems on long-horizon navigation tasks.<n>This gap stems from a shortage of high-quality, action-aligned reasoning data.<n>We present GUI-Libra, a tailored training recipe that addresses these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T18:34:57Z)
• Can LLMs Clean Up Your Mess? A Survey of Application-Ready Data Preparation with LLMs [66.63911043019294]
  Data preparation aims to denoise raw datasets, uncover cross-dataset relationships, and extract valuable insights from them.<n>This paper focuses on the use of LLM techniques to prepare data for diverse downstream tasks.<n>We introduce a task-centric taxonomy that organizes the field into three major tasks: data cleaning, standardization, error processing, imputation, data integration, and data enrichment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T12:02:45Z)
• Towards Comprehensive Stage-wise Benchmarking of Large Language Models in Fact-Checking [64.97768177044355]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in real-world fact-checking systems.<n>We present FactArena, a fully automated arena-style evaluation framework.<n>Our analyses reveal significant discrepancies between static claim-verification accuracy and end-to-end fact-checking competence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-06T02:51:56Z)
• Task-Aware Reduction for Scalable LLM-Database Systems [0.0]
  We argue for treating the token budget of an LLM as an attention budget and elevating task-aware text reduction as a first-class design principle for language -- data systems.<n>We outline open research challenges for building benchmarks, designing adaptive reduction pipelines, and integrating token-budget-aware preprocessing into database and retrieval systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-13T18:10:03Z)
• Engineering Trustworthy Machine-Learning Operations with Zero-Knowledge Proofs [1.7723990552388873]
  Zero-Knowledge Proofs (ZKPs) offer a cryptographic solution that enables provers to demonstrate, through verified computations, adherence to set requirements without revealing sensitive model details or data.<n>We identify five key properties (non-interactivity, transparent setup, standard representations, succinctness, and post-quantum security) critical for their application in AI validation and verification pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T15:39:11Z)
• Privacy-Preserving Federated Embedding Learning for Localized Retrieval-Augmented Generation [60.81109086640437]
  We propose a novel framework called Federated Retrieval-Augmented Generation (FedE4RAG)<n>FedE4RAG facilitates collaborative training of client-side RAG retrieval models.<n>We apply homomorphic encryption within federated learning to safeguard model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-27T04:26:02Z)
• TVR: Automotive System Requirement Traceability Validation and Recovery Through Retrieval-Augmented Generation [7.50061902435987]
  Traceability between stakeholder requirements and system requirements is crucial to ensure consistency, correctness, and regulatory compliance.<n>Existing approaches do not address traceability between stakeholder and system requirements, rely on open-source data, and do not address the validation of manual links established by engineers.<n>We introduce TVR, a requirement Traceability Validation and Recovery approach primarily targeting automotive systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T20:37:23Z)
• Lawful and Accountable Personal Data Processing with GDPR-based Access and Usage Control in Distributed Systems [0.0]
  This paper proposes a case-generic method for automated normative reasoning that establishes legal arguments for the lawfulness of data processing activities.<n>The arguments are established on the basis of case-specific legal qualifications made by privacy experts, bringing the human in the loop.<n>The resulting system is designed and critically assessed in reference to requirements extracted from the GPDR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T10:49:34Z)
• Optimizing Product Provenance Verification using Data Valuation Methods [24.59951827145763]
  We introduce a novel data valuation framework designed to enhance the selection and utilization of training data for machine learning models applied in Stable Isotope Ratio Analysis (SIRA)<n>We validate our methodology with extensive experiments, demonstrating its potential to significantly enhance provenance verification, mitigate fraudulent trade practices, and strengthen regulatory enforcement of global supply chains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T03:16:19Z)
• The Dual-use Dilemma in LLMs: Do Empowering Ethical Capacities Make a Degraded Utility? [54.18519360412294]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) must balance between rejecting harmful requests for safety and accommodating legitimate ones for utility.<n>This paper presents a Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) based alignment framework that achieves better overall performance.<n>We analyze experimental results obtained from testing DeepSeek-R1 on our benchmark and reveal the critical ethical concerns raised by this highly acclaimed model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T06:35:01Z)
• Climate AI for Corporate Decarbonization Metrics Extraction [7.522638089716454]
  We introduce the Climate Artificial Intelligence for Corporate Decarbonization Metrics Extraction (CAI) model and pipeline. We demonstrate that the process improves data collection efficiency and accuracy by automating data curation, validation, and metric scoring from public corporate disclosures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-05T18:37:51Z)
• Enhancing Legal Compliance and Regulation Analysis with Large Language Models [0.0]
  This research explores the application of Large Language Models (LLMs) to accurately classify legal provisions and automate compliance checks. Our findings demonstrate promising results, indicating LLMs' significant potential to enhance legal compliance and regulatory analysis efficiency, notably by reducing manual workload and improving accuracy within reasonable time financial constraints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-26T16:40:49Z)
• Better Practices for Domain Adaptation [62.70267990659201]
  Domain adaptation (DA) aims to provide frameworks for adapting models to deployment data without using labels. Unclear validation protocol for DA has led to bad practices in the literature. We show challenges across all three branches of domain adaptation methodology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-07T17:44:18Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware Source-Free Adaptive Image Super-Resolution with Wavelet Augmentation Transformer [60.31021888394358]
  Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) can effectively address domain gap issues in real-world image Super-Resolution (SR) We propose a SOurce-free Domain Adaptation framework for image SR (SODA-SR) to address this issue, i.e., adapt a source-trained model to a target domain with only unlabeled target data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-31T03:14:44Z)
• Privacy Adhering Machine Un-learning in NLP [66.17039929803933]
  In real world industry use Machine Learning to build models on user data. Such mandates require effort both in terms of data as well as model retraining. continuous removal of data and model retraining steps do not scale. We propose textitMachine Unlearning to tackle this challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T16:06:45Z)
• Provably Efficient Causal Reinforcement Learning with Confounded Observational Data [135.64775986546505]
  We study how to incorporate the dataset (observational data) collected offline, which is often abundantly available in practice, to improve the sample efficiency in the online setting. We propose the deconfounded optimistic value iteration (DOVI) algorithm, which incorporates the confounded observational data in a provably efficient manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T14:49:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.