Control Plane as a Tool: A Scalable Design Pattern for Agentic AI Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.06817v1
• Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 02:58:50 GMT
• Title: Control Plane as a Tool: A Scalable Design Pattern for Agentic AI Systems
• Abstract summary: This paper conducts a comprehensive review of the types of agents, their modes of interaction with the environment, and the infrastructural and architectural challenges that emerge.<n>We propose a reusable design abstraction: the "Control Plane as a Tool" pattern.<n>This pattern allows developers to expose a single tool interface to an agent while encapsulating modular tool routing logic behind it.
• Score: 2.997108944111501
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Agentic AI systems represent a new frontier in artificial intelligence, where agents often based on large language models(LLMs) interact with tools, environments, and other agents to accomplish tasks with a degree of autonomy. These systems show promise across a range of domains, but their architectural underpinnings remain immature. This paper conducts a comprehensive review of the types of agents, their modes of interaction with the environment, and the infrastructural and architectural challenges that emerge. We identify a gap in how these systems manage tool orchestration at scale and propose a reusable design abstraction: the "Control Plane as a Tool" pattern. This pattern allows developers to expose a single tool interface to an agent while encapsulating modular tool routing logic behind it. We position this pattern within the broader context of agent design and argue that it addresses several key challenges in scaling, safety, and extensibility.

Related papers

• Agents in the Large: Perception-Centered Architecture for Persistent Agents [66.30987129595137]
  We propose a Perception-Centered Architecture for Persistent Agents (Pera)<n>Pera describes a persistent agent organized around perception and control components that continually perceive service-relevant signals.<n>We use Pera to retrospectively organize recent work, examine a detailed case study, and offer forward-looking insights for building more capable persistent agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-31T09:04:52Z)
• Graph Engineering in the Era of LLM Agents: From Individual Intelligence to System Intelligence [115.91847478507736]
  LLMs have evolved from language generators to autonomous agents capable of complex, long-horizon tasks.<n>Many tasks require heterogeneous expertise, interdependent subtasks, parallel execution, independent verification, and persistent state.<n>We call this System Intelligence: an agent system's ability to organize and coordinate multiple intelligent components into a coherent, adaptive whole.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-21T14:27:57Z)
• Toward a Modular Architecture for Embedded AI Agent Systems at the Edge [0.0]
  This paper proposes a modular reference architecture for embedded agent systems.<n>We introduce a tiered design that decouples On-Device Agents and Cloud-Augmented Agents.<n>A key contribution is the integration of a cross-cutting Governance Layer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-01T20:24:18Z)
• Terminal Agents Suffice for Enterprise Automation [9.863750303019755]
  We argue that a coding agent equipped only with a terminal can solve many enterprise tasks more effectively by interacting directly with platform APIs.<n>Our findings suggest that simple programmatic interfaces, combined with strong foundation models, are sufficient for practical enterprise automation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-31T14:14:47Z)
• The Evolution of Tool Use in LLM Agents: From Single-Tool Call to Multi-Tool Orchestration [58.61149924275458]
  Tool use enables large language models to access external information, invoke software systems, and act in digital environments beyond what can be solved from model parameters alone.<n>As agent systems evolve, the central problem has shifted from isolated invocation to multi-tool orchestration over long trajectories with intermediate state, execution feedback, changing environments, and practical constraints such as safety, cost, and verifiability.<n>We organize the literature around six core dimensions: inference-time planning and execution, training and trajectory construction, safety and control, efficiency under resource constraints, capability completeness in open environments, and benchmark design and evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-24T07:05:05Z)
• Agentic Design Patterns: A System-Theoretic Framework [8.108572809924956]
  Existing efforts to agentic design patterns often lack a rigorous systems-theoretic foundation.<n>We propose a novel system-theoretic framework that deconstructs an agentic AI system into five core, interacting functional subsystems.<n>We present a collection of 12 agentic design patterns that offer reusable, structural solutions to recurring problems in agent design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T16:14:08Z)
• Agentic Artificial Intelligence (AI): Architectures, Taxonomies, and Evaluation of Large Language Model Agents [14.448267395835721]
  We propose a unified taxonomy that breaks agents into Perception, Brain, Planning, Action, Tool Use, and Collaboration.<n>We also group the environments in which these agents operate, including digital operating systems, embodied robotics, and other specialized domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T19:51:16Z)
• Monadic Context Engineering [59.95390010097654]
  This paper introduces Monadic Context Engineering (MCE) to provide a formal foundation for agent design.<n>We demonstrate how Monads enable robust composition, how Applicatives provide a principled structure for parallel execution, and crucially, how Monad Transformers allow for the systematic composition of these capabilities.<n>This layered approach enables developers to construct complex, resilient, and efficient AI agents from simple, independently verifiable components.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-27T01:52:06Z)
• Adaptation of Agentic AI [162.63072848575695]
  We unify the rapidly expanding research landscape into a systematic framework that spans both agent adaptations and tool adaptations.<n>We demonstrate that this framework helps clarify the design space of adaptation strategies in agentic AI.<n>We then review the representative approaches in each category, analyze their strengths and limitations, and highlight key open challenges and future opportunities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T08:38:51Z)
• Designing Domain-Specific Agents via Hierarchical Task Abstraction Mechanism [61.01709143437043]
  We introduce a novel agent design framework centered on a Hierarchical Task Abstraction Mechanism (HTAM)<n>Specifically, HTAM moves beyond emulating social roles, instead structuring multi-agent systems into a logical hierarchy that mirrors the intrinsic task-dependency graph of a given domain.<n>We instantiate this framework as EarthAgent, a multi-agent system tailored for complex geospatial analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-21T12:25:47Z)
• Osprey: A Scalable Framework for the Orchestration of Agentic Systems [0.4970364068620607]
  Osprey Framework is a production-ready architecture for scalable agentic systems that integrate conversational context with robust tool orchestration across safety-critical domains.<n>Our framework provides: (i) dynamic capability classification to select only relevant tools; (ii) plan-first orchestration with explicit dependencies and optional human approval; and (iii) context-aware task extraction that combines dialogue history with external memory and domain resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T20:57:13Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems [53.37728204835912]
  Most existing AI systems rely on manually crafted configurations that remain static after deployment.<n>Recent research has explored agent evolution techniques that aim to automatically enhance agent systems based on interaction data and environmental feedback.<n>This survey aims to provide researchers and practitioners with a systematic understanding of self-evolving AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-10T16:07:32Z)
• A Survey on Agent Workflow -- Status and Future [2.817843718857682]
  This survey provides a comprehensive review of agent workflow systems.<n>We classify existing systems along two key dimensions: functional capabilities and architectural features.<n>We highlight common patterns, potential technical challenges, and emerging trends.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-02T04:15:30Z)
• A Survey of Self-Evolving Agents: On Path to Artificial Super Intelligence [87.08051686357206]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities but remain fundamentally static.<n>As LLMs are increasingly deployed in open-ended, interactive environments, this static nature has become a critical bottleneck.<n>This survey provides the first systematic and comprehensive review of self-evolving agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:59:05Z)
• Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents [109.13815627467514]
  The emergence of AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) marks a pivotal shift toward the Agentic Web.<n>In this paradigm, agents interact directly with one another to plan, coordinate, and execute complex tasks on behalf of users.<n>We present a structured framework for understanding and building the Agentic Web.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-28T17:58:12Z)
• Deep Research Agents: A Systematic Examination And Roadmap [79.04813794804377]
  Deep Research (DR) agents are designed to tackle complex, multi-turn informational research tasks.<n>In this paper, we conduct a detailed analysis of the foundational technologies and architectural components that constitute DR agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-22T16:52:48Z)
• An Agentic Framework for Autonomous Metamaterial Modeling and Inverse Design [2.66269503676104]
  We develop and demonstrate a framework specifically for the inverse design of photonic metamaterials.<n>The framework's effectiveness is demonstrated in its ability to automate, reason, plan, and adapt.<n> Notably, the Agentic Framework possesses internal reflection and decision flexibility, permitting highly varied and potentially novel outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-07T22:10:05Z)
• Distinguishing Autonomous AI Agents from Collaborative Agentic Systems: A Comprehensive Framework for Understanding Modern Intelligent Architectures [0.0]
  The emergence of large language models has catalyzed two distinct yet interconnected paradigms in artificial intelligence: standalone AI Agents and collaborative Agentic AI ecosystems.<n>This study establishes a definitive framework for distinguishing these architectures through systematic analysis of their operational principles, structural compositions, and deployment methodologies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T08:52:23Z)
• Internet of Agents: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges [66.44234034282421]
  We introduce the Internet of Agents (IoA) as a foundational framework that enables seamless interconnection, dynamic discovery, and collaborative orchestration among heterogeneous agents at scale.<n>We analyze the key operational enablers of IoA, including capability notification and discovery, adaptive communication protocols, dynamic task matching, consensus and conflict-resolution mechanisms, and incentive models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-12T02:04:37Z)
• Large Language Model Agent: A Survey on Methodology, Applications and Challenges [88.3032929492409]
  Large Language Model (LLM) agents, with goal-driven behaviors and dynamic adaptation capabilities, potentially represent a critical pathway toward artificial general intelligence.<n>This survey systematically deconstructs LLM agent systems through a methodology-centered taxonomy.<n>Our work provides a unified architectural perspective, examining how agents are constructed, how they collaborate, and how they evolve over time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T12:50:17Z)
• AIOpsLab: A Holistic Framework to Evaluate AI Agents for Enabling Autonomous Clouds [12.464941027105306]
  AI for IT Operations (AIOps) aims to automate complex operational tasks, such as fault localization and root cause analysis, to reduce human workload and minimize customer impact.<n>Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) and AI agents are revolutionizing AIOps by enabling end-to-end and multitask automation.<n>We present AIOPSLAB, a framework that deploys microservice cloud environments, injects faults, generates workloads, and exports telemetry data but also orchestrates these components and provides interfaces for interacting with and evaluating agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-12T04:17:39Z)
• Magentic-One: A Generalist Multi-Agent System for Solving Complex Tasks [39.084974125007165]
  We introduce Magentic-One, a high-performing open-source agentic system for solving complex tasks. Magentic-One uses a multi-agent architecture where a lead agent, the Orchestrator, tracks progress, and re-plans to recover from errors. We show that Magentic-One achieves statistically competitive performance to the state-of-the-art on three diverse and challenging agentic benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T06:36:19Z)
• Internet of Agents: Weaving a Web of Heterogeneous Agents for Collaborative Intelligence [79.5316642687565]
  Existing multi-agent frameworks often struggle with integrating diverse capable third-party agents. We propose the Internet of Agents (IoA), a novel framework that addresses these limitations. IoA introduces an agent integration protocol, an instant-messaging-like architecture design, and dynamic mechanisms for agent teaming and conversation flow control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T17:33:24Z)
• The Landscape of Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A Survey [0.0]
  This paper examines the recent advancements in AI agent implementations. It focuses on their ability to achieve complex goals that require enhanced reasoning, planning, and tool execution capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T17:32:41Z)
• AgentStudio: A Toolkit for Building General Virtual Agents [57.02375267926862]
  General virtual agents need to handle multimodal observations, master complex action spaces, and self-improve in dynamic, open-domain environments.<n>AgentStudio provides a lightweight, interactive environment with highly generic observation and action spaces.<n>It integrates tools for creating online benchmark tasks, annotating GUI elements, and labeling actions in videos.<n>Based on our environment and tools, we curate an online task suite that benchmarks both GUI interactions and function calling with efficient auto-evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T17:54:15Z)
• AgentScope: A Flexible yet Robust Multi-Agent Platform [66.64116117163755]
  AgentScope is a developer-centric multi-agent platform with message exchange as its core communication mechanism. The abundant syntactic tools, built-in agents and service functions, user-friendly interfaces for application demonstration and utility monitor, zero-code programming workstation, and automatic prompt tuning mechanism significantly lower the barriers to both development and deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T04:11:28Z)
• Towards Responsible Generative AI: A Reference Architecture for Designing Foundation Model based Agents [28.406492378232695]
  Foundation model based agents derive their autonomy from the capabilities of foundation models. This paper presents a pattern-oriented reference architecture that serves as guidance when designing foundation model based agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T04:21:47Z)
• Tool interoperability for model-based systems engineering [0.7182467727359453]
  We discuss several tools, each state-of-the-art in its own discipline, offering functionality such as specification, synthesis, and verification. We present Analytics as a Service, built on the Arrowhead framework, to connect these tools and make them interoperable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-07T14:45:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.