Diversity and Inclusion in AI: Insights from a Survey of AI/ML Practitioners

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18523v1
• Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 05:40:23 GMT
• Title: Diversity and Inclusion in AI: Insights from a Survey of AI/ML Practitioners
• Authors: Sidra Malik, Muneera Bano, Didar Zowghi,
• Abstract summary: Growing awareness of social biases and inequalities embedded in Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems has brought increased attention to the integration of Diversity and Inclusion (D&I) principles throughout the AI lifecycle.<n>Despite the rise of ethical AI guidelines, there is limited empirical evidence on how D&I is applied in real-world settings.<n>This study explores how AI and Machine Learning(ML) practitioners perceive and implement D&I principles and identifies organisational challenges that hinder their effective adoption.
• Score: 4.761639988815896
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Growing awareness of social biases and inequalities embedded in Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems has brought increased attention to the integration of Diversity and Inclusion (D&I) principles throughout the AI lifecycle. Despite the rise of ethical AI guidelines, there is limited empirical evidence on how D&I is applied in real-world settings. This study explores how AI and Machine Learning(ML) practitioners perceive and implement D&I principles and identifies organisational challenges that hinder their effective adoption. Using a mixed-methods approach, we surveyed industry professionals, collecting both quantitative and qualitative data on current practices, perceived impacts, and challenges related to D&I in AI. While most respondents recognise D&I as essential for mitigating bias and enhancing fairness, practical implementation remains inconsistent. Our analysis revealed a disconnect between perceived benefits and current practices, with major barriers including the under-representation of marginalised groups, lack of organisational transparency, and limited awareness among early-career professionals. Despite these barriers, respondents widely agree that diverse teams contribute to ethical, trustworthy, and innovative AI systems. By underpinning the key pain points and areas requiring improvement, this study highlights the need to bridge the gap between D&I principles and real-world AI development practices.

Related papers

• Bridging the Gap: Integrating Ethics and Environmental Sustainability in AI Research and Practice [57.94036023167952]
  We argue that the efforts aiming to study AI's ethical ramifications should be made in tandem with those evaluating its impacts on the environment.<n>We propose best practices to better integrate AI ethics and sustainability in AI research and practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T13:53:11Z)
• What is Ethical: AIHED Driving Humans or Human-Driven AIHED? A Conceptual Framework enabling the Ethos of AI-driven Higher education [0.6216023343793144]
  This study introduces the Human-Driven AI in Higher Education (HD-AIHED) Framework to ensure compliance with UNESCO and OECD ethical standards.<n>The study applies a participatory co-system, Phased Human Intelligence, SWOC analysis, and AI ethical review boards to assess AI readiness and governance strategies for universities and HE institutions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-07T11:13:31Z)
• From Principles to Practice: A Deep Dive into AI Ethics and Regulations [13.753819576072127]
  The article thoroughly analyzes the ground-breaking AI regulatory framework proposed by the European Union.<n>Considering the technical efforts and strategies undertaken by academics and industry to uphold these principles, we explore the synergies and conflicts among the five ethical principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T00:46:20Z)
• Diversity and Inclusion in AI for Recruitment: Lessons from Industry Workshop [44.807030880787345]
  This study investigates the practical application of D&I guidelines in AI-driven online job-seeking systems. We conducted a co-design workshop with a large multinational recruitment company. The results suggest developing tailored D&I guidelines and ongoing support to ensure the effective adoption of inclusive AI practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-09T04:45:47Z)
• AI for All: Identifying AI incidents Related to Diversity and Inclusion [5.364403920214549]
  This study identifies and understanding D&I issues within AI systems through a manual analysis of AI incident databases. Almost half of the analyzed AI incidents are related to D&I, with a notable predominance of racial, gender, and age discrimination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T08:54:56Z)
• Testing autonomous vehicles and AI: perspectives and challenges from cybersecurity, transparency, robustness and fairness [53.91018508439669]
  The study explores the complexities of integrating Artificial Intelligence into Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) It examines the challenges introduced by AI components and the impact on testing procedures. The paper identifies significant challenges and suggests future directions for research and development of AI in AV technology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:29:42Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• Investigating Responsible AI for Scientific Research: An Empirical Study [4.597781832707524]
  The push for Responsible AI (RAI) in such institutions underscores the increasing emphasis on integrating ethical considerations within AI design and development. This paper aims to assess the awareness and preparedness regarding the ethical risks inherent in AI design and development. Our results have revealed certain knowledge gaps concerning ethical, responsible, and inclusive AI, with limitations in awareness of the available AI ethics frameworks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T06:40:27Z)
• Fairness in Agreement With European Values: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on AI Regulation [61.77881142275982]
  This interdisciplinary position paper considers various concerns surrounding fairness and discrimination in AI, and discusses how AI regulations address them. We first look at AI and fairness through the lenses of law, (AI) industry, sociotechnology, and (moral) philosophy, and present various perspectives. We identify and propose the roles AI Regulation should take to make the endeavor of the AI Act a success in terms of AI fairness concerns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-08T12:32:08Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.