Multivariate Latent Recalibration for Conditional Normalizing Flows

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16636v1
• Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 13:08:20 GMT
• Title: Multivariate Latent Recalibration for Conditional Normalizing Flows
• Authors: Victor Dheur, Souhaib Ben Taieb,
• Abstract summary: latent recalibration learns a transformation of the latent space with finite-sample bounds on latent calibration.<n>LR consistently improves latent calibration error and the negative log-likelihood of the recalibrated models.
• Score: 2.3020018305241337
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Reliably characterizing the full conditional distribution of a multivariate response variable given a set of covariates is crucial for trustworthy decision-making. However, misspecified or miscalibrated multivariate models may yield a poor approximation of the joint distribution of the response variables, leading to unreliable predictions and suboptimal decisions. Furthermore, standard recalibration methods are primarily limited to univariate settings, while conformal prediction techniques, despite generating multivariate prediction regions with coverage guarantees, do not provide a full probability density function. We address this gap by first introducing a novel notion of latent calibration, which assesses probabilistic calibration in the latent space of a conditional normalizing flow. Second, we propose latent recalibration (LR), a novel post-hoc model recalibration method that learns a transformation of the latent space with finite-sample bounds on latent calibration. Unlike existing methods, LR produces a recalibrated distribution with an explicit multivariate density function while remaining computationally efficient. Extensive experiments on both tabular and image datasets show that LR consistently improves latent calibration error and the negative log-likelihood of the recalibrated models.

Related papers

• Discretization-free Multicalibration through Loss Minimization over Tree Ensembles [22.276913140687725]
  We propose a discretization-free multicalibration method over an ensemble of depth-two decision trees.<n>Our algorithm provably achieves multicalibration, provided that the data distribution satisfies a technical condition we term as loss saturation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T03:29:58Z)
• Calibrated Multivariate Regression with Localized PIT Mappings [4.277516034244117]
  This paper introduces a novel post-hoc recalibration approach that addresses multivariate calibration for potentially misspecified models. We present two versions of our approach: one uses K-nearest neighbors, and the other uses normalizing flows. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on two real data applications: recalibrating a deep neural network's currency exchange rate forecast and improving a regression model for childhood malnutrition in India.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-17T02:41:03Z)
• Multivariate root-n-consistent smoothing parameter free matching estimators and estimators of inverse density weighted expectations [51.000851088730684]
  We develop novel modifications of nearest-neighbor and matching estimators which converge at the parametric $sqrt n $-rate.<n>We stress that our estimators do not involve nonparametric function estimators and in particular do not rely on sample-size dependent parameters smoothing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T13:28:34Z)
• Marginalization Consistent Probabilistic Forecasting of Irregular Time Series via Mixture of Separable flows [4.489135297410294]
  Probabilistic forecasting models for joint distributions of targets in irregular time series with missing values are a heavily under-researched area in machine learning.<n>We propose MOSES (Marginalization Consistent Mixture of Separable Flows), a model that parametrizes a mixture of several latent Gaussian processes combined with separable uni- normality flows.<n>Experiments on four datasets show that MOSES achieves both accurate joint and marginal predictions, surpassing all other marginalization consistent baselines, while only trailing slightly behind ProFITi in joint prediction, but vastly superior when predicting marginal distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T13:28:43Z)
• Robust scalable initialization for Bayesian variational inference with multi-modal Laplace approximations [0.0]
  Variational mixtures with full-covariance structures suffer from a quadratic growth due to variational parameters with the number of parameters. We propose a method for constructing an initial Gaussian model approximation that can be used to warm-start variational inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T19:30:04Z)
• Sharp Calibrated Gaussian Processes [58.94710279601622]
  State-of-the-art approaches for designing calibrated models rely on inflating the Gaussian process posterior variance. We present a calibration approach that generates predictive quantiles using a computation inspired by the vanilla Gaussian process posterior variance. Our approach is shown to yield a calibrated model under reasonable assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T12:17:36Z)
• Parametric and Multivariate Uncertainty Calibration for Regression and Object Detection [4.630093015127541]
  We show that common detection models overestimate the spatial uncertainty in comparison to the observed error. Our experiments show that the simple Isotonic Regression recalibration method is sufficient to achieve a good calibrated uncertainty. In contrast, if normal distributions are required for subsequent processes, our GP-Normal recalibration method yields the best results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T08:00:20Z)
• Robust Calibration with Multi-domain Temperature Scaling [86.07299013396059]
  We develop a systematic calibration model to handle distribution shifts by leveraging data from multiple domains. Our proposed method -- multi-domain temperature scaling -- uses the robustness in the domains to improve calibration under distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-06T17:32:12Z)
• Amortized Conditional Normalized Maximum Likelihood: Reliable Out of Distribution Uncertainty Estimation [99.92568326314667]
  We propose the amortized conditional normalized maximum likelihood (ACNML) method as a scalable general-purpose approach for uncertainty estimation. Our algorithm builds on the conditional normalized maximum likelihood (CNML) coding scheme, which has minimax optimal properties according to the minimum description length principle. We demonstrate that ACNML compares favorably to a number of prior techniques for uncertainty estimation in terms of calibration on out-of-distribution inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-05T08:04:34Z)
• Reliable Categorical Variational Inference with Mixture of Discrete Normalizing Flows [10.406659081400354]
  Variational approximations are increasingly based on gradient-based optimization of expectations estimated by sampling. Continuous relaxations, such as the Gumbel-Softmax for categorical distribution, enable gradient-based optimization, but do not define a valid probability mass for discrete observations. In practice, selecting the amount of relaxation is difficult and one needs to optimize an objective that does not align with the desired one.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-28T10:39:39Z)
• Calibration of Neural Networks using Splines [51.42640515410253]
  Measuring calibration error amounts to comparing two empirical distributions. We introduce a binning-free calibration measure inspired by the classical Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) statistical test. Our method consistently outperforms existing methods on KS error as well as other commonly used calibration measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-23T07:18:05Z)
• SUMO: Unbiased Estimation of Log Marginal Probability for Latent Variable Models [80.22609163316459]
  We introduce an unbiased estimator of the log marginal likelihood and its gradients for latent variable models based on randomized truncation of infinite series. We show that models trained using our estimator give better test-set likelihoods than a standard importance-sampling based approach for the same average computational cost.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-01T11:49:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.