AI/ML for 5G and Beyond Cybersecurity

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18402v1
• Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 22:12:50 GMT
• Title: AI/ML for 5G and Beyond Cybersecurity
• Abstract summary: We will review the role of the AI/ML technique for 5G and beyond security.<n>We will provide our perspective for predicting and mitigating 5G and beyond security using AI/ML techniques.
• Score: 3.5231833874037544
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The advancements in communication technology (5G and beyond) and global connectivity Internet of Things (IoT) also come with new security problems that will need to be addressed in the next few years. The threats and vulnerabilities introduced by AI/ML based 5G and beyond IoT systems need to be investigated to avoid the amplification of attack vectors on AI/ML. AI/ML techniques are playing a vital role in numerous applications of cybersecurity. Despite the ongoing success, there are significant challenges in ensuring the trustworthiness of AI/ML systems. However, further research is needed to define what is considered an AI/ML threat and how it differs from threats to traditional systems, as currently there is no common understanding of what constitutes an attack on AI/ML based systems, nor how it might be created, hosted and propagated [ETSI, 2020]. Therefore, there is a need for studying the AI/ML approach to ensure safe and secure development, deployment, and operation of AI/ML based 5G and beyond IoT systems. For 5G and beyond, it is essential to continuously monitor and analyze any changing environment in real-time to identify and reduce intentional and unintentional risks. In this study, we will review the role of the AI/ML technique for 5G and beyond security. Furthermore, we will provide our perspective for predicting and mitigating 5G and beyond security using AI/ML techniques.

Related papers

• Large Language Models (LLMs) and Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy: A Survey of Dual-Use Risks, AI-Generated Malware, Explainability, and Defensive Strategies [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) and generative AI (GenAI) systems are revolutionizing cybersecurity.<n>These technologies power real-time threat detection, phishing defense, secure code generation, and vulnerability exploitation at unprecedented scales.<n>This paper presents a comprehensive survey of the beneficial and malicious applications of LLMs in cybersecurity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-08T03:40:26Z)
• Cyber Threat Intelligence for Artificial Intelligence Systems [0.0]
  We investigate how cyber threat intelligence may evolve to address attacks that target AI systems.<n>We outline what an AI-oriented threat intelligence knowledge base should contain.<n>We discuss techniques for measuring similarity between collected indicators and newly observed AI artifacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-05T11:37:47Z)
• Frontier AI Risk Management Framework in Practice: A Risk Analysis Technical Report v1.5 [61.787178868669265]
  This technical report presents an updated and granular assessment of five critical dimensions: cyber offense, persuasion and manipulation, strategic deception, uncontrolled AI R&D, and self-replication.<n>This work reflects our current understanding of AI frontier risks and urges collective action to mitigate these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-16T04:30:06Z)
• ANNIE: Be Careful of Your Robots [48.89876809734855]
  We present the first systematic study of adversarial safety attacks on embodied AI systems.<n>We show attack success rates exceeding 50% across all safety categories.<n>Results expose a previously underexplored but highly consequential attack surface in embodied AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-03T15:00:28Z)
• AI threats to national security can be countered through an incident regime [55.2480439325792]
  We propose a legally mandated post-deployment AI incident regime that aims to counter potential national security threats from AI systems.<n>Our proposed AI incident regime is split into three phases. The first phase revolves around a novel operationalization of what counts as an 'AI incident'<n>The second and third phases spell out that AI providers should notify a government agency about incidents, and that the government agency should be involved in amending AI providers' security and safety procedures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-25T17:51:50Z)
• Enabling AutoML for Zero-Touch Network Security: Use-Case Driven Analysis [20.030842817472347]
  Zero-Touch Networks (ZTNs) represent a state-of-the-art paradigm shift towards fully automated and intelligent network management.<n>ZTNs leverage Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) to enhance operational efficiency, support intelligent decision-making, and ensure effective resource allocation.<n>The implementation of ZTNs is subject to security challenges that need to be resolved to achieve their full potential.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-28T18:06:03Z)
• Position: Mind the Gap-the Growing Disconnect Between Established Vulnerability Disclosure and AI Security [56.219994752894294]
  We argue that adapting existing processes for AI security reporting is doomed to fail due to fundamental shortcomings for the distinctive characteristics of AI systems.<n>Based on our proposal to address these shortcomings, we discuss an approach to AI security reporting and how the new AI paradigm, AI agents, will further reinforce the need for specialized AI security incident reporting advancements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T13:50:26Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• Managing extreme AI risks amid rapid progress [171.05448842016125]
  We describe risks that include large-scale social harms, malicious uses, and irreversible loss of human control over autonomous AI systems. There is a lack of consensus about how exactly such risks arise, and how to manage them. Present governance initiatives lack the mechanisms and institutions to prevent misuse and recklessness, and barely address autonomous systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T17:59:06Z)
• AI Maintenance: A Robustness Perspective [91.28724422822003]
  We introduce highlighted robustness challenges in the AI lifecycle and motivate AI maintenance by making analogies to car maintenance. We propose an AI model inspection framework to detect and mitigate robustness risks. Our proposal for AI maintenance facilitates robustness assessment, status tracking, risk scanning, model hardening, and regulation throughout the AI lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-08T15:02:38Z)
• CTI4AI: Threat Intelligence Generation and Sharing after Red Teaming AI Models [0.0]
  A need to identify system vulnerabilities, potential threats, characterize properties that will enhance system robustness. A secondary need is to share this AI security threat intelligence between different stakeholders like, model developers, users, and AI/ML security professionals. In this paper, we create and describe a prototype system CTI4AI, to overcome the need to methodically identify and share AI/ML specific vulnerabilities and threat intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-16T00:16:58Z)
• A Survey on XAI for 5G and Beyond Security: Technical Aspects, Challenges and Research Directions [5.955491600905514]
  This paper explores the potential of Explainable AI (XAI) methods, which would allow stakeholders in 5G and beyond to inspect intelligent black-box systems used to secure next-generation networks. The goal of using XAI in the security domain of 5G and beyond is to allow the decision-making processes of ML-based security systems to be transparent and comprehensible to 5G and beyond stakeholders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-27T10:26:24Z)
• Proceedings of the Artificial Intelligence for Cyber Security (AICS) Workshop at AAAI 2022 [55.573187938617636]
  The workshop will focus on the application of AI to problems in cyber security. Cyber systems generate large volumes of data, utilizing this effectively is beyond human capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-28T18:27:41Z)
• Advancing the Research and Development of Assured Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Capabilities [2.688723831634804]
  An adversarial AI (A2I) and adversarial ML (AML) attack seeks to deceive and manipulate AI/ML models. It is imperative that AI/ML models can defend against these attacks. The A2I Working Group (A2IWG) seeks to advance the research and development of assured AI/ML capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-24T20:12:14Z)
• Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in 5G Network Security: Opportunities, advantages, and future research trends [5.431496585727341]
  5G networks' primary selling point has been higher data rates and speed. As 5G networks' primary selling point has been higher data rates and speed, it will be difficult to tackle wide range of threats. This article presents AI and ML driven applications for 5G network security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-09T01:02:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.