Invisible Tokens, Visible Bills: The Urgent Need to Audit Hidden Operations in Opaque LLM Services

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18471v1
• Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 02:26:49 GMT
• Title: Invisible Tokens, Visible Bills: The Urgent Need to Audit Hidden Operations in Opaque LLM Services
• Authors: Guoheng Sun, Ziyao Wang, Xuandong Zhao, Bowei Tian, Zheyu Shen, Yexiao He, Jinming Xing, Ang Li,
• Abstract summary: This position paper highlights emerging accountability challenges in commercial Opaque LLM Services (COLS)<n>We formalize two key risks: textitquantity inflation, where token and call counts may be artificially inflated, and textitquality downgrade, where providers might quietly substitute lower-cost models or tools.<n>We propose a modular three-layer auditing framework for COLS and users that enables trustworthy verification across execution, secure logging, and user-facing auditability without exposing proprietary internals.
• Score: 22.700907666937177
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Modern large language model (LLM) services increasingly rely on complex, often abstract operations, such as multi-step reasoning and multi-agent collaboration, to generate high-quality outputs. While users are billed based on token consumption and API usage, these internal steps are typically not visible. We refer to such systems as Commercial Opaque LLM Services (COLS). This position paper highlights emerging accountability challenges in COLS: users are billed for operations they cannot observe, verify, or contest. We formalize two key risks: \textit{quantity inflation}, where token and call counts may be artificially inflated, and \textit{quality downgrade}, where providers might quietly substitute lower-cost models or tools. Addressing these risks requires a diverse set of auditing strategies, including commitment-based, predictive, behavioral, and signature-based methods. We further explore the potential of complementary mechanisms such as watermarking and trusted execution environments to enhance verifiability without compromising provider confidentiality. We also propose a modular three-layer auditing framework for COLS and users that enables trustworthy verification across execution, secure logging, and user-facing auditability without exposing proprietary internals. Our aim is to encourage further research and policy development toward transparency, auditability, and accountability in commercial LLM services.

Related papers

• Disclosure Audits for LLM Agents [44.27620230177312]
  Large Language Model agents have begun to appear as personal assistants, customer service bots, and clinical aides.<n>This study proposes an auditing framework for conversational privacy that quantifies and audits these risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T20:47:37Z)
• CoTGuard: Using Chain-of-Thought Triggering for Copyright Protection in Multi-Agent LLM Systems [55.57181090183713]
  We introduce CoTGuard, a novel framework for copyright protection that leverages trigger-based detection within Chain-of-Thought reasoning.<n>Specifically, we can activate specific CoT segments and monitor intermediate reasoning steps for unauthorized content reproduction by embedding specific trigger queries into agent prompts.<n>This approach enables fine-grained, interpretable detection of copyright violations in collaborative agent scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T01:42:37Z)
• CoIn: Counting the Invisible Reasoning Tokens in Commercial Opaque LLM APIs [13.31195673556853]
  We propose CoIn, a verification framework that audits both the quantity and semantic validity of hidden tokens.<n>Experiments demonstrate that CoIn, when deployed as a trusted third-party auditor, can effectively detect token count inflation with a success rate reaching up to 94.7%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T23:39:23Z)
• Are You Getting What You Pay For? Auditing Model Substitution in LLM APIs [60.881609323604685]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) accessed via black-box APIs introduce a trust challenge.<n>Users pay for services based on advertised model capabilities.<n> providers may covertly substitute the specified model with a cheaper, lower-quality alternative to reduce operational costs.<n>This lack of transparency undermines fairness, erodes trust, and complicates reliable benchmarking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T03:57:41Z)
• Policy Frameworks for Transparent Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Large Language Models [1.0088912103548195]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning enhances large language models (LLMs) by decomposing complex problems into step-by-step solutions.<n>Current CoT disclosure policies vary widely across different models in visibility, API access, and pricing strategies, lacking a unified policy framework.<n>We propose a tiered-access policy framework that balances transparency, accountability, and security by tailoring CoT availability to academic, business, and general users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T19:54:18Z)
• Balancing Confidentiality and Transparency for Blockchain-based Process-Aware Information Systems [46.404531555921906]
  We propose an architecture for blockchain-based PAISs aimed at preserving both confidentiality and transparency.<n>Smart contracts enact, enforce and store public interactions, while attribute-based encryption techniques are adopted to specify access grants to confidential information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-07T20:18:36Z)
• Transforming Triple-Entry Accounting with Machine Learning: A Path to Enhanced Transparency Through Analytics [0.0]
  Triple Entry (TE) accounting could help improve transparency in complex financial and supply chain transactions such as blockchain. Machine learning (ML) presents a promising avenue to augment the transparency advantages of TE accounting. By automating some of the data collection and analysis needed for TE bookkeeping, ML techniques have the potential to make this more transparent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-19T08:58:44Z)
• A Practical and Privacy-Preserving Framework for Real-World Large Language Model Services [8.309281698695381]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in text understanding and generation. Individuals often rely on online AI as a Service (AI) provided by LLM companies. This business model poses significant privacy risks, as service providers may exploit users' trace patterns and behavioral data. We propose a practical and privacy-preserving framework that ensures user anonymity by preventing service providers from linking requests to the individuals who submit them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T07:40:28Z)
• CLAMBER: A Benchmark of Identifying and Clarifying Ambiguous Information Needs in Large Language Models [60.59638232596912]
  We introduce CLAMBER, a benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) Building upon the taxonomy, we construct 12K high-quality data to assess the strengths, weaknesses, and potential risks of various off-the-shelf LLMs. Our findings indicate the limited practical utility of current LLMs in identifying and clarifying ambiguous user queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T14:34:01Z)
• Detectors for Safe and Reliable LLMs: Implementations, Uses, and Limitations [76.19419888353586]
  Large language models (LLMs) are susceptible to a variety of risks, from non-faithful output to biased and toxic generations. We present our efforts to create and deploy a library of detectors: compact and easy-to-build classification models that provide labels for various harms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-09T21:07:16Z)
• AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agents [88.45506148281379]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly smart and autonomous, targeting real-world pragmatic missions beyond traditional NLP tasks. We present AgentBench, a benchmark that currently consists of 8 distinct environments to assess LLM-as-Agent's reasoning and decision-making abilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-07T16:08:11Z)
• Creating Training Sets via Weak Indirect Supervision [66.77795318313372]
  Weak Supervision (WS) frameworks synthesize training labels from multiple potentially noisy supervision sources. We formulate Weak Indirect Supervision (WIS), a new research problem for automatically synthesizing training labels. We develop a probabilistic modeling approach, PLRM, which uses user-provided label relations to model and leverage indirect supervision sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-07T14:09:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.