Flex-Judge: Text-Only Reasoning Unleashes Zero-Shot Multimodal Evaluators

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.18601v4
• Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 06:19:03 GMT
• Title: Flex-Judge: Text-Only Reasoning Unleashes Zero-Shot Multimodal Evaluators
• Authors: Jongwoo Ko, Sungnyun Kim, Sungwoo Cho, Se-Young Yun,
• Abstract summary: Flex-Judge is a reasoning-guided multimodal judge model that leverages minimal textual reasoning data.<n>Our framework highlights reasoning-based text supervision as a powerful, cost-effective alternative to traditional annotation-intensive approaches.
• Score: 45.00450861498919
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Human-generated reward signals are critical for aligning generative models with human preferences, guiding both training and inference-time evaluations. While large language models (LLMs) employed as proxy evaluators, i.e., LLM-as-a-Judge, significantly reduce the costs associated with manual annotations, they typically require extensive modality-specific training data and fail to generalize well across diverse multimodal tasks. In this paper, we propose Flex-Judge, a reasoning-guided multimodal judge model that leverages minimal textual reasoning data to robustly generalize across multiple modalities and evaluation formats. Our core intuition is that structured textual reasoning explanations inherently encode generalizable decision-making patterns, enabling an effective transfer to multimodal judgments, e.g., with images or videos. Empirical results demonstrate that Flex-Judge, despite being trained on significantly fewer text data, achieves competitive or superior performance compared to state-of-the-art commercial APIs and extensively trained multimodal evaluators. Notably, Flex-Judge presents broad impact in modalities like molecule, where comprehensive evaluation benchmarks are scarce, underscoring its practical value in resource-constrained domains. Our framework highlights reasoning-based text supervision as a powerful, cost-effective alternative to traditional annotation-intensive approaches, substantially advancing scalable multimodal model-as-a-judge.

Related papers

• MERRY: Semantically Decoupled Evaluation of Multimodal Emotional and Role Consistencies of Role-Playing Agents [41.829135334587626]
  MERRY is a semantically decoupled evaluation framework for assessing Multimodal Emotional and Role consistencies of Role-playing agents.<n>We transform the traditional subjective scoring approach into a novel bidirectional-evidence-finding task.<n>We conduct extensive evaluations based on MERRY.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T02:53:58Z)
• Multimodal Fact-Level Attribution for Verifiable Reasoning [80.60864342985748]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are increasingly used for real-world tasks involving multi-step reasoning and long-form generation.<n>Existing multimodal grounding benchmarks and evaluation methods fail to assess attribution in complex multimodal reasoning.<n>We introduce MuRGAt, a benchmark for evaluating fact-level multimodal attribution in settings that require reasoning beyond direct observation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T03:10:02Z)
• From Sparse Decisions to Dense Reasoning: A Multi-attribute Trajectory Paradigm for Multimodal Moderation [59.27094165576015]
  We propose a novel learning paradigm (UniMod) that transitions from sparse decision-making to dense reasoning traces.<n>By constructing structured trajectories encompassing evidence grounding, modality assessment, risk mapping, policy decision, and response generation, we reformulate monolithic decision tasks into a multi-dimensional boundary learning process.<n>We introduce specialized optimization strategies to decouple task-specific parameters and rebalance training dynamics, effectively resolving interference between diverse objectives in multi-task learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T09:29:40Z)
• Boosting Multi-modal Keyphrase Prediction with Dynamic Chain-of-Thought in Vision-Language Models [28.416254061159176]
  Multi-modal keyphrase prediction (MMKP) aims to advance beyond text-only methods.<n>Traditional multi-modal approaches have been proven to have significant limitations in handling the challenging absence and unseen scenarios.<n>We propose leveraging vision-language models (VLMs) for the MMKP task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T13:13:07Z)
• Beyond Spurious Signals: Debiasing Multimodal Large Language Models via Counterfactual Inference and Adaptive Expert Routing [10.66971486730557]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown substantial capabilities in integrating visual and textual information, yet frequently rely on spurious correlations.<n>This paper addresses the critical challenge of superficial correlation bias in MLLMs through a novel causal mediation-based debiasing framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-18T19:01:11Z)
• HumanOmniV2: From Understanding to Omni-Modal Reasoning with Context [26.506057678587176]
  Insufficient context understanding can happen when a model misinterprets multimodal context, resulting in incorrect answers.<n>The shortcut problem occurs when the model overlooks crucial clues in multimodal inputs, directly addressing the query without considering the multimodal information.<n>We introduce a reasoning omni-modal benchmark, IntentBench, aimed at evaluating models in understanding complex human intentions and emotions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-26T14:01:03Z)
• MEXA: Towards General Multimodal Reasoning with Dynamic Multi-Expert Aggregation [64.85885900375483]
  MEXA is a training-free framework that performs modality- and task-aware aggregation of expert models.<n>We evaluate our approach on diverse multimodal benchmarks, including Video Reasoning, Audio Reasoning, 3D Understanding, and Medical QA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T16:14:13Z)
• Truth in the Few: High-Value Data Selection for Efficient Multi-Modal Reasoning [71.3533541927459]
  We propose a novel data selection paradigm termed Activation Reasoning Potential (RAP)<n>RAP identifies cognitive samples by estimating each sample's potential to stimulate genuine multi-modal reasoning.<n>Our RAP method consistently achieves superior performance using only 9.3% of the training data, while reducing computational costs by over 43%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T08:40:24Z)
• PixelThink: Towards Efficient Chain-of-Pixel Reasoning [70.32510083790069]
  PixelThink is a simple yet effective scheme that integrates externally estimated task difficulty and internally measured model uncertainty.<n>It learns to compress reasoning length in accordance with scene complexity and predictive confidence.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach improves both reasoning efficiency and overall segmentation performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T17:55:49Z)
• Model Utility Law: Evaluating LLMs beyond Performance through Mechanism Interpretable Metric [99.56567010306807]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become indispensable across academia, industry, and daily applications.<n>One core challenge of evaluation in the large language model (LLM) era is the generalization issue.<n>We propose Model Utilization Index (MUI), a mechanism interpretability enhanced metric that complements traditional performance scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-10T04:09:47Z)
• The Devil Is in the Details: Tackling Unimodal Spurious Correlations for Generalizable Multimodal Reward Models [31.81567038783558]
  Multimodal Reward Models (MM-RMs) are crucial for aligning Large Language Models (LLMs) with human preferences.<n> MM-RMs often struggle to generalize to out-of-distribution data due to their reliance on unimodal spurious correlations.<n>We introduce a Shortcut-aware MM-RM learning algorithm that mitigates this issue by dynamically reweighting training samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-05T02:37:41Z)
• JudgeBlender: Ensembling Judgments for Automatic Relevance Assessment [28.4353755578306]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in generating relevance labels for search tasks.<n>We introduce JudgeBlender, a framework that employs smaller, open-source models to provide relevance judgments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-17T19:04:15Z)
• MMIE: Massive Multimodal Interleaved Comprehension Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [71.36392373876505]
  We introduce MMIE, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating interleaved multimodal comprehension and generation in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>MMIE comprises 20K meticulously curated multimodal queries, spanning 3 categories, 12 fields, and 102 subfields, including mathematics, coding, physics, literature, health, and arts.<n>It supports both interleaved inputs and outputs, offering a mix of multiple-choice and open-ended question formats to evaluate diverse competencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T04:15:00Z)
• Reference-Guided Verdict: LLMs-as-Judges in Automatic Evaluation of Free-Form Text [12.879551933541345]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of generating human-like conversations. Conventional metrics like BLEU and ROUGE are inadequate for capturing the subtle semantics and contextual richness of such generative outputs. We propose a reference-guided verdict method that automates the evaluation process by leveraging multiple LLMs-as-judges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T16:01:45Z)
• When is an Embedding Model More Promising than Another? [33.540506562970776]
  Embedders play a central role in machine learning, projecting any object into numerical representations that can be leveraged to perform various downstream tasks. The evaluation of embedding models typically depends on domain-specific empirical approaches. We present a unified approach to evaluate embedders, drawing upon the concepts of sufficiency and informativeness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T18:13:46Z)
• Sample Efficient Preference Alignment in LLMs via Active Exploration [63.84454768573154]
  We take advantage of the fact that one can often choose contexts at which to obtain human feedback to most efficiently identify a good policy.<n>We propose an active exploration algorithm to efficiently select the data and provide theoretical proof that it has a worst-case regret bound.<n>Our method outperforms the baselines with limited samples of human preferences on several language models and four real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T00:54:02Z)
• MinT: Boosting Generalization in Mathematical Reasoning via Multi-View Fine-Tuning [53.90744622542961]
  Reasoning in mathematical domains remains a significant challenge for small language models (LMs) We introduce a new method that exploits existing mathematical problem datasets with diverse annotation styles. Experimental results show that our strategy enables a LLaMA-7B model to outperform prior approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-16T05:41:53Z)
• Adaptive Contrastive Learning on Multimodal Transformer for Review Helpfulness Predictions [40.70793282367128]
  We propose Multimodal Contrastive Learning for Multimodal Review Helpfulness Prediction (MRHP) problem. In addition, we introduce Adaptive Weighting scheme for our contrastive learning approach. Finally, we propose Multimodal Interaction module to address the unalignment nature of multimodal data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-07T13:05:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.