Comparative sentiment analysis of public perception: Monkeypox vs. COVID-19 behavioral insights
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07430v2
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2025 10:54:37 GMT
- Title: Comparative sentiment analysis of public perception: Monkeypox vs. COVID-19 behavioral insights
- Authors: Mostafa Mohaimen Akand Faisal, Rabeya Amin Jhuma, Jamini Jasim,
- Abstract summary: This study conducts a comparative sentiment analysis of public perceptions surrounding COVID-19 and mpox by leveraging extensive datasets of 147,475 and 106,638 tweets, respectively.<n>The analysis highlights significant differences in public sentiment driven by disease characteristics, media representation, and pandemic fatigue.<n>Through the lens of sentiment polarity and thematic trends, this study offers valuable insights into tailoring public health messaging, mitigating misinformation, and fostering trust during concurrent health crises.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The emergence of global health crises, such as COVID-19 and Monkeypox (mpox), has underscored the importance of understanding public sentiment to inform effective public health strategies. This study conducts a comparative sentiment analysis of public perceptions surrounding COVID-19 and mpox by leveraging extensive datasets of 147,475 and 106,638 tweets, respectively. Advanced machine learning models, including Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, RoBERTa, DistilRoBERTa and XLNet, were applied to perform sentiment classification, with results indicating key trends in public emotion and discourse. The analysis highlights significant differences in public sentiment driven by disease characteristics, media representation, and pandemic fatigue. Through the lens of sentiment polarity and thematic trends, this study offers valuable insights into tailoring public health messaging, mitigating misinformation, and fostering trust during concurrent health crises. The findings contribute to advancing sentiment analysis applications in public health informatics, setting the groundwork for enhanced real-time monitoring and multilingual analysis in future research.
Related papers
- Large language models for newspaper sentiment analysis during COVID-19: The Guardian [0.16777183511743468]
This study provides a sentiment analysis of The Guardian newspaper during various stages of COVID-19.<n>During the early pandemic stages, public sentiment prioritised urgent crisis response, later shifting focus to addressing the impact on health and the economy.<n>Results indicate that during the early pandemic stages, public sentiment prioritised urgent crisis response, later shifting focus to addressing the impact on health and the economy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-20T07:10:52Z) - Do we listen to what we are told? An empirical study on human behaviour
during the COVID-19 pandemic: neural networks vs. regression analysis [7.134828408572364]
We study how compliant a general population is to mask-wearing-related public-health policy during the COVID-19 pandemic.
We find that mask-wearing-related government regulations and public-transport announcements encouraged correct mask-wearing-behaviours.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-21T23:14:47Z) - Decoding Susceptibility: Modeling Misbelief to Misinformation Through a Computational Approach [61.04606493712002]
Susceptibility to misinformation describes the degree of belief in unverifiable claims that is not observable.
Existing susceptibility studies heavily rely on self-reported beliefs.
We propose a computational approach to model users' latent susceptibility levels.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-16T07:22:56Z) - Measuring the Effect of Influential Messages on Varying Personas [67.1149173905004]
We present a new task, Response Forecasting on Personas for News Media, to estimate the response a persona might have upon seeing a news message.
The proposed task not only introduces personalization in the modeling but also predicts the sentiment polarity and intensity of each response.
This enables more accurate and comprehensive inference on the mental state of the persona.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-25T21:01:00Z) - Exploring Social Media for Early Detection of Depression in COVID-19
Patients [44.76299288962596]
Detection and intervention at an early stage can reduce the risk of depression in COVID-19 patients.
We managed a dataset of COVID-19 patients that contains information about their social media activity both before and after infection.
We conducted an extensive analysis of this dataset to investigate the characteristic of COVID-19 patients with a higher risk of depression.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-23T14:13:52Z) - Coronavirus statistics causes emotional bias: a social media text mining
perspective [4.042350304426975]
This paper proposes a deep learning model which classifies texts related to the pandemic from text data with place labels.
Next, it conducts a sentiment analysis based on multi-task learning.
Finally, it carries out a fixed-effect panel regression with outputs of the sentiment analysis.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-16T03:36:13Z) - COVID-19 Outbreak Prediction and Analysis using Self Reported Symptoms [12.864257751458712]
We use self-reported symptoms survey data to understand trends in the spread of COVID-19.
From our studies, we try to predict the likely % of the population that tested positive for COVID-19 based on self-reported symptoms.
We forecast that % of the population having COVID-19-like illness (CLI) and those tested positive as 0.15% and 1.14% absolute error respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-21T00:37:24Z) - Public risk perception and emotion on Twitter during the Covid-19
pandemic [0.0]
Natural language analysis of this text enables near-to-real-time monitoring of indicators of public risk perception.
We compare epidemiological indicators of the progression of the pandemic with indicators of the public perception of the pandemic constructed from 20 million unique Covid-19-related tweets.
We find evidence of psychophysical numbing: Twitter users increasingly fixate on mortality, but in a decreasingly emotional and increasingly analytic tone.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-03T13:09:45Z) - Understanding the temporal evolution of COVID-19 research through
machine learning and natural language processing [66.63200823918429]
The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been continuously affecting human lives and communities around the world.
We used multiple data sources, i.e., PubMed and ArXiv, and built several machine learning models to characterize the landscape of current COVID-19 research.
Our findings confirm the types of research available in PubMed and ArXiv differ significantly, with the former exhibiting greater diversity in terms of COVID-19 related issues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-22T18:02:39Z) - Analyzing COVID-19 on Online Social Media: Trends, Sentiments and
Emotions [44.92240076313168]
We analyze the affective trajectories of the American people and the Chinese people based on Twitter and Weibo posts between January 20th, 2020 and May 11th 2020.
By contrasting two very different countries, China and the Unites States, we reveal sharp differences in people's views on COVID-19 in different cultures.
Our study provides a computational approach to unveiling public emotions and concerns on the pandemic in real-time, which would potentially help policy-makers better understand people's need and thus make optimal policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-29T09:24:38Z) - COVI White Paper [67.04578448931741]
Contact tracing is an essential tool to change the course of the Covid-19 pandemic.
We present an overview of the rationale, design, ethical considerations and privacy strategy of COVI,' a Covid-19 public peer-to-peer contact tracing and risk awareness mobile application developed in Canada.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-18T07:40:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.