Trends and Challenges in Authorship Analysis: A Review of ML, DL, and LLM Approaches

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15422v1
• Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 12:06:08 GMT
• Title: Trends and Challenges in Authorship Analysis: A Review of ML, DL, and LLM Approaches
• Authors: Nudrat Habib, Tosin Adewumi, Marcus Liwicki, Elisa Barney,
• Abstract summary: Authorship analysis plays an important role in diverse domains, including forensic linguistics, academia, cybersecurity, and digital content authentication.<n>This paper presents a systematic literature review on two key sub-tasks of authorship analysis; Author Attribution and Author Verification.
• Score: 1.8686807993563161
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Authorship analysis plays an important role in diverse domains, including forensic linguistics, academia, cybersecurity, and digital content authentication. This paper presents a systematic literature review on two key sub-tasks of authorship analysis; Author Attribution and Author Verification. The review explores SOTA methodologies, ranging from traditional ML approaches to DL models and LLMs, highlighting their evolution, strengths, and limitations, based on studies conducted from 2015 to 2024. Key contributions include a comprehensive analysis of methods, techniques, their corresponding feature extraction techniques, datasets used, and emerging challenges in authorship analysis. The study highlights critical research gaps, particularly in low-resource language processing, multilingual adaptation, cross-domain generalization, and AI-generated text detection. This review aims to help researchers by giving an overview of the latest trends and challenges in authorship analysis. It also points out possible areas for future study. The goal is to support the development of better, more reliable, and accurate authorship analysis system in diverse textual domain.

Related papers

• Survey on AI-Generated Media Detection: From Non-MLLM to MLLM [51.91311158085973]
  Methods for detecting AI-generated media have evolved rapidly.<n>General-purpose detectors based on MLLMs integrate authenticity verification, explainability, and localization capabilities.<n>Ethical and security considerations have emerged as critical global concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T12:18:20Z)
• Large Language Model for Qualitative Research -- A Systematic Mapping Study [3.302912592091359]
  Large Language Models (LLMs), powered by advanced generative AI, have emerged as transformative tools.<n>This study systematically maps the literature on the use of LLMs for qualitative research.<n>Findings reveal that LLMs are utilized across diverse fields, demonstrating the potential to automate processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-18T21:28:00Z)
• Machine Learning for Missing Value Imputation [0.0]
  The main objective of this article is to conduct a comprehensive and rigorous review, as well as analysis, of the state-of-the-art machine learning applications in Missing Value Imputation. More than 100 articles published between 2014 and 2023 are critically reviewed, considering the methods and findings. The latest literature is examined to scrutinize the trends in MVI methods and their evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T18:56:49Z)
• Surveying the MLLM Landscape: A Meta-Review of Current Surveys [17.372501468675303]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have become a transformative force in the field of artificial intelligence. This survey aims to provide a systematic review of benchmark tests and evaluation methods for MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T14:35:38Z)
• Comprehensive Study on Sentiment Analysis: From Rule-based to modern LLM based system [0.0]
  This study examines the historical development of sentiment analysis, highlighting the transition from lexicon-based and pattern-based approaches to more sophisticated machine learning and deep learning models. The paper reviews state-of-the-art approaches, identifies emerging trends, and outlines future research directions to advance the field.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T04:44:52Z)
• Ontology Embedding: A Survey of Methods, Applications and Resources [54.3453925775069]
  Onologies are widely used for representing domain knowledge and meta data.<n> logical reasoning that can directly support are quite limited in learning, approximation and prediction.<n>One straightforward solution is to integrate statistical analysis and machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T14:49:19Z)
• Large Language Models Meet Text-Centric Multimodal Sentiment Analysis: A Survey [66.166184609616]
  ChatGPT has opened up immense potential for applying large language models (LLMs) to text-centric multimodal tasks. It is still unclear how existing LLMs can adapt better to text-centric multimodal sentiment analysis tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T10:36:27Z)
• QuaLLM: An LLM-based Framework to Extract Quantitative Insights from Online Forums [10.684484559041284]
  This study introduces QuaLLM, a novel framework to analyze and extract quantitative insights from text data on online forums.<n>We applied this framework to analyze over one million comments from two of Reddit's rideshare worker communities.<n>We uncover significant worker concerns regarding AI and algorithmic platform decisions, responding to regulatory calls about worker insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-08T18:20:03Z)
• A Literature Review of Literature Reviews in Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence [55.33653554387953]
  Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (PAMI) has led to numerous literature reviews aimed at collecting and fragmented information.<n>This paper presents a thorough analysis of these literature reviews within the PAMI field.<n>We try to address three core research questions: (1) What are the prevalent structural and statistical characteristics of PAMI literature reviews; (2) What strategies can researchers employ to efficiently navigate the growing corpus of reviews; and (3) What are the advantages and limitations of AI-generated reviews compared to human-authored ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T11:28:50Z)
• Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Check [69.97942065617664]
  This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in performing various sentiment analysis tasks. We evaluate performance across 13 tasks on 26 datasets and compare the results against small language models (SLMs) trained on domain-specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:45:25Z)
• Investigating Fairness Disparities in Peer Review: A Language Model Enhanced Approach [77.61131357420201]
  We conduct a thorough and rigorous study on fairness disparities in peer review with the help of large language models (LMs) We collect, assemble, and maintain a comprehensive relational database for the International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) conference from 2017 to date. We postulate and study fairness disparities on multiple protective attributes of interest, including author gender, geography, author, and institutional prestige.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T16:19:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.