The Devil is in Fine-tuning and Long-tailed Problems:A New Benchmark for Scene Text Detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.15649v1
• Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 15:26:46 GMT
• Title: The Devil is in Fine-tuning and Long-tailed Problems:A New Benchmark for Scene Text Detection
• Authors: Tianjiao Cao, Jiahao Lyu, Weichao Zeng, Weimin Mu, Yu Zhou,
• Abstract summary: Scene text detection methods often fail to replicate such success in real-world scenarios.<n>We uncover two key factors contributing to this discrepancy through extensive experiments.<n>We propose a Long-Tailed Benchmark (LTB) to evaluate ability to handle a diverse range of long-tailed challenges.
• Score: 2.4829769683482437
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Scene text detection has seen the emergence of high-performing methods that excel on academic benchmarks. However, these detectors often fail to replicate such success in real-world scenarios. We uncover two key factors contributing to this discrepancy through extensive experiments. First, a \textit{Fine-tuning Gap}, where models leverage \textit{Dataset-Specific Optimization} (DSO) paradigm for one domain at the cost of reduced effectiveness in others, leads to inflated performances on academic benchmarks. Second, the suboptimal performance in practical settings is primarily attributed to the long-tailed distribution of texts, where detectors struggle with rare and complex categories as artistic or overlapped text. Given that the DSO paradigm might undermine the generalization ability of models, we advocate for a \textit{Joint-Dataset Learning} (JDL) protocol to alleviate the Fine-tuning Gap. Additionally, an error analysis is conducted to identify three major categories and 13 subcategories of challenges in long-tailed scene text, upon which we propose a Long-Tailed Benchmark (LTB). LTB facilitates a comprehensive evaluation of ability to handle a diverse range of long-tailed challenges. We further introduce MAEDet, a self-supervised learning-based method, as a strong baseline for LTB. The code is available at https://github.com/pd162/LTB.

Related papers

• Generalized Semantic Contrastive Learning via Embedding Side Information for Few-Shot Object Detection [52.490375806093745]
  The objective of few-shot object detection (FSOD) is to detect novel objects with few training samples.<n>We introduce the side information to alleviate the negative influences derived from the feature space and sample viewpoints.<n>Our model outperforms the previous state-of-the-art methods, significantly improving the ability of FSOD in most shots/splits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-09T17:24:05Z)
• TS-HTFA: Advancing Time Series Forecasting via Hierarchical Text-Free Alignment with Large Language Models [14.411646409316624]
  We introduce textbfHierarchical textbfText-textbfFree textbfAlignment (textbfTS-HTFA), a novel method for time-series forecasting.<n>We replace paired text data with adaptive virtual text based on QR decomposition word embeddings and learnable prompt.<n>Experiments on multiple time-series benchmarks demonstrate that HTFA achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T12:57:24Z)
• Mitigating Boundary Ambiguity and Inherent Bias for Text Classification in the Era of Large Language Models [24.085614720512744]
  This study shows that large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to changes in the number and arrangement of options in text classification. Key bottleneck arises from ambiguous decision boundaries and inherent biases towards specific tokens and positions. Our approach is grounded in the empirical observation that pairwise comparisons can effectively alleviate boundary ambiguity and inherent bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T06:53:19Z)
• Frequency-based Matcher for Long-tailed Semantic Segmentation [22.199174076366003]
  We focus on a relatively under-explored task setting, long-tailed semantic segmentation (LTSS) We propose a dual-metric evaluation system and construct the LTSS benchmark to demonstrate the performance of semantic segmentation methods and long-tailed solutions. We also propose a transformer-based algorithm to improve LTSS, frequency-based matcher, which solves the oversuppression problem by one-to-many matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T09:57:56Z)
• Sequential Visual and Semantic Consistency for Semi-supervised Text Recognition [56.968108142307976]
  Scene text recognition (STR) is a challenging task that requires large-scale annotated data for training. Most existing STR methods resort to synthetic data, which may introduce domain discrepancy and degrade the performance of STR models. This paper proposes a novel semi-supervised learning method for STR that incorporates word-level consistency regularization from both visual and semantic aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-24T13:00:54Z)
• Fast and Accurate Factual Inconsistency Detection Over Long Documents [19.86348214462828]
  We introduce SCALE, a task-agnostic model for detecting factual inconsistencies using a novel chunking strategy. This approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in factual inconsistency detection for diverse tasks and long inputs. We have released our code and data publicly to GitHub.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T22:55:39Z)
• On Pitfalls of Test-Time Adaptation [82.8392232222119]
  Test-Time Adaptation (TTA) has emerged as a promising approach for tackling the robustness challenge under distribution shifts. We present TTAB, a test-time adaptation benchmark that encompasses ten state-of-the-art algorithms, a diverse array of distribution shifts, and two evaluation protocols.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T09:35:29Z)
• Topic-driven Distant Supervision Framework for Macro-level Discourse Parsing [72.14449502499535]
  The task of analyzing the internal rhetorical structure of texts is a challenging problem in natural language processing. Despite the recent advances in neural models, the lack of large-scale, high-quality corpora for training remains a major obstacle. Recent studies have attempted to overcome this limitation by using distant supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T07:13:51Z)
• Pre-trained Embeddings for Entity Resolution: An Experimental Analysis [Experiment, Analysis & Benchmark] [65.11858854040544]
  We perform a thorough experimental analysis of 12 popular language models over 17 established benchmark datasets. First, we assess their vectorization overhead for converting all input entities into dense embeddings vectors. Second, we investigate their blocking performance, performing a detailed scalability analysis, and comparing them with the state-of-the-art deep learning-based blocking method. Third, we conclude with their relative performance for both supervised and unsupervised matching.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-24T08:53:54Z)
• CoCo: Coherence-Enhanced Machine-Generated Text Detection Under Data Limitation With Contrastive Learning [14.637303913878435]
  We present a coherence-based contrastive learning model named CoCo to detect the possible MGT under low-resource scenario. To exploit the linguistic feature, we encode coherence information in form of graph into text representation. Experiment results on two public datasets and two self-constructed datasets prove our approach outperforms the state-of-art methods significantly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T15:26:19Z)
• Tackling Long-Tailed Category Distribution Under Domain Shifts [50.21255304847395]
  Existing approaches cannot handle the scenario where both issues exist. We designed three novel core functional blocks including Distribution Calibrated Classification Loss, Visual-Semantic Mapping and Semantic-Similarity Guided Augmentation. Two new datasets were proposed for this problem, named AWA2-LTS and ImageNet-LTS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-20T19:07:46Z)
• Toward the Understanding of Deep Text Matching Models for Information Retrieval [72.72380690535766]
  This paper aims at testing whether existing deep text matching methods satisfy some fundamental gradients in information retrieval. Specifically, four attributions are used in our study, i.e., term frequency constraint, term discrimination constraint, length normalization constraints, and TF-length constraint. Experimental results on LETOR 4.0 and MS Marco show that all the investigated deep text matching methods satisfy the above constraints with high probabilities in statistics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-16T13:33:15Z)
• Adaptive Affinity Loss and Erroneous Pseudo-Label Refinement for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentation [48.294903659573585]
  In this paper, we propose to embed affinity learning of multi-stage approaches in a single-stage model. A deep neural network is used to deliver comprehensive semantic information in the training phase. Experiments are conducted on the PASCAL VOC 2012 dataset to evaluate the effectiveness of our proposed approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-03T07:48:33Z)
• The Devil is in Classification: A Simple Framework for Long-tail Object Detection and Instance Segmentation [93.17367076148348]
  We investigate performance drop of the state-of-the-art two-stage instance segmentation model Mask R-CNN on the recent long-tail LVIS dataset. We unveil that a major cause is the inaccurate classification of object proposals. We propose a simple calibration framework to more effectively alleviate classification head bias with a bi-level class balanced sampling approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-23T12:49:07Z)
• Text Recognition in Real Scenarios with a Few Labeled Samples [55.07859517380136]
  Scene text recognition (STR) is still a hot research topic in computer vision field. This paper proposes a few-shot adversarial sequence domain adaptation (FASDA) approach to build sequence adaptation. Our approach can maximize the character-level confusion between the source domain and the target domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-22T13:03:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.