How Managers Perceive AI-Assisted Conversational Training for Workplace Communication

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14452v2
• Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 16:59:56 GMT
• Title: How Managers Perceive AI-Assisted Conversational Training for Workplace Communication
• Authors: Lance T. Wilhelm, Xiaohan Ding, Kirk McInnis Knutsen, Buse Carik, Eugenia H. Rho,
• Abstract summary: This study investigates how managers envision the role of AI in helping them improve their communication skills.<n>We designed a conversational role-play system, CommCoach, as a functional probe to understand how managers anticipate using AI to practice their communication skills.
• Score: 6.329725088805596
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Effective workplace communication is essential for managerial success, yet many managers lack access to tailored and sustained training. Although AI-assisted communication systems may offer scalable training solutions, little is known about how managers envision the role of AI in helping them improve their communication skills. To investigate this, we designed a conversational role-play system, CommCoach, as a functional probe to understand how managers anticipate using AI to practice their communication skills. Through semi-structured interviews, participants emphasized the value of adaptive, low-risk simulations for practicing difficult workplace conversations. They also highlighted opportunities, including human-AI teaming, transparent and context-aware feedback, and greater control over AI-generated personas. AI-assisted communication training should balance personalization, structured learning objectives, and adaptability to different user styles and contexts. However, achieving this requires carefully navigating tensions between adaptive and consistent AI feedback, realism and potential bias, and the open-ended nature of AI conversations versus structured workplace discourse.

Related papers

• Exploring Big Five Personality and AI Capability Effects in LLM-Simulated Negotiation Dialogues [16.07828032939124]
  This paper presents an evaluation framework for agentic AI systems in mission-critical negotiation contexts.<n>Using Sotopia as a simulation testbed, we present two experiments that systematically evaluated how personality traits and AI agent characteristics influence social negotiation outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-19T00:14:56Z)
• Human-Centered AI Communication in Co-Creativity: An Initial Framework and Insights [2.3020018305241337]
  This paper presents the initial design of the Framework for AI Communication (FAICO) for co-creative AI.<n>FAICO presents key aspects of AI communication and their impact on user experience, offering preliminary guidelines for designing human-centered AI communication.<n>Our findings reveal a preference for a human-AI feedback loop over linear communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T21:19:37Z)
• Conversational AI as a Coding Assistant: Understanding Programmers' Interactions with and Expectations from Large Language Models for Coding [5.064404027153094]
  Conversational AI interfaces powered by large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used as coding assistants.<n>This study investigates programmers' usage patterns, perceptions, and interaction strategies when engaging with LLM-driven coding assistants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T15:06:07Z)
• Challenges in Human-Agent Communication [55.53932430345333]
  We identify and analyze twelve key communication challenges that these systems pose.<n>These include challenges in conveying information from the agent to the user, challenges in enabling the user to convey information to the agent, and overarching challenges that need to be considered across all human-agent communication.<n>Our findings serve as an urgent call for new design patterns, principles, and guidelines to support transparency and control in these systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-28T01:21:26Z)
• Interactive Dialogue Agents via Reinforcement Learning on Hindsight Regenerations [58.65755268815283]
  Many real dialogues are interactive, meaning an agent's utterances will influence their conversational partner, elicit information, or change their opinion. We use this fact to rewrite and augment existing suboptimal data, and train via offline reinforcement learning (RL) an agent that outperforms both prompting and learning from unaltered human demonstrations. Our results in a user study with real humans show that our approach greatly outperforms existing state-of-the-art dialogue agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T21:37:51Z)
• GOMA: Proactive Embodied Cooperative Communication via Goal-Oriented Mental Alignment [72.96949760114575]
  We propose a novel cooperative communication framework, Goal-Oriented Mental Alignment (GOMA)<n>GOMA formulates verbal communication as a planning problem that minimizes the misalignment between parts of agents' mental states that are relevant to the goals.<n>We evaluate our approach against strong baselines in two challenging environments, Overcooked (a multiplayer game) and VirtualHome (a household simulator)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-17T03:52:52Z)
• Will 6G be Semantic Communications? Opportunities and Challenges from Task Oriented and Secure Communications to Integrated Sensing [49.83882366499547]
  This paper explores opportunities and challenges of task (goal)-oriented and semantic communications for next-generation (NextG) networks through the integration of multi-task learning. We employ deep neural networks representing a dedicated encoder at the transmitter and multiple task-specific decoders at the receiver. We scrutinize potential vulnerabilities stemming from adversarial attacks during both training and testing phases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T04:01:20Z)
• Progressively Efficient Learning [58.6490456517954]
  We develop a novel learning framework named Communication-Efficient Interactive Learning (CEIL) CEIL leads to emergence of a human-like pattern where the learner and the teacher communicate efficiently by exchanging increasingly more abstract intentions. Agents trained with CEIL quickly master new tasks, outperforming non-hierarchical and hierarchical imitation learning by up to 50% and 20% in absolute success rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T07:52:04Z)
• From Text to Self: Users' Perceptions of Potential of AI on Interpersonal Communication and Self [18.298794560324588]
  We conducted a one-week diary and interview study to explore users' perceptions of AI-mediated communication (AIMC) tools. Our findings indicate that participants view AIMC support favorably, citing benefits such as increased communication confidence. However, the study also uncovers current limitations of AIMC tools, including verbosity, unnatural responses, and excessive emotional intensity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-06T02:19:10Z)
• Improving Grounded Language Understanding in a Collaborative Environment by Interacting with Agents Through Help Feedback [42.19685958922537]
  We argue that human-AI collaboration should be interactive, with humans monitoring the work of AI agents and providing feedback that the agent can understand and utilize. In this work, we explore these directions using the challenging task defined by the IGLU competition, an interactive grounded language understanding task in a MineCraft-like world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-21T05:37:59Z)
• Over-communicate no more: Situated RL agents learn concise communication protocols [78.28898217947467]
  It is unclear how to design artificial agents that can learn to effectively and efficiently communicate with each other. Much research on communication emergence uses reinforcement learning (RL) We explore situated communication in a multi-step task, where the acting agent has to forgo an environmental action to communicate. We find that while all tested pressures can disincentivise over-communication, situated communication does it most effectively and, unlike the cost on effort, does not negatively impact emergence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-02T21:08:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.