Do different prompting methods yield a common task representation in language models?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12075v2
• Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 22:58:38 GMT
• Title: Do different prompting methods yield a common task representation in language models?
• Authors: Guy Davidson, Todd M. Gureckis, Brenden M. Lake, Adina Williams,
• Abstract summary: Demonstrations and instructions are two primary approaches for prompting language models to perform in-context learning tasks.<n>We study this through textitfunction vectors (FVs), recently proposed as a mechanism to extract few-shot ICL task representations.<n>We find evidence that demonstration- and instruction-based function vectors leverage different model components, and offer several controls to dissociate their contributions to task performance.
• Score: 22.71314612690917
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Demonstrations and instructions are two primary approaches for prompting language models to perform in-context learning (ICL) tasks. Do identical tasks elicited in different ways result in similar representations of the task? An improved understanding of task representation mechanisms would offer interpretability insights and may aid in steering models. We study this through \textit{function vectors} (FVs), recently proposed as a mechanism to extract few-shot ICL task representations. We generalize FVs to alternative task presentations, focusing on short textual instruction prompts, and successfully extract instruction function vectors that promote zero-shot task accuracy. We find evidence that demonstration- and instruction-based function vectors leverage different model components, and offer several controls to dissociate their contributions to task performance. Our results suggest that different task promptings forms do not induce a common task representation through FVs but elicit different, partly overlapping mechanisms. Our findings offer principled support to the practice of combining instructions and task demonstrations, imply challenges in universally monitoring task inference across presentation forms, and encourage further examinations of LLM task inference mechanisms.

Related papers

• A Cooperative Multi-Agent Framework for Zero-Shot Named Entity Recognition [71.61103962200666]
  Zero-shot named entity recognition (NER) aims to develop entity recognition systems from unannotated text corpora.<n>Recent work has adapted large language models (LLMs) for zero-shot NER by crafting specialized prompt templates.<n>We introduce the cooperative multi-agent system (CMAS), a novel framework for zero-shot NER.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T23:30:43Z)
• The Geometry of Prompting: Unveiling Distinct Mechanisms of Task Adaptation in Language Models [40.128112851978116]
  We study how different prompting methods affect the geometry of representations in language models.<n>Our analysis highlights the critical role of input distribution samples and label semantics in few-shot in-context learning.<n>Our work contributes to the theoretical understanding of large language models and lays the groundwork for developing more effective, representation-aware prompting strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-11T23:09:50Z)
• Learning Task Representations from In-Context Learning [73.72066284711462]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable proficiency in in-context learning.<n>We introduce an automated formulation for encoding task information in ICL prompts as a function of attention heads.<n>We show that our method's effectiveness stems from aligning the distribution of the last hidden state with that of an optimally performing in-context-learned model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-08T00:16:44Z)
• Vision-Language Models Create Cross-Modal Task Representations [58.19152818504624]
  We find that vision-language models (VLMs) can align conceptually equivalent inputs into a shared task vector.<n>We measure this alignment via cross-modal transfer on a range of tasks and model architectures.<n>We show that task vectors can be transferred from a base language model to its fine-tuned vision-language counterpart.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-29T17:59:45Z)
• TEGEE: Task dEfinition Guided Expert Ensembling for Generalizable and Few-shot Learning [37.09785060896196]
  We propose textbfTEGEE (Task Definition Guided Expert Ensembling), a method that explicitly extracts task definitions.<n>Our framework employs a dual 3B model approach, with each model assigned a distinct role.<n> Empirical evaluations show that TEGEE performs comparably to the larger LLaMA2-13B model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T05:26:41Z)
• Identifying and Analyzing Performance-Critical Tokens in Large Language Models [52.404072802235234]
  We study how large language models learn to perform tasks from demonstrations.<n>Our work sheds light on how large language models learn to perform tasks from demonstrations and deepens our understanding of the roles different types of tokens play in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-20T20:55:21Z)
• Multitask Multimodal Prompted Training for Interactive Embodied Task Completion [48.69347134411864]
  Embodied MultiModal Agent (EMMA) is a unified encoder-decoder model that reasons over images and trajectories. By unifying all tasks as text generation, EMMA learns a language of actions which facilitates transfer across tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T15:27:52Z)
• UniverSLU: Universal Spoken Language Understanding for Diverse Tasks with Natural Language Instructions [64.50935101415776]
  We build a single model that jointly performs various spoken language understanding (SLU) tasks. We demonstrate the efficacy of our single multi-task learning model "UniverSLU" for 12 speech classification and sequence generation task types spanning 17 datasets and 9 languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T17:10:23Z)
• Musketeer: Joint Training for Multi-task Vision Language Model with Task Explanation Prompts [75.75548749888029]
  We present a vision-language model whose parameters are jointly trained on all tasks and fully shared among multiple heterogeneous tasks. With a single model, Musketeer achieves results comparable to or better than strong baselines trained on single tasks, almost uniformly across multiple tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-11T17:57:49Z)
• Robustness of Learning from Task Instructions [15.462970803323563]
  Traditional supervised learning mostly works on individual tasks and requires training on a large set of task-specific examples. To build a system that can quickly and easily generalize to new tasks, task instructions have been adopted as an emerging trend of supervision. This work investigates the system robustness when the instructions of new tasks are (i) manipulated, (ii) paraphrased, or (iii) from different levels of conciseness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-07T17:54:59Z)
• Compressed Hierarchical Representations for Multi-Task Learning and Task Clustering [5.878411350387833]
  We frame homogeneous-feature multi-task learning as a hierarchical representation learning problem. We assume an additive independent noise model between the task-agnostic and task-specific latent representations. It is shown that our resulting representations yield competitive performance for several MTL benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T15:31:17Z)
• Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work? [112.72413411257662]
  Large language models (LMs) are able to in-context learn by conditioning on a few input-label pairs (demonstrations) and making predictions for new inputs. We show that ground truth demonstrations are in fact not required -- randomly replacing labels in the demonstrations barely hurts performance. We find that other aspects of the demonstrations are the key drivers of end task performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T17:25:19Z)
• CINS: Comprehensive Instruction for Few-shot Learning in Task-oriented Dialog Systems [56.302581679816775]
  This paper proposes Comprehensive Instruction (CINS) that exploits PLMs with task-specific instructions. We design a schema (definition, constraint, prompt) of instructions and their customized realizations for three important downstream tasks in ToD. Experiments are conducted on these ToD tasks in realistic few-shot learning scenarios with small validation data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-10T03:23:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.