The Persistence of Contrarianism on Twitter: Mapping users' sharing habits for the Ukraine war, COVID-19 vaccination, and the 2022 Midterm Elections

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.16175v2
• Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 16:20:50 GMT
• Title: The Persistence of Contrarianism on Twitter: Mapping users' sharing habits for the Ukraine war, COVID-19 vaccination, and the 2022 Midterm Elections
• Authors: David Axelrod, Sangyeon Kim, John Paolillo,
• Abstract summary: We compare three samples of Twitter data on COVID-19 vaccination, the Ukraine war and the 2022 midterm elections. Our results indicate the emergence of a broad contrarian stance that is defined by its opposition to public health narratives/policies. We confirm the existence of ideologically coherent cross-subject stances among Twitter users, but in a manner not squarely aligned with right-left political orientations.
• Score: 3.776540359831043
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Empirical studies of online disinformation emphasize matters of public concern such as the COVID-19 pandemic, foreign election interference, and the Russo-Ukraine war, largely in studies that treat the topics separately. Comparatively fewer studies attempt to relate such disparate topics and address the extent to which they share behaviors. In this study, we compare three samples of Twitter data on COVID-19 vaccination, the Ukraine war and the 2022 midterm elections, to ascertain how distinct ideological stances of users across the three samples might be related. Our results indicate the emergence of a broad contrarian stance that is defined by its opposition to public health narratives/policies along with the Biden administration's foreign policy stances. Sharing activity within the contrarian position falls on a spectrum with outright conspiratorial content on one end. We confirm the existence of ideologically coherent cross-subject stances among Twitter users, but in a manner not squarely aligned with right-left political orientations.

Related papers

• HatePRISM: Policies, Platforms, and Research Integration. Advancing NLP for Hate Speech Proactive Mitigation [67.69631485036665]
  We conduct a comprehensive examination of hate speech regulations and strategies from three perspectives.<n>Our findings reveal significant inconsistencies in hate speech definitions and moderation practices across jurisdictions.<n>We suggest ideas and research direction for further exploration of a unified framework for automated hate speech moderation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-06T11:25:23Z)
• Propaganda and Information Dissemination in the Russo-Ukrainian War: Natural Language Processing of Russian and Western Twitter Narratives [0.0]
  This article provides an analysis of tweets from propaganda accounts and trusted accounts collected from the onset of the war.<n>We utilise natural language processing and machine learning algorithms to assess the sentiment and identify key themes.<n>Our findings indicate distinct strategies in how information is created, spread, and targeted at different audiences by both sides.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T15:52:04Z)
• Exploration of COVID-19 Discourse on Twitter: American Politician Edition [9.221712074683033]
  We explore the partisan differences in approach, response, and attitude towards handling the international crisis.<n>We use a collection of tweets gathered from leading American political figures online (Republican and Democratic)<n>Results suggest that Democrats are more concerned with the casualties of the pandemic, and give more medical precautions and recommendations to the public whereas Republicans are more invested in political responsibilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T23:17:03Z)
• Political Fact-Checking Efforts are Constrained by Deficiencies in Coverage, Speed, and Reach [0.0]
  This study provides the most comprehensive assessment to date of the real-world limitations faced by political fact-checking efforts. We find that fact-checks as currently developed and distributed are severely inhibited in election contexts by constraints on their coverage, speed, and reach. We provide empirical evidence which runs contrary to the assumption that misinformation is politically biased against the political right.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T19:15:08Z)
• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• YouTube COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation on Twitter: Platform Interactions and Moderation Blind Spots [0.0]
  This study explores the relationship between Twitter and YouTube in spreading COVID-19 vaccine-related misinformation. We observe that a preponderance of anti-vaccine messaging remains among users who previously shared suspect information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-27T12:55:58Z)
• Echoes through Time: Evolution of the Italian COVID-19 Vaccination Debate [3.9758527669515518]
  We use a Twitter dataset spanning September 2019 - November 2021 to examine the state of polarization around vaccination. We find the stark division between supporters and hesitant individuals to continue throughout the vaccination campaign. However, we find an increasing commonality in the topical focus of the vaccine supporters and vaccine hesitant, pointing to a possible common set of facts the two sides may agree on.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-27T13:50:19Z)
• Understanding COVID-19 Vaccine Reaction through Comparative Analysis on Twitter [10.45742327204133]
  COVID-19 vaccines have been available for several months now, but vaccine hesitancy continues to be at high levels in the United States. This paper takes a novel view of the problem by comparatively studying two Twitter datasets collected between two different time periods. We uncover several fine-grained reasons for vaccine hesitancy, some of which have become more important over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-10T17:39:10Z)
• The Spread of Propaganda by Coordinated Communities on Social Media [43.2770127582382]
  We analyze the spread of propaganda and its interplay with coordinated behavior on a large Twitter dataset about the 2019 UK general election. The combination of the use of propaganda and coordinated behavior allows us to uncover the authenticity and harmfulness of the different communities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-27T13:39:10Z)
• Reaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization [58.720142291102135]
  A way of reducing polarization would be by distributing cross-partisan news among individuals with distinct political orientations. This study investigates whether this holds in the context of nationwide elections in Brazil and Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-18T11:34:04Z)
• Detecting Propaganda on the Sentence Level during the COVID-19 Pandemic [0.0]
  malicious cyber-enabled actions may cause increasing social polarization, health crises, and property loss. Using fine-tuned contextualized embedding trained on Reddit, we tackle the detection of the propaganda of such user accounts. Our result shows that the pro-China group appeared to be tweeting 35 to 115 times more than the neutral group.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-31T06:40:17Z)
• News consumption and social media regulations policy [70.31753171707005]
  We analyze two social media that enforced opposite moderation methods, Twitter and Gab, to assess the interplay between news consumption and content regulation. Our results show that the presence of moderation pursued by Twitter produces a significant reduction of questionable content. The lack of clear regulation on Gab results in the tendency of the user to engage with both types of content, showing a slight preference for the questionable ones which may account for a dissing/endorsement behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T19:26:32Z)
• Country Image in COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of China [79.17323278601869]
  Country image has a profound influence on international relations and economic development. In the worldwide outbreak of COVID-19, countries and their people display different reactions. In this study, we take China as a specific and typical case and investigate its image with aspect-based sentiment analysis on a large-scale Twitter dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-12T15:54:51Z)
• Falling into the Echo Chamber: the Italian Vaccination Debate on Twitter [65.7192861893042]
  We examine the extent to which the vaccination debate on Twitter is conductive to potential outreach to the vaccination hesitant. We discover that the vaccination skeptics, as well as the advocates, reside in their own distinct "echo chambers" At the center of these echo chambers we find the ardent supporters, for which we build highly accurate network- and content-based classifiers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-26T13:55:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.