Do LLMs Need to Think in One Language? Correlation between Latent Language and Task Performance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.21458v1
• Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 17:30:57 GMT
• Title: Do LLMs Need to Think in One Language? Correlation between Latent Language and Task Performance
• Authors: Shintaro Ozaki, Tatsuya Hiraoka, Hiroto Otake, Hiroki Ouchi, Masaru Isonuma, Benjamin Heinzerling, Kentaro Inui, Taro Watanabe, Yusuke Miyao, Yohei Oseki, Yu Takagi,
• Abstract summary: We study how the discrepancy between the latent language and the input and output language affects downstream task performance.<n>Our work varies the input prompt languages across multiple downstream tasks and analyzes the correlation between consistency in latent language and task performance.<n> Experimental results indicate that maintaining consistency in latent language is not always necessary for optimal downstream task performance.
• Score: 38.785363522684385
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are known to process information using a proficient internal language consistently, referred to as latent language, which may differ from the input or output languages. However, how the discrepancy between the latent language and the input and output language affects downstream task performance remains largely unexplored. While many studies research the latent language of LLMs, few address its importance in influencing task performance. In our study, we hypothesize that thinking in latent language consistently enhances downstream task performance. To validate this, our work varies the input prompt languages across multiple downstream tasks and analyzes the correlation between consistency in latent language and task performance. We create datasets consisting of questions from diverse domains such as translation and geo-culture, which are influenced by the choice of latent language. Experimental results across multiple LLMs on translation and geo-culture tasks, which are sensitive to the choice of language, indicate that maintaining consistency in latent language is not always necessary for optimal downstream task performance. This is because these models adapt their internal representations near the final layers to match the target language, reducing the impact of consistency on overall performance.

Related papers

• Language Surgery in Multilingual Large Language Models [32.77326546076424]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable generalization capabilities across tasks and languages.<n>This paper investigates the naturally emerging representation alignment in LLMs, particularly in the middle layers.<n>We propose Inference-Time Language Control (ITLC) to enable precise cross-lingual language control and mitigate language confusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-14T11:09:50Z)
• Language Matters: How Do Multilingual Input and Reasoning Paths Affect Large Reasoning Models? [59.970391602080205]
  Despite multilingual training, LRMs tend to default to reasoning in high-resource languages at test time.<n>Cultural reasoning degrades performance on reasoning tasks but benefits cultural tasks, while safety evaluations exhibit language-specific behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T02:46:18Z)
• Language Mixing in Reasoning Language Models: Patterns, Impact, and Internal Causes [49.770097731093216]
  Reasoning language models (RLMs) excel at complex tasks by leveraging a chain-of-thought process to generate structured intermediate steps.<n> Language mixing, i.e., reasoning steps containing tokens from languages other than the prompt, has been observed in their outputs and shown to affect performance.<n>We present the first systematic study of language mixing in RLMs, examining its patterns, impact, and internal causes across 15 languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T18:26:53Z)
• Lost in Multilinguality: Dissecting Cross-lingual Factual Inconsistency in Transformer Language Models [49.16690802656554]
  We find that Multilingual factual models struggle to provide consistent responses to semantically equivalent prompts in different languages.<n>We propose a linear shortcut method that bypasses computations in the final layers, enhancing both prediction accuracy and cross-lingual consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T19:43:10Z)
• CoCo-CoLa: Evaluating Language Adherence in Multilingual LLMs [1.2057938662974816]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) develop cross-lingual abilities despite being trained on limited parallel data.<n>We introduce CoCo-CoLa, a novel metric to evaluate language adherence in multilingual LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-18T03:03:53Z)
• Beyond English: The Impact of Prompt Translation Strategies across Languages and Tasks in Multilingual LLMs [13.458891794688551]
  We evaluate pre-translation strategies across 35 languages covering both low and high-resource languages.<n>Our experiments show the impact of factors as similarity to English, translation quality and the size of pre-trained data, on the model performance with pre-translation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T13:49:30Z)
• Is Translation All You Need? A Study on Solving Multilingual Tasks with Large Language Models [79.46179534911019]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated multilingual capabilities, yet they are mostly English-centric due to imbalanced training corpora.<n>We extend the evaluation to real-world user queries and non-English-centric LLMs, offering a broader examination of multilingual performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T12:47:39Z)
• How do Large Language Models Handle Multilingualism? [81.15060972112563]
  This study explores how large language models (LLMs) handle multilingualism. LLMs initially understand the query, converting multilingual inputs into English for task-solving. In the intermediate layers, they employ English for thinking and incorporate multilingual knowledge with self-attention and feed-forward structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T02:55:26Z)
• GradSim: Gradient-Based Language Grouping for Effective Multilingual Training [13.730907708289331]
  We propose GradSim, a language grouping method based on gradient similarity. Our experiments on three diverse multilingual benchmark datasets show that it leads to the largest performance gains. Besides linguistic features, the topics of the datasets play an important role for language grouping.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T18:13:37Z)
• Multilingual Large Language Models Are Not (Yet) Code-Switchers [41.47534626749588]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently shown great capabilities in a wide range of tasks. The practice of alternating languages within an utterance remains relatively uncharted. We argue that current "multilingualism" in LLMs does not inherently imply proficiency with code-switching texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:50:48Z)
• FILTER: An Enhanced Fusion Method for Cross-lingual Language Understanding [85.29270319872597]
  We propose an enhanced fusion method that takes cross-lingual data as input for XLM finetuning. During inference, the model makes predictions based on the text input in the target language and its translation in the source language. To tackle this issue, we propose an additional KL-divergence self-teaching loss for model training, based on auto-generated soft pseudo-labels for translated text in the target language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-10T22:42:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.