Towards a Unified Representation Evaluation Framework Beyond Downstream Tasks

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06224v1
• Date: Fri, 09 May 2025 17:58:52 GMT
• Title: Towards a Unified Representation Evaluation Framework Beyond Downstream Tasks
• Authors: Christos Plachouras, Julien Guinot, George Fazekas, Elio Quinton, Emmanouil Benetos, Johan Pauwels,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a standardized protocol to quantify informativeness, equivariance, invariance, and disentanglement of factors of variation in model representations.<n>We find that representations from models with similar downstream performance can behave substantially differently with regard to these attributes.
• Score: 9.390951257874187
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Downstream probing has been the dominant method for evaluating model representations, an important process given the increasing prominence of self-supervised learning and foundation models. However, downstream probing primarily assesses the availability of task-relevant information in the model's latent space, overlooking attributes such as equivariance, invariance, and disentanglement, which contribute to the interpretability, adaptability, and utility of representations in real-world applications. While some attempts have been made to measure these qualities in representations, no unified evaluation framework with modular, generalizable, and interpretable metrics exists. In this paper, we argue for the importance of representation evaluation beyond downstream probing. We introduce a standardized protocol to quantify informativeness, equivariance, invariance, and disentanglement of factors of variation in model representations. We use it to evaluate representations from a variety of models in the image and speech domains using different architectures and pretraining approaches on identified controllable factors of variation. We find that representations from models with similar downstream performance can behave substantially differently with regard to these attributes. This hints that the respective mechanisms underlying their downstream performance are functionally different, prompting new research directions to understand and improve representations.

Related papers

• Transferring Visual Explainability of Self-Explaining Models through Task Arithmetic [8.918419734720613]
  Self-explaining models that perform both tasks in a single inference are effective, but their training incurs substantial labeling and computational costs.<n>This study proposes a method to transfer the visual explainability of self-explaining models, learned in a source domain, to a target domain based on a task arithmetic framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-06T12:55:31Z)
• MASCOTS: Model-Agnostic Symbolic COunterfactual explanations for Time Series [4.664512594743523]
  We introduce MASCOTS, a method that generates meaningful and diverse counterfactual observations in a model-agnostic manner.<n>By operating in a symbolic feature space, MASCOTS enhances interpretability while preserving fidelity to the original data and model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-28T12:48:12Z)
• Explanatory Model Monitoring to Understand the Effects of Feature Shifts on Performance [61.06245197347139]
  We propose a novel approach to explain the behavior of a black-box model under feature shifts. We refer to our method that combines concepts from Optimal Transport and Shapley Values as Explanatory Performance Estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-24T18:28:19Z)
• Flow Factorized Representation Learning [109.51947536586677]
  We introduce a generative model which specifies a distinct set of latent probability paths that define different input transformations. We show that our model achieves higher likelihoods on standard representation learning benchmarks while simultaneously being closer to approximately equivariant models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-22T20:15:37Z)
• COSE: A Consistency-Sensitivity Metric for Saliency on Image Classification [21.3855970055692]
  We present a set of metrics that utilize vision priors to assess the performance of saliency methods on image classification tasks. We show that although saliency methods are thought to be architecture-independent, most methods could better explain transformer-based models over convolutional-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T01:06:44Z)
• IMACS: Image Model Attribution Comparison Summaries [16.80986701058596]
  We introduce IMACS, a method that combines gradient-based model attributions with aggregation and visualization techniques. IMACS extracts salient input features from an evaluation dataset, clusters them based on similarity, then visualizes differences in model attributions for similar input features. We show how our technique can uncover behavioral differences caused by domain shift between two models trained on satellite images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T21:35:14Z)
• Attentional Prototype Inference for Few-Shot Segmentation [128.45753577331422]
  We propose attentional prototype inference (API), a probabilistic latent variable framework for few-shot segmentation. We define a global latent variable to represent the prototype of each object category, which we model as a probabilistic distribution. We conduct extensive experiments on four benchmarks, where our proposal obtains at least competitive and often better performance than state-of-the-art prototype-based methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-14T06:58:44Z)
• How Faithful is your Synthetic Data? Sample-level Metrics for Evaluating and Auditing Generative Models [95.8037674226622]
  We introduce a 3-dimensional evaluation metric that characterizes the fidelity, diversity and generalization performance of any generative model in a domain-agnostic fashion. Our metric unifies statistical divergence measures with precision-recall analysis, enabling sample- and distribution-level diagnoses of model fidelity and diversity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-17T18:25:30Z)
• Interpretable Multi-dataset Evaluation for Named Entity Recognition [110.64368106131062]
  We present a general methodology for interpretable evaluation for the named entity recognition (NER) task. The proposed evaluation method enables us to interpret the differences in models and datasets, as well as the interplay between them. By making our analysis tool available, we make it easy for future researchers to run similar analyses and drive progress in this area.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:53:27Z)
• Improving the Reconstruction of Disentangled Representation Learners via Multi-Stage Modeling [54.94763543386523]
  Current autoencoder-based disentangled representation learning methods achieve disentanglement by penalizing the ( aggregate) posterior to encourage statistical independence of the latent factors. We present a novel multi-stage modeling approach where the disentangled factors are first learned using a penalty-based disentangled representation learning method. Then, the low-quality reconstruction is improved with another deep generative model that is trained to model the missing correlated latent variables.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-25T18:51:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.