Learning to Rank Chain-of-Thought: Using a Small Model

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14999v3
• Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 18:50:37 GMT
• Title: Learning to Rank Chain-of-Thought: Using a Small Model
• Authors: Eric Hanchen Jiang, Haozheng Luo, Shengyuan Pang, Xiaomin Li, Zhenting Qi, Hengli Li, Cheng-Fu Yang, Zongyu Lin, Xinfeng Li, Hao Xu, Kai-Wei Chang, Ying Nian Wu,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces the Energy Outcome Reward Model (EORM), a highly efficient, lightweight verifier designed to address this challenge.<n>EORM uses an energy-based framework to rank Chain-of-Thought (CoT) solutions, learning to distinguish correct from incorrect reasoning using only simple outcome labels.<n>With only 55M parameters, over 127 times smaller than typical reward models, EORM boosts the accuracy of Llama 3 8B to 90.7% on GSM8k and 63.7% on MATH.
• Score: 77.75522308463667
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle with reliable mathematical reasoning, and current verification methods are often computationally expensive. This paper introduces the Energy Outcome Reward Model (EORM), a highly efficient, lightweight post-hoc verifier designed to address this challenge. EORM uses an energy-based framework to rank Chain-of-Thought (CoT) solutions, learning to distinguish correct from incorrect reasoning using only simple outcome labels, thus eliminating the need for expensive annotations. With only 55M parameters, over 127 times smaller than typical reward models, EORM boosts the accuracy of Llama 3 8B to 90.7\% on GSM8k and 63.7\% on MATH. This performance is achieved by efficiently selecting the optimal reasoning path from a pool of candidates, allowing it to match or exceed the accuracy of far more resource-intensive Best-of-N sampling techniques. Crucially, our experiments show that EORM generalizes effectively to out-of-distribution problems and unseen models, indicating it learns fundamental principles of valid reasoning. This robustness, combined with its efficiency, establishes EORM as a practical tool for deploying more dependable LLMs in complex, real-world applications.

Related papers

• AutoBool: An Reinforcement-Learning trained LLM for Effective Automated Boolean Query Generation for Systematic Reviews [42.03242247233896]
  AutoBool is a framework that trains large language models (LLMs) to generate effective Boolean queries for medical systematic reviews.<n>We release the largest dataset of its kind: 65588 topics in total for training.<n> Experiments show that AutoBool significantly outperforms zero shot/few shot prompting and matches or exceeds the effectiveness of much larger GPT-based models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-21T04:29:47Z)
• Verifying Large Language Models' Reasoning Paths via Correlation Matrix Rank [71.09032766271493]
  Large language models (LLMs) are prone to errors and hallucinations.<n>How to check their outputs effectively and efficiently has become a critical problem in their applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-28T11:01:10Z)
• MM-HELIX: Boosting Multimodal Long-Chain Reflective Reasoning with Holistic Platform and Adaptive Hybrid Policy Optimization [103.74675519953898]
  Long-chain reflective reasoning is a prerequisite for solving complex real-world problems.<n>We build a benchmark consisting 1,260 samples of 42 challenging synthetic tasks.<n>We generate post-training data and explore learning paradigms for exploiting such data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-09T17:53:58Z)
• SPaRFT: Self-Paced Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models [51.74498855100541]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong reasoning capabilities when fine-tuned with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We propose textbfSPaRFT, a self-paced learning framework that enables efficient learning based on the capability of the model being trained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T03:50:48Z)
• Teaching LLM to Reason: Reinforcement Learning from Algorithmic Problems without Code [76.80306464249217]
  We propose TeaR, which aims at teaching LLMs to reason better.<n>TeaR leverages careful data curation and reinforcement learning to guide models in discovering optimal reasoning paths through code-related tasks.<n>We conduct extensive experiments using two base models and three long-CoT distillation models, with model sizes ranging from 1.5 billion to 32 billion parameters, and across 17 benchmarks spanning Math, Knowledge, Code, and Logical Reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T07:34:05Z)
• Surrogate Signals from Format and Length: Reinforcement Learning for Solving Mathematical Problems without Ground Truth Answers [24.934432751910443]
  This research delves into the utilization of format and length as surrogate signals to train LLMs for mathematical problem-solving.<n>Our study shows that a reward function centered on format correctness alone can yield performance improvements comparable to the standard GRPO algorithm in early phases.<n>The resulting GRPO approach, leveraging format-length surrogate signals, not only matches but surpasses the performance of the standard GRPO algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T02:56:22Z)
• Think or Not? Exploring Thinking Efficiency in Large Reasoning Models via an Information-Theoretic Lens [51.90059610606049]
  This paper revisits the efficiency of such reasoning processes through an information-theoretic lens.<n>We propose two metrics, InfoBias and InfoGain, to quantify divergence from ideal reasoning paths and stepwise information contribution.<n>Motivated by these findings, we introduce an entropy-based Adaptive Think strategy that dynamically halts reasoning once confidence is sufficiently high.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T13:38:56Z)
• The First Few Tokens Are All You Need: An Efficient and Effective Unsupervised Prefix Fine-Tuning Method for Reasoning Models [69.798277882245]
  We introduce Unsupervised Prefix Fine-Tuning (UPFT) to enhance large language models' reasoning efficiency.<n>UPFT removes the need for labeled data or exhaustive sampling.<n> Experiments show that UPFT matches the performance of supervised methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T18:56:03Z)
• Self-Training Elicits Concise Reasoning in Large Language Models [23.475414693530965]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning has enabled large language models (LLMs) to utilize additional computation through intermediate tokens.<n>We propose simple fine-tuning methods which leverage self-generated concise reasoning paths.<n>Our method achieves a 30% reduction in output tokens, across five model families on GSM8K and MATH, while maintaining average accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-27T14:14:50Z)
• Inference Scaling vs Reasoning: An Empirical Analysis of Compute-Optimal LLM Problem-Solving [0.0]
  Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have predominantly focused on maximizing accuracy and reasoning capabilities.<n>This paper investigates the potential synergy between reasoning enhancement and computational efficiency by analyzing the integration of two contrasting approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T08:42:45Z)
• Improving LLM Reasoning through Scaling Inference Computation with Collaborative Verification [52.095460362197336]
  Large language models (LLMs) struggle with consistent and accurate reasoning. LLMs are trained primarily on correct solutions, reducing their ability to detect and learn from errors. We propose a novel collaborative method integrating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and Program-of-Thought (PoT) solutions for verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T05:21:48Z)
• LLaMA-Berry: Pairwise Optimization for O1-like Olympiad-Level Mathematical Reasoning [56.273799410256075]
  The framework combines Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) with iterative Self-Refine to optimize the reasoning path. The framework has been tested on general and advanced benchmarks, showing superior performance in terms of search efficiency and problem-solving capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T18:12:29Z)
• MindStar: Enhancing Math Reasoning in Pre-trained LLMs at Inference Time [51.5039731721706]
  MindStar is a purely inference-based searching method for large language models. It formulates reasoning tasks as searching problems and proposes two search ideas to identify the optimal reasoning paths. It significantly enhances the reasoning abilities of open-source models, such as Llama-2-13B and Mistral-7B, and achieves comparable performance to GPT-3.5 and Grok-1.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-25T15:07:33Z)
• FineQuant: Unlocking Efficiency with Fine-Grained Weight-Only Quantization for LLMs [9.072821427818557]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance across various language tasks but pose challenges for practical deployment. We propose an efficient weight-only quantization method that reduces memory consumption and accelerates inference for LLMs. We evaluate our approach on large-scale open source models such as OPT-175B and internal MoE models, showcasing minimal accuracy loss while achieving up to 3.65 times higher throughput.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-16T23:57:41Z)
• MC-BERT: Efficient Language Pre-Training via a Meta Controller [96.68140474547602]
  Large-scale pre-training is computationally expensive. ELECTRA, an early attempt to accelerate pre-training, trains a discriminative model that predicts whether each input token was replaced by a generator. We propose a novel meta-learning framework, MC-BERT, to achieve better efficiency and effectiveness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-10T09:22:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.