Unlabeled Data or Pre-trained Model: Rethinking Semi-Supervised Learning and Pretrain-Finetuning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.13317v3
• Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 02:23:40 GMT
• Title: Unlabeled Data or Pre-trained Model: Rethinking Semi-Supervised Learning and Pretrain-Finetuning
• Authors: Song-Lin Lv, Rui Zhu, Yu-Feng Li, Lan-Zhe Guo,
• Abstract summary: Semi-supervised learning (SSL) alleviates the cost of data labeling process by exploiting unlabeled data.<n>Pretrain-Finetuning paradigm has garnered significant attention in recent years.<n>We propose textitFew-shot SSL -- a framework that enables fair comparison between these two paradigms.
• Score: 47.18766077898836
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Semi-supervised learning (SSL) alleviates the cost of data labeling process by exploiting unlabeled data, and has achieved promising results on various tasks such as image classification. Meanwhile, the Pretrain-Finetuning paradigm has garnered significant attention in recent years, and exploiting pre-trained models could also reduce the requirement of labeled data in downstream tasks. Therefore, a question naturally occurs: \emph{When the labeled data is scarce in the target tasks, should we exploit unlabeled data or pre-trained models?} To answer this question, we select pre-trained Vision-Language Models (VLMs) as representative pretrain-finetuning instances and propose \textit{Few-shot SSL} -- a framework that enables fair comparison between these two paradigms by controlling the amount of labeled data used. Extensive experiments across various settings demonstrate that pre-trained VLMs generally outperform SSL methods in nearly all cases, except when the data has low resolution or lacks clear semantic structure. Therefore, we encourage future SSL research to compare with pre-trained models and explore deeper integration, such as using pre-trained knowledge to enhance pseudo-labeling. To support future research, we release our unified reproduction and evaluation framework. Codes are available \href{https://anonymous.4open.science/r/Rethinking-SSL-and-Pretrain-Finetuning-5566 }{here}.

Related papers

• FATE: A Prompt-Tuning-Based Semi-Supervised Learning Framework for Extremely Limited Labeled Data [36.21759320898034]
  Semi-supervised learning (SSL) has achieved significant progress by leveraging both labeled data and unlabeled data.<n>We propose Firstly Adapt, Then catEgorize (FATE), a novel SSL framework tailored for scenarios with extremely limited labeled data.<n>FATE exploits unlabeled data to compensate for scarce supervision signals, then transfers to downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T02:54:28Z)
• Revisiting semi-supervised learning in the era of foundation models [28.414667991336067]
  Semi-supervised learning (SSL) leverages abundant unlabeled data alongside limited labeled data to enhance learning.<n>We develop new SSL benchmark datasets where frozen vision foundation models (VFMs) underperform and systematically evaluate representative SSL methods.<n>We make a surprising observation: parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) using only labeled data often matches SSL performance, even without leveraging unlabeled data.<n>To overcome the notorious issue of noisy pseudo-labels, we propose ensembling multiple PEFT approaches and VFM backbones to produce more robust pseudo-labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T18:01:10Z)
• A Closer Look at Benchmarking Self-Supervised Pre-training with Image Classification [51.35500308126506]
  Self-supervised learning (SSL) is a machine learning approach where the data itself provides supervision, eliminating the need for external labels. We study how classification-based evaluation protocols for SSL correlate and how well they predict downstream performance on different dataset types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T23:17:36Z)
• Self-supervised learning for skin cancer diagnosis with limited training data [0.196629787330046]
  Self-supervised learning (SSL) is an alternative to the standard supervised pre-training on ImageNet for scenarios with limited training data. We consider textitfurther SSL pre-training on task-specific datasets, where our implementation is motivated by supervised transfer learning. We find minimal further SSL pre-training on task-specific data can be as effective as large-scale SSL pre-training on ImageNet for medical image classification tasks with limited labelled data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-01T08:11:38Z)
• Progressive Feature Adjustment for Semi-supervised Learning from Pretrained Models [39.42802115580677]
  Semi-supervised learning (SSL) can leverage both labeled and unlabeled data to build a predictive model. Recent literature suggests that naively applying state-of-the-art SSL with a pretrained model fails to unleash the full potential of training data. We propose to use pseudo-labels from the unlabelled data to update the feature extractor that is less sensitive to incorrect labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-09T01:57:14Z)
• DATA: Domain-Aware and Task-Aware Pre-training [94.62676913928831]
  We present DATA, a simple yet effective NAS approach specialized for self-supervised learning (SSL) Our method achieves promising results across a wide range of computation costs on downstream tasks, including image classification, object detection and semantic segmentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T02:38:49Z)
• Few-shot Learning via Dependency Maximization and Instance Discriminant Analysis [21.8311401851523]
  We study the few-shot learning problem, where a model learns to recognize new objects with extremely few labeled data per category. We propose a simple approach to exploit unlabeled data accompanying the few-shot task for improving few-shot performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-07T02:19:01Z)
• Dash: Semi-Supervised Learning with Dynamic Thresholding [72.74339790209531]
  We propose a semi-supervised learning (SSL) approach that uses unlabeled examples to train models. Our proposed approach, Dash, enjoys its adaptivity in terms of unlabeled data selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-01T23:52:29Z)
• Trash to Treasure: Harvesting OOD Data with Cross-Modal Matching for Open-Set Semi-Supervised Learning [101.28281124670647]
  Open-set semi-supervised learning (open-set SSL) investigates a challenging but practical scenario where out-of-distribution (OOD) samples are contained in the unlabeled data. We propose a novel training mechanism that could effectively exploit the presence of OOD data for enhanced feature learning. Our approach substantially lifts the performance on open-set SSL and outperforms the state-of-the-art by a large margin.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-12T09:14:44Z)
• Self-Tuning for Data-Efficient Deep Learning [75.34320911480008]
  Self-Tuning is a novel approach to enable data-efficient deep learning. It unifies the exploration of labeled and unlabeled data and the transfer of a pre-trained model. It outperforms its SSL and TL counterparts on five tasks by sharp margins.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-25T14:56:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.