RobustSpring: Benchmarking Robustness to Image Corruptions for Optical Flow, Scene Flow and Stereo

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.09368v1
• Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 13:21:34 GMT
• Title: RobustSpring: Benchmarking Robustness to Image Corruptions for Optical Flow, Scene Flow and Stereo
• Authors: Jenny Schmalfuss, Victor Oei, Lukas Mehl, Madlen Bartsch, Shashank Agnihotri, Margret Keuper, Andrés Bruhn,
• Abstract summary: We present RobustSpring, a dataset and benchmark for evaluating robustness to image corruptions for optical flow, scene flow, and stereo models.<n> RobustSpring applies 20 different image corruptions, including noise, blur, color changes, quality degradations, and weather distortions, in a time-, stereo-, and depth-consistent manner.<n>We benchmark a curated selection of initial models, observing that accurate models are not necessarily robust and that robustness varies widely by corruption type.
• Score: 12.718780414062167
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Standard benchmarks for optical flow, scene flow, and stereo vision algorithms generally focus on model accuracy rather than robustness to image corruptions like noise or rain. Hence, the resilience of models to such real-world perturbations is largely unquantified. To address this, we present RobustSpring, a comprehensive dataset and benchmark for evaluating robustness to image corruptions for optical flow, scene flow, and stereo models. RobustSpring applies 20 different image corruptions, including noise, blur, color changes, quality degradations, and weather distortions, in a time-, stereo-, and depth-consistent manner to the high-resolution Spring dataset, creating a suite of 20,000 corrupted images that reflect challenging conditions. RobustSpring enables comparisons of model robustness via a new corruption robustness metric. Integration with the Spring benchmark enables public two-axis evaluations of both accuracy and robustness. We benchmark a curated selection of initial models, observing that accurate models are not necessarily robust and that robustness varies widely by corruption type. RobustSpring is a new computer vision benchmark that treats robustness as a first-class citizen to foster models that combine accuracy with resilience. It will be available at https://spring-benchmark.org.

Related papers

• Examining the Impact of Optical Aberrations to Image Classification and Object Detection Models [58.98742597810023]
  Vision models have to behave in a robust way to disturbances such as noise or blur.<n>This paper studies two datasets of blur corruptions, which we denote OpticsBench and LensCorruptions.<n> Evaluations for image classification and object detection on ImageNet and MSCOCO show that for a variety of different pre-trained models, the performance on OpticsBench and LensCorruptions varies significantly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-25T17:23:47Z)
• Benchmarking the Robustness of Optical Flow Estimation to Corruptions [25.789811424859554]
  We introduce 7 temporal corruptions specifically designed for the benchmarking of optical flow models. Two robustness benchmarks, KITTI-FC and GoPro-FC, are established as the first corruption benchmark for optical flow estimation. 29 model variants from 15 optical flow methods are evaluated, yielding 10 intriguing observations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-22T11:31:01Z)
• ImageNet-D: Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness on Diffusion Synthetic Object [78.58860252442045]
  We introduce generative model as a data source for hard images that benchmark deep models' robustness. We are able to generate images with more diversified backgrounds, textures, and materials than any prior work, where we term this benchmark as ImageNet-D. Our work suggests that diffusion models can be an effective source to test vision models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T17:23:39Z)
• Robo3D: Towards Robust and Reliable 3D Perception against Corruptions [58.306694836881235]
  We present Robo3D, the first comprehensive benchmark heading toward probing the robustness of 3D detectors and segmentors under out-of-distribution scenarios. We consider eight corruption types stemming from severe weather conditions, external disturbances, and internal sensor failure. We propose a density-insensitive training framework along with a simple flexible voxelization strategy to enhance the model resiliency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-30T17:59:17Z)
• Robust Single Image Dehazing Based on Consistent and Contrast-Assisted Reconstruction [95.5735805072852]
  We propose a novel density-variational learning framework to improve the robustness of the image dehzing model. Specifically, the dehazing network is optimized under the consistency-regularized framework. Our method significantly surpasses the state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-29T08:11:04Z)
• Benchmarking the Robustness of Spatial-Temporal Models Against Corruptions [32.821121530785504]
  We establish a corruption robustness benchmark, Mini Kinetics-C and Mini SSV2-C, which considers temporal corruptions beyond spatial corruptions in images. We make the first attempt to conduct an exhaustive study on the corruption robustness of established CNN-based and Transformer-based spatial-temporal models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T05:59:39Z)
• Improving robustness against common corruptions with frequency biased models [112.65717928060195]
  unseen image corruptions can cause a surprisingly large drop in performance. Image corruption types have different characteristics in the frequency spectrum and would benefit from a targeted type of data augmentation. We propose a new regularization scheme that minimizes the total variation (TV) of convolution feature-maps to increase high-frequency robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-30T10:44:50Z)
• RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmark [84.50044645539305]
  Key challenge in benchmarking robustness is that its evaluation is often error-prone leading to robustness overestimation. We evaluate adversarial robustness with AutoAttack, an ensemble of white- and black-box attacks. We analyze the impact of robustness on the performance on distribution shifts, calibration, out-of-distribution detection, fairness, privacy leakage, smoothness, and transferability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T17:06:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.