Exploration of COVID-19 Discourse on Twitter: American Politician Edition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.05687v1
• Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 23:17:03 GMT
• Title: Exploration of COVID-19 Discourse on Twitter: American Politician Edition
• Authors: Cindy Kim, Daniela Puchall, Jiangyi Liang, Jiwon Kim,
• Abstract summary: We explore the partisan differences in approach, response, and attitude towards handling the international crisis.<n>We use a collection of tweets gathered from leading American political figures online (Republican and Democratic)<n>Results suggest that Democrats are more concerned with the casualties of the pandemic, and give more medical precautions and recommendations to the public whereas Republicans are more invested in political responsibilities.
• Score: 9.221712074683033
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic has undoubtedly affected the political scene worldwide and the introduction of new terminology and public opinions regarding the virus has further polarized partisan stances. Using a collection of tweets gathered from leading American political figures online (Republican and Democratic), we explored the partisan differences in approach, response, and attitude towards handling the international crisis. Implementation of the bag-of-words, bigram, and TF-IDF models was used to identify and analyze keywords, topics, and overall sentiments from each party. Results suggest that Democrats are more concerned with the casualties of the pandemic, and give more medical precautions and recommendations to the public whereas Republicans are more invested in political responsibilities such as keeping the public updated through media and carefully watching the progress of the virus. We propose a systematic approach to predict and distinguish a tweet's political stance (left or right leaning) based on its COVID-19 related terms using different classification algorithms on different language models.

Related papers

• Analyzing political stances on Twitter in the lead-up to the 2024 U.S. election [1.2764774886497106]
  We investigate the ideological positioning of tweets related to the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election.<n>We classify ideological stances into Pro-Democrat, Anti-Republican, Pro-Republican, Anti-Democrat, and Neutral categories.<n>We find that Republican candidates author significantly more tweets in criticism of the Democratic party and its candidates than vice versa.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T07:05:34Z)
• Generative Memesis: AI Mediates Political Memes in the 2024 USA Presidential Election [1.4304078520604593]
  Using a dataset of 239,526 Instagram images, we examine the impact of different content types on user engagement during the 2024 US presidential Elections. Results show while synthetic content may not increase engagement alone, it mediates how political information is created through highly effective, often absurd, political memes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-01T17:35:05Z)
• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• The Persistence of Contrarianism on Twitter: Mapping users' sharing habits for the Ukraine war, COVID-19 vaccination, and the 2022 Midterm Elections [3.776540359831043]
  We compare three samples of Twitter data on COVID-19 vaccination, the Ukraine war and the 2022 midterm elections. Our results indicate the emergence of a broad contrarian stance that is defined by its opposition to public health narratives/policies. We confirm the existence of ideologically coherent cross-subject stances among Twitter users, but in a manner not squarely aligned with right-left political orientations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-23T18:01:45Z)
• Pandemic Culture Wars: Partisan Differences in the Moral Language of COVID-19 Discussions [7.356252425142533]
  We focus on five contentious issues: coronavirus origins, lockdowns, masking, education, and vaccines. We use state-of-the-art computational methods to analyze moral language and infer political ideology. Our findings reveal ideological differences in issue salience and moral language used by different groups.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-29T18:04:05Z)
• The Face of Populism: Examining Differences in Facial Emotional Expressions of Political Leaders Using Machine Learning [50.24983453990065]
  We use a deep-learning approach to process a sample of 220 YouTube videos of political leaders from 15 different countries. We observe statistically significant differences in the average score of negative emotions between groups of leaders with varying degrees of populist rhetoric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T18:32:49Z)
• Millions of Co-purchases and Reviews Reveal the Spread of Polarization and Lifestyle Politics across Online Markets [68.8204255655161]
  We study the pervasiveness of polarization and lifestyle politics over different product segments in a diverse market. We sample 234.6 million relations among 21.8 million market entities to find product categories that are politically relevant, aligned, and polarized. Cultural products are 4 times more polarized than any other segment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-17T18:16:37Z)
• Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization [58.720142291102135]
  A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)
• Characterizing Partisan Political Narratives about COVID-19 on Twitter [2.5599656137521425]
  We characterize and compare the pandemic narratives of the Democratic and Republican politicians on social media. By analyzing tweets from the politicians in the U.S., we uncover the contrasting narratives in terms of topics, frames, and agents. Our findings concretely expose the gaps in the "elusive consensus" between the two parties.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-11T21:24:41Z)
• Political Posters Identification with Appearance-Text Fusion [49.55696202606098]
  We propose a method that efficiently utilizes appearance features and text vectors to accurately classify political posters. The majority of this work focuses on political posters that are designed to serve as a promotion of a certain political event.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-19T16:14:51Z)
• Analyzing COVID-19 on Online Social Media: Trends, Sentiments and Emotions [44.92240076313168]
  We analyze the affective trajectories of the American people and the Chinese people based on Twitter and Weibo posts between January 20th, 2020 and May 11th 2020. By contrasting two very different countries, China and the Unites States, we reveal sharp differences in people's views on COVID-19 in different cultures. Our study provides a computational approach to unveiling public emotions and concerns on the pandemic in real-time, which would potentially help policy-makers better understand people's need and thus make optimal policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-29T09:24:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.